PUB DAY! My book, Revolution in Development: Mexico and the Governance of the Global Economy, is officially out with @UCpress. Can I tell you a little bit about it? Thread:
The book argues that 20th century Mexican economists, diplomats, and political figures had a surprising influence on the design and reform of a whole host of multilateral institutions and agreements meant to govern international trade and finance from the 1920s to the 1980s.
Mexican postrevolutionary state officials argued for representation in international organizations and redistribution through multilateral institutions. From the 1920s to the 1940s, they effectively conceptualized and advocated for the apparatus of international development.
The book shows how, working in collaboration & contention with other Latin American and Third World representatives, Mexican officials demanded reforms to the global economic system that would channel the surplus capital of the Global North to productive use in the Global South.
But then something funny happened on the way to the developmental state: once capital began to flow from multilateral institutions like the World Bank, and Mexico reentered the international financial system, it abandoned its role as a reform champion in the 1950s and 1960s.
Thus, a project to radically reform the international economic system for the benefit of the poorer countries became a project to maintain the new, US-led status quo in international development. But this came to a head during the crisis of the 1970s under Luis Echeverría.
Echeverría tried to use the threat of radical Third World insurgency - including at home within Mexico - to convince Northern officials that his reform project was the only means to forestall something more revolutionary. This culminated in the "Carta Echeverría,"...
...the Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States - passed overwhelmingly by the UNGA in 1974, but rejected by the US & Western European countries. Echeverría tried to protect Mexico's access to foreign lending, but force reforms to int'l trade & investment regulations.
We know what happened next: Mexican debt ballooned, Mexico defaulted, and the institutions that Mexicans had championed as necessary for its state developmental project - like the IMF & WB - became key players in dismantling that project and overseeing the neoliberal transition.
This is the central contradiction of Mexico's 'Revolution in Development': the undying dream that with the right rules and regulations, global capitalism could be made to work for rich and poor, North and South. It's the central contradiction in development more broadly, in fact.
So the book is very much not a heroic tale of Global South resistance - even if that's how the officials who led it (and the artist who designed the image on the cover!) wanted to narrate it. It's actually a cautionary tale about development, reform, and South-South cooperation.
If this is interesting to you, I hope you'll read it! You can purchase directly from @ucpress with the code 17M6662 for 30% off.…
And I'd love to talk to your students, seminars, centers, etc about it! Get in touch here or via my JHU email. And THANK YOU SO MUCH to everyone who played some role along the way. I'm so grateful to my mentors, peers, archivists, and readers!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Christy Thornton

Christy Thornton Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @llchristyll

16 Apr 20
I was scheduled to give comments on this piece by my dear friend @dbessner & Fred Logevall at this summer's @SHAFRhistorians conference, which has now been canceled. So, a few brief thoughts on re-centering the US in the history of "the US in the world."…
I certainly agree that a key goal of the study of the US in the world should be to puzzle through the policymaking processes of US state actors, to figure out what shaped their decision making and therefore shaped US action.
But in my book, I question the framing that takes as its starting point the sudden emergence in 1945 of a hegemonic United States, able to impose a top-down vision on the world. This is a shared framework in a lot of IPE, IR, World Systems, and diplomatic history scholarship.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!