#NowReading Outlines of American Political Economy (1827) by Friedrich List
I confine my exertions to the refutation of the theory of Adam Smith, and Co., the fundamental errors of which have not been understood so clearly as they ought to be. This theory furnishes to the opponents of the American system the intellectual means of their opposition.
It requires a mind of perfect independence to acknowledge that for so long a time we gave full credit to an erroneous system, particularly if that system is advocated by private interests.
Friedrich List
Smith teaches how an individual creates, increases, and consumes wealth in society with other individuals, and how the industry and wealth of mankind influence the industry and wealth of the individual. He forgot what the title of his book Wealth of Nations promised to treat.
Those who embrace the system of Adam Smith in its present imperfection leave their national interests to the direction of foreign nations and foreign laws because in a more perfect but entirely imaginary state of the human race, free trade would be beneficial to mankind.
They were a great people, in every respect in the way to become the first people on earth but they became weak and died—trusting in the infallibility of two books imported into the country, books the general failure of which was shortly afterwards acknowledged by every individual
As power secures wealth and wealth secures power, so are power and wealth, in equal parts, benefited by a harmonious state of agriculture, commerce, and manufactures, within the limits of the country. In the absence of this harmony, a nation is never powerful and wealthy.
Government has not only the right, but it is its duty, to promote every thing which may increase the wealth and power of the nation, if this object cannot be effected by individuals.
When 🇪🇸 was about to be invaded by 🇫🇷, Canning said it was against the law of nations for 🇬🇧 to interfere. He later asserted in Parliament that he played a trick upon 🇫🇷 by charging it with the occupation of 🇪🇸, to open an immense market for English manufactories in South America
The object is to gain productive and political power by means of exchange with other nations; or to prevent the depression of productive and political power, by restricting that exchange.
The more a nation is advanced in freedom, civilization, and industry in comparison with other nations, the more has it to fear by the loss of its independence, the stronger are its inducements to make all efforts to increase its political power by increasing its productive powers
We buy cheaper from foreign countries only for a few years, but for ages we buy dearer—we buy cheaper apparently if we estimate the prices in their present amount of money, but we buy incomparably dearer if we estimate the means wherewith we can buy in the future.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"Since Jews were not allowed to rent, they bought Lawndale--block by block--and they were thrilled to be able, for the first time, to do so. Their focus on acquiring real estate bordered on the obsessive and would play a major role in the success of the Supermob." --Gus Russo
Jefferson’s Secretary of State James Madison in 1803:
“Notwithstanding the just repugnance of this country to a coalition of any sort with the belligerent politics of Europe the advantages to be derived from the cooperation of Great Britain in a war of the United States at this period against France and her allies are too obvious and too important to be renounced…
“It is equally probable that a stipulation of commercial advantages in the Mississippi beyond those secured by existing treaty will be required. On this point it may be answered at once that Great Britain shall enjoy a free trade with all the ports to be acquired by the United States on the terms allowed to the most favored nation in the ports generally of the United States. If made an essential condition you may admit that in the ports to be acquired within the Mississippi the trade of her subjects shall be on the same footing for a term of about ten years with that of our own citizens.” founders.archives.gov/documents/Madi…
In 1800s Virginia, a bad system of agriculture and the force of habit prevented material improvement. Wealth was measured in land and African slaves. The land was poor and the slaves were wretched.
George Washington wouldn’t induce anybody to live in the southernmost states. Travelers observed the diverse culture of North Carolina with curiosity.
The bluff from Muh Values Republicans is that nobody will ever actually dare to trace the core ideals of our nation back to George Washington, where their political philosophy is clearly rebuked and rejected anyway.
You can know that Jeffersonian newspaper propaganda wasn’t the wellspring of original American ideals because of chronology and the prefix in the name “Antifederalist” alone. It’s not rocket science.
Since the first administration under the Constitution, democracy lovers have consistently undermined the American national project by flattering humanity as naturally good and then promising wondrous moral effects from individuals having the liberty to pursue their inclinations.
going to read some Othmar Spann and tell you what I find
justification of the seamy side of capitalism with inevitable defects
Socialist thinkers infered a communistic society from these evils
But in Germany another trend became manifest. Economists turned away from atomist and mechanist view towards an organic conception of society
Fichte left moral self-determination intact; but human beings, epistemologically considered, had become for him no longer individuals; they were members of an aggregate, parts of an organism established upon the principle of spiritual reciprocity