WTT MEDIA CLASS

HATE LIKE THE PRESS 101

Welcome to class everyone. Today we will learn 2 different kinds of news story. Then we will ignore the good one and go for the one that (if done enough) will create a profitable moral panic against transgender people. (Long Thread)

1/25
A "This is" story (the type we tend to do on our podcast ALMOST exclusively) explains an issue or specific event from a "this is" angle and reports what the SUBJECT is. This analyzes the SUBJECT of the story from as many angles as possible with evidence (sources, data etc).

2/25
A "They said" stories are entirely on what a selected group or person has said. What is said about the subject does not have to be factually accurate. A "they said" story is making only one claim: that a specific person said it. This story is easy, cheap and profitable.

3/25
A "They said" story must have 5 things

1. A statement that someone has said

2. Proof that they said it

3. Other views BRIEFLY at the end (which most people will not get to)

4. Lies that are presented as equal to the (optional) truth

And

5. Few/No Trans quotes or names

4/25
With this you can pretty much do anything. You can twist it to any political ideology you like. You can put this out in a broadsheet, tabloid, TV news segment, web article, YouTube video, Tweet or podcast.

Almost every transphobic news report fits a "They said" model.

5/25
Example "They said" Story

Lesbians going extinct due to people being trans

Subject: Transgender people existing?

Statement from: LGB Alliance

Proof they said it: Journalist interview

telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/12/2…

6/25
The Truth: Lesbians aren't going extinct due to trans people.

Evidence: ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulati…

ONS figures shows UK population percentage of gay men and lesbian women rise from 2014 to 2018

(Delete this if potential profitability threatened)

7/25
Counterpoints: Vague references to detractors near top. Quotes from 2 pro-trans cis allies at end

Bonus point: LGB Alliance allegedly cites studies showing elevated rates of autism in transgender people. They do not link/name studies. Are they good/bad studies? Who knows?

8/25
Bonus point: LGB Alliance claim to have seen a school class which is majority trans and has no LGB people in it.

Oh right, that is just going to be a fact in it now? That this happened? AWESOME!

Pro LGB Alliance bias established. Their word is truth now.

9/25
Number of trans peoples quotes: 0
Number of trans people mentioned by name: 0

This report successfully makes trans people a faceless, voiceless force. References throughout of 'clashes' with feminists. No details provided (physical? verbal? WHO KNOWS?)

10/25
After you have reported what was said you must inflate the word count. Thankfully you can just add 4-5 other "they saids" in the same story as long they are loosely connected. This story for example jumps from LGBA to OFCOM to JK Rowling to Suzanne Moore to Keira Bell!

11/25
This is a very useful way to turn a news report into a functioning piece of hateful propaganda that is immune to ISPO and the readers will believe this to be true. Lesbians? Going extinct? Morally outraged! I am Panicked!

NEXT: The Silly Famous Source

12/25
EXAMPLE - Silly Famous "They said" Story

JK Rowling says she got 3000 letters of support after essay

Subject - JK Rowling wrote anti-trans blog

Statement from: JK Rowling

Proof she wrote it:

standard.co.uk/showbiz/celebr…

13/25
The Truth: N/A

This story is JK tweeted words. The reporter does not have to prove JK received those letters. Only that JK tweeted those words. This is a unique privilege of the silly famous. Anything they say can be a story. Truth, lie, the reporter can use ANYTHING.

14/25
She may have got 3000 letters (likely she did).
But this is not the same as it being proven. The only proven thing is JK said she did. This is not the same as proof of 3000 letters.

A "This is" story on this would need the reporter to see the 3000 letters. But that's HARD

15/25
If you are wondering why Boris Johnson and Donald Trump have both lied and lied and lied for years this is how they get away with it. The media has a huge pro silly famous bias. HUGE.

But all news reporting is biased in some form. Unbaised reporting is a fiction.

16/25
Even if the bias is towards democracy, capitalism, the police, THE SILLY FAMOUS, football, even pro human bias counts...every news report is biased.

