Want to know why America was the world’s exceptional nation? We were the first country where our leader voluntarily gave up power.
1/9
We built ourselves on the notion of win-win, in a zero-sum world. We rebuilt countries we liberated not occupy them. We did amazing things -- put a man on the moon, build bilateral institutions,
2/9
created the internet, fought for what was right, elected a member of a minority President. Our leaders were profiles of courage who put the country ahead of the party. Ours was the shining city on a hill because we settled our differences peacefully if imperfectly.
3/9
What happened on January 6, 2021, was done by the crowd who opines about America as exceptional. Their actions, however, were those of the unexceptional world our Founding Fathers tried to leave behind.
4/9
The one they vanquished when they wrote the words, “We the people in order to form a more perfect union.” The unexceptional who care so little about true meanings of the constitution they profess so much to love they cut the founder’s words short to just "We the people".
5/9
They think acts of sedition are those of patriotism, or to be glossed over. What does an exceptional nation do today? They hold those who stormed the Capitol responsible. Those who encouraged the mob to such treachery are removed from power forever @HawleyMO@tedcruz
6/9
For those who took an oath to defend the constitution – the founding father's dream and what made us the exceptional nation – and trampled it through silence, complicity, or expediency -- there must be a high price for such actions.
7/9
If ones aren't taken by those who desire to lead the Republic and the Republican Party (@senatemajldr and @GOPLeader ) which is responsible for what happened on January 6th through years of silence, complicity, and expedicney then we are not an exceptional nation.
8/9
Those who fail are not worthy of the people's house. They will, however, be fully deserving of how American history condemns and despises them for appeasing Donald Trump. That will be their legacies -- not judges confirmed or political victories -- and well deserved.
9/9
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Faith or Fear Thread – When Autocratic Verticals are Challenged
It doesn't matter what autocratic vertical it is. The one in Putin's Russia (currently under stress), Lukashenko's Belarus (cracking up), Xi's China (firmly in place), or Trump's GOP (it is getting nuts fast)
Autocrats have a singular objective – Gaining and Maintaining Power. They do this by "demonstrating inevitability and invincibility through fear." Structurally, they create a vertical with the autocrat on top and a vertical power structure underneath them.
There are six tactics. Autocratic actors use. They are 1) Big Ideas/Big Lies, 2) Disinformation, 3) Dependency, 4) Marginalization, 5) Divide and Conquer, and 6) Threats, Repression, and Violence.
In the weeks ahead remember the Seven Rules for confronting Autocrats & their enablers. We need everyone using whatever they can bring to the battle for democracy! Please share and I hope you will encourage others to follow me as I have lots of exciting stuff coming in this space
Given Don's little explosion over the @ProjectLincoln ad (attached in the following tweet), it's an excellent time to remind all of Rule #7 of dealing with Autocrats and their enablers. @TheRickWilson & the entire LP team live this rule each day.
The Ad, which if you have not seen, is a must watch and retweet.
Faith or Fear Thread: The Rules for Dealing with Autocrats & Their Enablers – J6 Committee Edition
Working around the world with those fighting for democracy, I understand we need Seven Rules for democratic forces to prevail.
Remember, all Autocratic illiberal actors strive solely to gain and maintain power. They do so by creating Fear of each other at the expense of faith in one another – think of what Putin is doing in Ukraine versus Zelensky.
For autocratic forces & their enablers, the game is zero-sum at the expense of the win-win upon which we build democracies. Win-win requires trust to achieve a sum far greater than the parts. Zero-sum has only one winner at the expense of all others. The Seven Rules are:
This by @JaneMayerNYer about the PR firm @zenogroup which is part of @EdelmanPR is a fascinating case study to me on PR firms, corporate America, and the political world we live in versus the one we have known. It is a classic case of misunderstanding democracy v. autocracy.
In a healthy democracy, you can have policy disagreements within a win-win system whereby not just political actors have power, but whereby many within society including corporations (as human endeavors) hold the rightful opportunity to advocate what they view as their interests.
In an unhealthy democracy -- where forces of autocracy on either or both sides are attempting to leverage power in a zero-sum game -- illiberalism and extremism infect all elements of the society. Zero-sum actors want to make every policy issue either-or propositions.
This by @OKnox@washingtonpost is something. He takes comments from the 90's by foreign policy icons on NATO expansion & wraps them into the Rand Paul/Russia line NATO is partially to blame for Ukraine
"Paul took some knocks on social media for seeming at times to excuse Russian President Vladimir Putin’s military action against Ukraine, Georgia, and Moldova by noting they had been part of the U.S.S.R. And blaming NATO enlargement is popular in Russia & among its apologists.
"On the other hand, one of the hardest things to convey to American readers is how other countries have their own perception of their national interests, and commit resources accordingly, quite legitimately outside of Washington’s globe-spanning influence.