- SPOOF WARNING -

I am completely fed up with these boloney crackpot journalists who have never published a peer-reviewed pangolin paper but write irresponsible articles about the risk of a SARS BatCov leak, with catchy titles and silly illustrations. Image
These conspiracy theorists don't know their Baiju from their Whisky, and just feed into the QAnon garbage that threatens our essential cooperation with China

"Be ready to fight potential risks from P4 lab" one these morons wrote.

P4s/P3s are safe. Zoonosis happens all the time
and represent the real risk. An accident in Wuhan could only be a zoonosis event, probably imported from abroad.

Shame in such a silly publication to print such rubbish with that silly illustration:
chinadaily.com.cn/opinion/2015-0…
At least in China they know how to deal with such irresponsible baloney - you won't hear that kind of nonsense. Image
That journalist from the 'China Daily' (must be another Epoch Times I bet) should instead leave the science (and the Baiju) to the scientists.

This irresponsible behaviour can only make the already difficult task of finding the non-Chinese origins of Covid-19 more difficult. Image
- SPOOF END -
Note: China Daily is an English-language daily newspaper owned by the Publicity (i.e. Propaganda) Department of the Chinese Communist Party.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Gilles Demaneuf

Gilles Demaneuf Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @gdemaneuf

11 Jan
Top prediction of 2020 from our greatest Covid19 expert:
Oh well, there is always comfort available.
And when it all goes to pieces, our good friends will point you to the origin of the epidemics.

We can then organize a few Karaoke nights in China to thanks them for their services.
Read 4 tweets
9 Jan
4 papers about the plausibility of COVID's lab origins have already been published in peer-reviewed journals, 2 more call for inquiry into the hypothesis.
However the WHO and in particular Daszak have already concluded that the lab hypothesis was not worth considering, without offering any solid argument whatsoever.
Read 4 tweets
30 Dec 20
1/ The recent AP article about the Chinese gag order on research results is nothing new (bit.ly/38IOy5g and documentcloud.org/documents/7340…).
@MarionKoopmans

However the AP reports misses 2 important elements:
2/ First let's remember that the ToRs (Terms of reference) of the coming missing stipulates that the WHO mission shall exclusively use research and data from the Chinese side. There will be no replication of the research or independent data collection.
bit.ly/380xEQr
3/ Which basically means that all data and research that the WHO mission will use will be vetoed at the highest level by the Chinese side.

So much for an independent and proper scientific investigation.
@MarionKoopmans
Read 11 tweets
11 Dec 20
1/ The WHO TORs (Terms of Reference) for the engoing investigation (5 Nov) explicitly back China's disinformation campaign and obfuscation about pre-Dec cases.

who.int/publications/m…
2/ Well done China.

As usual you are managing to get your fancy position written at the very beginning of all key WHO investigation documents.

The same happened with the Feb 20 joint-panel report, for each you argued over every single word:
nytimes.com/2020/11/02/wor…
3/ So here is the wording of the just released TORs:
Approach:

"Where an epidemic is first detected does not necessarily reflect where it started. An outbreak of pneumonia of unknown etiology was identified through surveillance in Wuhan, however the possibility that the virus
Read 9 tweets
1 Dec 20
1/ Dec 1st 2019 is a very important date in the official Chinese narrative. It's the date before which no Covid-19 case can be reported.

So for instance we never heard anything anymore about the Nov 17 case reported in the SCMP: scmp.com/news/china/soc…
2/ For Dec 19 itself China has long set the number to the few cases that were officially reported in the Lancet on the 24th Jan 2020.

Since then nothing new. Right, nothing officially found retroactively. it just stopped there to the few cases quickly identified in that paper.
3/ Actually the paper was likely published by bypassing the expected validation or relevant authorities.

The lid was quickly put back with all research having then to be officially vetted by Beijing.
nature.com/articles/d4158…
Read 11 tweets
21 Nov 20
Who would do that? Read.

1/ On the 15th Oct 2018, Peter Daszak was elected to the National Academy of Medicine. ecohealthalliance.org/2018/10/peter-…
2/ On the 19th Oct 2019, one year later, Peter Daszak was inducted to the National Academy of Medicine in a ceremony.
Big round of applause from his colleagues and contacts.
3/ On the 5th Nov 2019, only about 2 weeks later, Peter email Rita asking her to nominate him for the National Academy of Sciences.

Quote:
"As you may remember, I was elected onto the National Academy of Medicine a couple of years ago, but
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!