Epidemiologists should have said early on: this is a treatable disease, let doctors guide early treatments to save lives, transmission is not the issue with this virus. But they did not. They wanted fame & money for their work. They destroyed societies instead of saving them.
Epidemiologists put fear into doctors, which was the main reason for the first wave of deaths, not the disease itself. Thread
Epidemiologists are now barricaded behind the destructive narrative that they have created, and will not concede that it is early doctor's treatment & not vain attempts at reducing community transmission which can save thousands of lives.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Robin Monotti

Robin Monotti Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @robinmonotti

15 Jan
The evidence based science shows that medical face masks for the healthy do not alter rates of community transmission of SARSCoV2 while they contribute to the plastic pollution of planet. Cloth & masks of other materials increase rates of infection through nebulization spread.
"Speaking through some masks dispersed largest droplets into a multitude of smaller droplets..smaller particles are airborne longer than large droplets (larger droplets sink faster), a mask might be counterproductive."
advances.sciencemag.org/content/6/36/e… Image
Influenza like illness rates 3 times higher with cloth masks when compared to control group:
Prof. Carl Heneghan, Oxford University: "The high quality trial evidence for cloth masks suggest they increase your rate of reinfection."
Read 18 tweets
14 Jan
I’m not just a lockdown sceptic. I know lockdowns increase infections rather than decrease them because I read research first hand. I’m a citizen in a democracy who wants Government policy to be evidence-based, not epidemiological modelling based. Crazy, I know.
Lockdowns increase infections because they lower immunity & therefore increase the disease. After hospitals & care homes households account for the largest number of transmissions. Schools/universities act as a break in transmission of the disease. All evidence based.
Transmission does not mean infection. I can transmit SARSCoV2 but I can't transmit Covid19. Whether SARSCoV2 develops at all into mild or severe Covid19 depends entirely on the immune system of the recipient. Early treatment prevents severe Covid19, the right treatment cures it.
Read 6 tweets
13 Jan
What works:
Vitamin D
Zinc Ionophores

What doesn't work:
Face masks
School closures
University Closures
Stay at home orders
Guess which one of two sets governments are going for, the one that works or the one that doesn't? And you are telling me they want to save lives? Really?
COVID-19 outpatients–early risk-stratified treatment with zinc + low dose hcq & azithromycin:
Peer reviewed published study-

Covid-19 treatment protocol

Covid-19 prophylaxis protocol
Read 6 tweets
13 Jan
"Composition of the gut microbiota in patients with COVID-19 is concordant with disease severity and magnitude of plasma concentrations of several inflammatory cytokines, chemokines and blood markers of tissue damage."
"Patients with COVID-19 were depleted in gut bacteria with known immunomodulatory potential, such as Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Eubacterium rectale and several bifidobacterial species."
"The dysbiotic gut microbiota that persists after disease resolution could be a factor in developing persistent symptoms and/or multisystem inflammation syndromes that occur in some patients after clearing the virus."
Read 4 tweets
12 Jan
FACT: The PCR or lateral flow tests do not test for Covid19 nor do they test for even a single or even many SARSCoV2 particles or virions.
The PCR is meant to test for 3 single genes, or small sections of DNA, not even a single virus particle in its entirety. However, these fragments are not identified from the real virus, but in a computer model by 2 people called Corman & Drosten working in a psychiatric hospital.
Corman & Drosten, who work at Charité psychiatric hospital in Berlin, recreated what they think SARSCoV2 is in a model, not in reality, basing it all on a single Chinese study on paper from January 2020, which could be flawed or even entirely fabricated as far as anybody can tell
Read 21 tweets
11 Jan
If you told me in 2020 that in 2021 I would have only stayed on twitter to criticize twitter & that Angela Merkel would stand up for the rights of Donald Trump against twitter & the EU would be the only hurdle to a global tech dictatorship I would have said you were a fantasist..
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!