1/10. Whatever happened to protecting monuments and federal property, which seemed so important to our government this summer and fall?
2/10. The idea of protecting property was used to beat people protesting for the right of African Americans to stay alive.
3/10. The idea of protecting monuments was used to justify surveilling any American who might be inclined to protest.
4/10. Yet fascists can casually invade our most important federal property, the Capitol.
5/10. Fascists can casually profane our monument to democracy, the Capitol.
6/10. Are the fascists right that the Capitol is "their house"? That depends on us.
7/10. Senators and representatives who call black people voting "fraud" are telling the fascists that the Capitol is their house.
8/10. The eight senators and 139 representatives who voted against democracy were telling a big lie about this election, and about American history.
9/10. The eight senators and 139 representatives who voted against democracy are saying that some Americans have the right to violently overthrow our system, and others don't even have the right to vote.
10/10. The eight senators and 139 representatives who voted to overturn democracy own this attempted coup, forever. Led by Josh Hawley and Ted Cruz, they are the fascist faction of the Republican Party.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/4. Important work here: Trump is violent rather than strong, and using US troops on protesters would break America. nytimes.com/2024/08/17/us/…
2/4. Crucial point in the reporting: the most radical plans, such as the use of US troops against Americans, actually go beyond Project 2025. nytimes.com/2024/08/17/us/…
3/4. A point not raised here is the effect that orders to suppress American protesters would have on the military itself. Either it resists or it becomes a tool of fascist power.
1/7. Right-wing justices postulate Trump's "immunity." The objection is that this makes him a king. Not so. It's much worse.
2/7. A king can be subject to law. Even George III was subject to law. The American Revolution was justified by the notion that he had overstepped the law.
3/7. This discussion of immunity is something else. The justices are not discussing any constitutional system at all, including a constitutional monarchy.