The very idea that we should concern ourselves with establishing rules of conduct that guarantee equal treatment for both ourselves & for the racist, murdering fascists who are aiming to carry out genocide & overthrow democratic governments makes no sense.
I appreciate everyone’s commitment to ideas of liberalism & equality but fascism exists outside of liberalism & there are people trying to kill us whose very ideology is based on the idea of there being no equality. They can only defeat us or be defeated.
There’s a reason we had an entire world war over this issue and it’s not because people at the time couldn’t figure out how to come up with a standard for free speech that applied equally to fascists & all the people they were trying to kill.
Furthermore, the idea we have to apply equal standards to all forms of speech implies all speech is equal. By that logic, there’s no difference b/w someone using social media to incite genocide v someone using it to advocate equal rights. Is that really the moral position?
The idea that holding Trump & other fascists to account might later have negative impact on others ignores that it’s already been the case that Black & brown ppl have received unequal policing & banishment online. The only thing new is that they’ve finally banned Trump.
Instead of accepting that our destinies be tied to the fate of the fascist movement, the focus should be on making clearer distinctions between what should constitute violations of social media policies and what shouldn’t.
Trump’s tenure of being allowed to incite violence on social media for yrs followed by an 11th hour ban is not indicative of anything except his privilege as a wealthy, powerful white man. It has no connection to the experience of the average person except as a point of contrast.
Figures of the fascist movement who were much lower on the totem pole with much smaller followings & much less power were banned years ago yet Trump was able to carry on inciting numerous incidents of violence against others. He is not the emblem for a debate on free speech.
If folks are genuinely concerned about free speech—something that should always be concern—we should pause & ask why the convo only moves to forefront when a powerful white man has faced consequences for his speech & not when the most marginalized are silenced on a daily basis.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with usa is a failed state

usa is a failed state Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BreeNewsome

12 Jan
Capitalism does not exist apart from racism. Reducing Blk ppl to property is what gives monetary & proprietary value to whiteness. I will continue to argue that the overarching conflict of the modern world is whiteness. Ppl struggle w/ it b/c it describes the world order itself.
Whiteness is not a side issue. It is the umbrella issue under which all the other issues are dissected & understood.
Our entire understanding of the world, including the conception of Eurasia being positioned at the top of every map of the world is shaped by Euro colonization & the ideology of whiteness that accompanied it. It’s so baked into everything that it easily becomes imperceptible.
Read 4 tweets
11 Jan
Once again, Twitter is a privately owned software application. What law says that anyone anywhere is legally entitled to have an account?
This is not about free speech. It is about whiteness. If it were genuinely about free speech folks would’ve shown this concern for the targeting of leftists, sex workers & nonwhite ppl, not this one white man emblem of global white supremacy inciting terrorist attacks.
The fact that you have white people across the political spectrum running to the defense of a fascist who is arguably the greatest single threat to the safety & security of the globe at this hour shows yet again that the issue is WHITENESS.
Read 5 tweets
10 Jan
So again we’re going to make Black people the heroes of saving democracy only for the white establishment to turn around & take immediate steps to destroy it again. Y’all aren’t tired of this?
11/3/20: Black voters saved democracy!” 😄

*Trump & GOP try to overthrow election. White establishment focuses on healing divide w GOP*

1/5/21: Black voters in GA saved democracy again! 😄

*White supremacists try to overthrow govt. White estab focuses on healing divide w GOP*
1/10/21: Black officers saved the Capitol! 😄

*White establishment focuses on healing divide among itself by not addressing how president tried to assassinate elected officials*

US culture: Yay 4 Blk ppl constantly risking their lives for a democracy white ppl don’t want! 😄🇺🇸
Read 4 tweets
9 Jan
With exception of the most virulent, open white supremacists who don’t hesitate to make it clear that they believe in preserving white power, the defenders of whiteness will always engage in disingenuous arguments. We shouldn’t even engage them according to their false framing 1/
For ex. they will make bogus arguments about free speech, the constitution, etc. that they know are disingenuous & not representative of the real issue. This is a major part of how white power has always operated, w/ ppl feeling entitled to claim reality is whatever they say 2/
The whole performance around stolen elections is another example. It’s not that ppl genuinely believe election was stolen as much as it is that whiteness entitles ppl to feel they can declare whatever they want to be true w/ the expectation that society bend to accommodate it 3/3
Read 4 tweets
9 Jan
Another example of why the bipartisan neoliberal establishment which Biden embodies must be displaced from power. We do not in fact need a Republican Party. It is a fascist party, the majority supports the overthrow of the election & its leaders just attacked the Capitol... 1/
Biden is more focused on reconciling himself personally with his white former colleagues who’ve led an assault on democracy for years now than the immediate threat of fascism which is greater than one man named Trump. He displays no real understanding of the threat. 2/
This is a perfect example of what I mean when I say the bipartisan neoliberal establishment is more focused on self-preservation than protecting democracy or human life. They are obsessed with returning to a pre-Trump status quo that was financially profitable for them all. 3/
Read 4 tweets
8 Jan
Double standard: a rule or principle which is unfairly applied in different ways to different people or groups

Insurrection: a violent uprising against an authority or government

Terrorism: the use of intentional violence for political or religious purposes
Anarchism: belief in the abolition of all government and the organization of society on a voluntary, cooperative basis without recourse to force or compulsion
Fascism: a form of far-right, authoritarian ultranationalism characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition and strong regimentation of society and of the economy which came to prominence in early 20th-century Europe.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!