Pittsburgh is an American Apartheid city. Here’s the reality.

(2) As sociologists Nancy Denton and Doug Massey wrote in their seminal book, American Apartheid, “Although America’s apartheid may not be rooted in the legal strictures of its South African relative, it is no less effective in perpetuating racial inequality.”
(3) Pittsburgh, the city I love, remains one of the most racially segregated cities by neighborhood in America.
(4) Pittsburgh has one of the highest rates of occupational segregation between Whites and Blacks.
(5) Fetal deaths are 2 times more likely among Black women than White women.
(6) Black maternal mortality rate in PGH is higher than Black mortality rates in 97 percent of similar cities.
(7) More than 1/3 of Black women live in poverty in Pittsburgh. They are 5 times more likely to be poor than White men.
(8) Black men are more segregated to certain jobs, compared to the White male workforce.
(9) Black mothers are 3 times more likely compared to White mothers to give birth to extremely low weight babies.
(10) Black adult mortality rates are higher in PGH than almost every other similarly situated mid-size city in America.
(11) More Black children in Pittsburgh grow up in poverty than 95 percent of similar cities.
(12) Pittsburgh's White women make 78 cents to every dollar made by Pittsburgh's White men; Black women make 54 cents.
(13) White men and women are 3 times more likely to have a college degree than Black men and women.
(14) Pittsburgh has some of the highest rates of occupational segregation and homicide and lowest average income for Black men.
(15) This is America’s Apartheid. This is my city. While PGH is not rooted in laws like the former Group Areas Act of South Africa, the city has become no less effective in perpetuating racial inequity and inequality. The data does not lie.
(16) This is the fight of our lifetime in Pittsburgh.

Tweet 2: Denton, Nancy & Douglas Massey, American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass 15 (1993)

Tweets 4-14: Howell, Junia, Sara Goodkind, Leah Jacobs, Dominique Branson and Elizabeth Miller. 2019. "Pittsburgh's Inequality across Gender and Race." Gender Analysis White Papers. City of Pittsburgh's Gender Equity Commission.

Tweet 15: Tomlinson, Richard; Beauregard, Robert; Bremner, Lindsay; Mangcu, Xolela: Emerging Johannesburg: Perspectives on the Postapartheid City (2003)
I draw this parallel having done human rights activism in Johannesburg at the Centre for Applied Legal Studies and studied comparative constitutional law, race and housing with law faculty at the University of Witwatersrand School of Law as a Fulbright Scholar a decade ago.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Jerry Dickinson

Jerry Dickinson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JerrySDickinson

7 Jan
THREAD: Some quick notes on what the law says about storming the Capitol. You CANNOT willfully and knowingly entered or remain on the House floor, or any cloakroom or lobby adjacent to the floor UNLESS AUTHORIZED. It’s violent entry and disorderly conduct in violation of fed law.
(2) You also cannot enter or remain in the gallery of either the House or Senate in violation of rules governing admission to the gallery...
(3) You can’t do all this with the intent to disrupt the orderly conduct of official business, enter or remain in a room in any of the Capitol Buildings set aside or designated for the use by either House Member, committee, officer, or employee of Congress...
Read 9 tweets
28 Nov 20
Breaking News: Pennsylvania Supreme Court dismisses @SeanParnellUSA and @MikeKellyPA lawsuit seeking to disenfranchise millions of PA voters! This was the right decision.

Here it is: pacourts.us/assets/files/s…

I’ll follow up with an analysis below.
Here is the concurring statement from Justice Wecht. pacourts.us/assets/files/s…
Here is Chief Justice Saylor’s concurring and dissenting statement. pacourts.us/assets/files/s…
Read 29 tweets
28 Nov 20
The last week has exposed not so subtle efforts to subvert democracy in PA. Yesterday, a lower court signaled it agreed with GOP that mail-in ballots were unlawful (they are not). Today, a GOP member has openly called for the assembly to appoint electors to Electoral College...
(2) These are perfect examples of democratic “backsliding” as coined by Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt. These efforts of subversion are dangerous because they are typically legal, meaning they can be approved by the assembly or accepted by the courts...
(3) Further, this form of backsliding focuses on the ballot box. The goal is to, in bad faith, undermine elections by portraying the need for election reform to improve democracy, clean up electoral process and combat unsubstantiated corruption — ie sow doubt into the election.
Read 5 tweets
27 Nov 20
Just heard news that Third Circuit affirmed Judge Brann’s dismissal of Trump federal lawsuit seeking to upend the election. Another feather in the cap towards ending this post-election nonsense.
(2) Judge Bibas, who wrote the panel opinion, starts with “Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.”
(3) He ends the opinion noting “public interest strongly favors finality, counting every lawful voter’s vote, and not disenfranchising millions of Pennsylvania voters who voted by mail. Plus, discarding those votes could disrupt every other election on the ballot.”
Read 4 tweets
19 Nov 20
Nice piece by @JulietteRihl. This hits close to home. Over the last 15 years I’ve either purchased books for a few of my adoptive brothers incarcerated at SCIs or sent $$$ via JPay so they could buy books. 😔
(2) That’s the personal. Now, for the legal. As I mention in this article, “If the county was precluding free religious books altogether, then that changes the analysis.” Indeed, inmates have constitutional protections to read the text books of their faith...
(3) But, the US Supreme Court precedent, as of right now, says constitutional rights of prisoners are more limited than the rights of other non-incarcerated individuals. I don’t particularly agree with this as a matter of law, but it’s precedent.
Read 8 tweets
16 Aug 20
This happened outside my office @pittlaw today — potential violations of 1st, 4th and 5th Amend. rights to protest, violations of citizens’ rights against unreasonable seizures and violations of due process. Hell, throw in public nuisance & request injunctive & declaratory relief
(1) Individuals peacefully gathering on the streets of Pittsburgh to protest racial inequality have the right to gather and express themselves under the 1st Amend.
Unnamed agents actions undertaken with the intent of discouraging lawful protest and
therefore constitute...
(2) an unlawful prior restraint on 1st Amend. right of a Pennsylvania citizen to peacefully protest racial inequality. PA residents reasonably afraid of being picked up and shoved into unmarked vans by federal or state agents, may feel compelled to stay away...
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!