What The Trans has a pro trans bias.

The most insidious biases live in "unbiased" outlets. But they have them too.

17/25
Counterpoints: Vague references to transphobia allegations against JK. Brief mention of Daniel Radcliffe disagreeing at the bottom and a link to a story of trans authors quitting an agency they share with JK. (Again, most won't see these and they are tiny).

18/25
Bonus point: Another chance to include chunks of JK's anti-trans blog in the text which this outlet has been re releasing all week, profiting from a transphobes words again and again. This time JKs transphobic essay takes up about 1/4 of the total word count.

19/25
Number of trans people quoted: 0
Number of trans people mentioned by name: 0

BUT this is where we get to say "We are allies!" because we link to a story about trans people quitting an agency they share with JK! But they could only get that because, it is still about JK...

20/25
You aren't a silly famous person. If you say words, that won't be a story unless something extraordinary is happening around you (terrorist attack, you turn fluorescent, Groundhog Day). If you say something against a silly famous person, no "they said". You are nothing

21/25
JK Rowling however is SO IMPORTANT that anything she says will be repeated by VAST SWATHES of the global media for months if we can profit from it. Doesn't have to be true even. And if you try to correct it...we will just ignore you. Because, we are making money here.

22/25
BUT ANYWAY..this is how and why pretty much all of the UK News media bar very few exceptions are likely to mislead and incite hatred against minorities. "They said" stories are where moral panics come from. "They said immigrants are coming to steal our jobs!" is a CLASSIC.

23/25
Here is another classic!

"Christians say Labour councils want book about gay parents in all schools" + "Thatcher says children shouldn't have right to be gay" = Section 28

Oh that's right. You see, if you do this long enough...the government will legislate

24/25
And when they do, the process can start ALL OVER AGAIN. But, your target will suffer. But then, that's their fault.

Welcome to the free press.

Congratulations!

You have passed HATE LIKE THE PRESS 101. Please use this to spot awful shit and not create your own? Please?

25/25
@BBCNews You are in this tweet. Which line do you think you are?
Hi @HattieBrewis and @CamillaTominey. Used your articles as examples.

Think about why.
Pro JK bias kind of kicks off here. The report just trundles along taking JK's word that she got 3000 letters. Seeing as trans people don't get a look in...Jk Rowlings words are seen as truth. Our words don't get in the story.
@HattieBrewis I have more sympathy for your position because it just looks like you needed something to meet your target and you saw a tweet and came up with something.

But you used JK Rowlings claim, took it as truth and then republished loads of her transphobic crap.
@CamillaTominey, proven in the thread that there is no extinction event amongst lesbians. You just published endless lies after lies.

And again, talking about trans issues for this many words without speaking to a single one?

If you did a report on posties with no posties...
...thing is you don't get to be assosiate editor at the Telegraph unless you know what you are doing. I am a bedroom based amateur and I could spot it all in a few minutes.

I can't know this for sure. But if I had to bet....I would bet that you knew of all the inaccuracies.
And you sent it on went on Holiday knowing that you published lies.

Absolute lies.

And you justified it by saying "well other people said them."

THEN WHY SUBMIT THEM FOR ANY OTHER REASON THAN MAKE EVERY READER HATE US.

End of rant. Can forgive transphobia in a rush by mistake
Can't forgive you.

You know those homophobic reports from the 80's that shows up and everyone is like "I can't believe how bad things were?"

That is this piece, your name on it, in 10 years.
Only just noticed that only 1 out of the 5 "they saids" in a LGB Alliance headlined article are publicly gay.

GC gonna GC.

(Yeah, don't reply with that thing, I know but don't out anyone)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with What The Trans!?

What The Trans!? Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @WhatTheTrans

12 Jan
THREAD: Ann Sinnott, a founder of the LGB Alliance claims she wants to protect youths from transitioning

She doesn't believe it is abusive to breastfeed a 16 y/o

How many 16 year olds WANT to suck their parent's breast?

