I am completely fed up with these boloney crackpot journalists who have never published a peer-reviewed pangolin paper but write irresponsible articles about the risk of a SARS BatCov leak, with catchy titles and silly illustrations.
These conspiracy theorists don't know their Baiju from their Whisky, and just feed into the QAnon garbage that threatens our essential cooperation with China
"Be ready to fight potential risks from P4 lab" one these morons wrote.
P4s/P3s are safe. Zoonosis happens all the time
and represent the real risk. An accident in Wuhan could only be a zoonosis event, probably imported from abroad.
At least in China they know how to deal with such irresponsible baloney - you won't hear that kind of nonsense.
That journalist from the 'China Daily' (must be another Epoch Times I bet) should instead leave the science (and the Baiju) to the scientists.
This irresponsible behaviour can only make the already difficult task of finding the non-Chinese origins of Covid-19 more difficult.
- SPOOF END -
Note: China Daily is an English-language daily newspaper owned by the Publicity (i.e. Propaganda) Department of the Chinese Communist Party.
4 papers about the plausibility of COVID's lab origins have already been published in peer-reviewed journals, 2 more call for inquiry into the hypothesis.
However the WHO and in particular Daszak have already concluded that the lab hypothesis was not worth considering, without offering any solid argument whatsoever.
However the AP reports misses 2 important elements:
2/ First let's remember that the ToRs (Terms of reference) of the coming missing stipulates that the WHO mission shall exclusively use research and data from the Chinese side. There will be no replication of the research or independent data collection. bit.ly/380xEQr
3/ Which basically means that all data and research that the WHO mission will use will be vetoed at the highest level by the Chinese side.
So much for an independent and proper scientific investigation. @MarionKoopmans
1/ The WHO TORs (Terms of Reference) for the engoing investigation (5 Nov) explicitly back China's disinformation campaign and obfuscation about pre-Dec cases.
As usual you are managing to get your fancy position written at the very beginning of all key WHO investigation documents.
The same happened with the Feb 20 joint-panel report, for each you argued over every single word: nytimes.com/2020/11/02/wor…
3/ So here is the wording of the just released TORs:
Approach:
"Where an epidemic is first detected does not necessarily reflect where it started. An outbreak of pneumonia of unknown etiology was identified through surveillance in Wuhan, however the possibility that the virus
2/ On the 19th Oct 2019, one year later, Peter Daszak was inducted to the National Academy of Medicine in a ceremony.
Big round of applause from his colleagues and contacts.