zara ♀ Profile picture
12 Jan, 9 tweets, 2 min read
I’m honestly just so sick to death of seeing hypersexualised female celebrities. It’s so, so damaging and to think that my nieces are growing up surrounded by it makes me worry constantly about the next generation of girls and women.
And it’s so fucking prevalent. Hypersexualised female celebrities are the norm, not the exception. Especially black/brown women. When I think about how every single Top 40 song sung by a female is about male pleasure, it hits home how profoundly mired in patriarchy we are.
Can we just have female celebrities that aren’t forced to sexualise themselves? Is that too much to ask for the diet that young girls grow up on?
Ariana grande’s latest album is *literally* named after trying new sex positions—for a man. The most famous pop song by women of last year, WAP, was literally about male pleasure and the lengths women will go to for it, and included the lyrics, “I wanna gag, I wanna choke.”
Don’t even get me started on the imagery. The music videos, the photography. The constant fucking nudity. The way almost every dance move is an allusion to sex.
And then society has the audacity to say to me that this shit is empowering? Sorry but my nieces are growing up on a diet of this shit, I cant afford to pretend for your delusions. It isn’t empowering. It’s misogyny. It’s male gaze that women have bought into because it’s easier.
It’s easier to buy into it than acknowledge the depth of the hold patriarchy has on us. The depth of how it deludes us into believing objectifying ourselves is empowering.

That empowerment is capitalism, even if the market runs on the principles of male pleasure.
These women are making money, so how can it be misogyny?

If the primary way women can make millions is to sexualise themselves, we haven’t progressed as a society. We’ve just managed to cover up prostitution in fancy words and designer clothing. Patriarchy has tricked us.
I cannot abide by this. I will not abide by this.

Internalised misogyny is real, and instead of accepting any “choice” a woman makes we need to be pointing out how damaging they are.

And whether they’re truly free choices, or “choices” manipulated by patriarchy.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with zara ♀

zara ♀ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @cache_pas

4 Jan
What if I only responded to TRA’s using quotes from 1984
“Elliott Page has always been a man, we’ve changed his Wikipedia page”

“‘Who controls the past,’ ran the Party slogan, “controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.’ And yet the past, though of its nature alterable, never had been altered.”

“...stfu terf”
“Trans women are women, you bitch”

“To know and not to know, to be conscious of complete truthfulness while telling carefully constructed lies, to hold simultaneously two opinions which cancelled out, to repudiate morality while laying claim to it...”
Read 14 tweets
28 Dec 20
It’s so revealing that “gatekeeping” is considered a negative thing in woke circles.

Part of my peaking was realising that, yes, some gatekeeping is vital. Ie, gatekeeping of “woman,” of “feminist,” of “lesbian.” Short thread.
But “gatekeeping” is also a fallacy designed to distract from reality. The assumption is anyone can be anything as long as they say they are.

The implication is that words have no meaning and anyone can be anything and who are *you* to say what this word means? Some woman?
How dare you gatekeep the word woman! How dare you suggest words mean things!

Well, sorry, words mean things. I’m gatekeeping. It’s my right as a woman, who has grown up female, to set a boundary, right here, right now.
Read 8 tweets
27 Dec 20
So a few weeks ago I asked for terf music recommendations, and I was inundated with suggestions. It took me a whiiiile to put it all into a playlist, but I’ve finally done it!

So, topping out at 10 hours, a Radfem + GC playlist made of your suggestions 💖…
It covers a huge range of genres and I cannot understate how much great new music I’ve discovered. It does focus heavily on rock, which is partly inevitable for a radfem playlist. But I def think there’s something for everyone in there.
I selfishly recommend playing it in order, as I’ve included my recommendations at the beginning. 😋💖
Read 6 tweets
22 Dec 20
There’s a lot of radtwt chat about focusing too hard on gender. And I get that. Sometimes we do. But the more I think about gender ideology and what it’s doing to modern feminism and women’s rights, the more I realise it is in fact the biggest threat to feminism today. A thread.
I say that because we are being stripped of language and concepts. If we don’t have the language to describe experiences rooted in misogyny, if we can’t say “women experience this because we are born women,” how can we accurately address *every* other issue we want to tackle?
Eg periods are stigmatised across cultures because WOMEN HAVE THEM. Period poverty exists because of misogyny. To describe this phenomenon and lobby for women requires the language “women have periods” or even just “females have periods.”

But we increasingly can’t have either.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!