Source: buff.ly/39ngDiL

#childprotectionexpert
Those who breastfeed are often shamed by society for doing so "too long". This is wrong. Get your nose out of their business, weirdo.

But when the kid can drive to Tesco to buy milk with money from their job and they are still being breastfed?

That probably isn't their choice.
Also she believes that lesbians are being pushed to extinction by...trans people being a thing despite the fact that research suggests more people than EVER before are identifying as a lesbian.

This has been rising since 2014.

Source:ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulati…
Read 11 tweets
12 Jan
So the Gender Recognition Act is staying the same.

And GC/TERFs think they won the stopping of trans women entering women’s spaces.

They got to a draw and write it off as a win because they literally don’t know anything about their own fight!
It’s not staying exactly the same. It will be cheaper and you can do it online.

Some might say...the process was easier now.

Terfs: “YAY WE HAVE STOPPED TRANS WOMEN FROM PEEING! YAY ALSO BREAST FEED 16 YEAR OOOOOOLDS”
Seriously GRA reform was an offensive joke after a 5 year campaign by the media and anti-trans radicals that was always going to ignore non-binary people and everyday they don’t have recognition is a stain on this country. This is why GRA reform mattered.
Read 4 tweets
10 Jan
Here is a thread for trans people about how to start fighting back if you haven’t already (many of you have already, awesome, keep going!)

First thing, join any trans group near you. Doesn‘t matter what it is. Get in rooms (when safe) and get on zoom calls with other trans folks
If there isn‘t a group in your area, start one using the resources and skills you have. If there is nothing trans related in your area for miles, make it a social group. Advertise it online and offline. Many trans people aren’t on here. Find them.
If you already run a group, find other groups near you and introduce yourself to the people that run those. Befriend them. Talk to them. Exchange information. Help them out. Create a communications network between the different groups to co-ordinate your limited resources.
Read 14 tweets
8 Jan
A thread on how absurd the UK is on transgender issues and how the UK got so transphobic

In 2015 Parliament held an inquiry looking into the state of Transgender equality. Trans people of all stripes outlined many different problems across many, many different areas.
As a result Parliament created a list of recommendations including legal recognition for non binary people, gender recognition act reform, allowing 16 year olds to change their legal gender and reform of NHS gender identity services.
The government under Theresa May ignored everything that was recommended except for Gender recognition act reform. This act came into law in 2003 and gave trans men and women (but not non-binary people) the ability to legally change their gender on their birth certificates.
Read 73 tweets
7 Jan
@Rose_Of_Dawn blocked you a while ago because I was so repulsed at your views on so many in our community (Did enjoy how you called me a communist like it was the 50’s though). Maybe you will twist this into another example of how stupid most trans folks are. just read b4 u do.
I’ve talked to A LOT of former GC people at this point. And they always have something in common. they were looking for something after being treated horribly, and they tended to say something online, get attacked by trans people, then a swarm of GC people love bomb them...
..and then they become theirs until either they see how truly toxic GC spaces are and bolt...or they get cut off/abandoned because they aren’t useful anymore

dunno your story, don’t know if some version of this featuring the hard right is there. But if ANY of this rings true...
Read 7 tweets
28 Oct 20
Seeing SO MUCH MISINFORMATION about this new Transgender Inquiry.

Weirdly, and hilariously, in 2015 I was a video editor who ended up reporting on the first trans equality inquiry. I don't know everything, but I know roughly what this actually is. (RETWEET WIDELY) (Thread)
THIS IS NOT A PUBLIC CONSULTATION.

Let me say it again.

THIS IS NOT A PUBLIC CONSULTATION.

This is not the same as the 2017 cluster fuck of nonsense. It has potential to be super weird, but this is not that.
First myth that needs debunking. Liz Truss is not in charge of this inquiry. She is the minister for women and equalities.

This inquiry is being done by the Women & equalities Parliamentary Sub-Committee. This is a cross party committee of MP's.
Read 23 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!