E. Rosalie Profile picture
13 Jan, 15 tweets, 8 min read
@jeffmason1 1/n I want to talk about why this doesn't hold up, @jeffmason1. Black Lives Matter and other groups protesting in 2020 never attempted to assassinate heads of state. They were seeking to uphold the constitution, not torch it. LEO response was so strong it violated human rights.
2/n The police response to those protests was so strong we had a hearing. Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Defense Secretary Dr. Mark T. Esper testified about the military role in wake of the killing of George Floyd. defense.gov/Explore/News/A…
3/n Milley said, "I have many policemen in my family, and I am personally outraged by George Floyd's brutal and senseless killing. The protests that have ensued not only speak to this injustice, but also to centuries of injustice towards Black Americans...defense.gov/Explore/News/A…
4/n..We, as a nation and as a military, are still struggling with racism, and we have much work to do." Milley said the vast majority of protests were peaceful. "Peaceful protests mean that American freedom is working." He talked about the response, too. defense.gov/Explore/News/A…
5/n Milley: "I...advised it was not necessary to employ active-duty troops in response to the civil unrest." "It was my view then and...now, that local, state and federal police backed by the Nat. Guard under governor" could handle the situation. So, what was the response like?
6/n An investigation through @amnestyusa found the response was not insufficient but so forceful as to violate human rights and elicit a warning against authoritarianism. The report includes these excerpts: amnesty.org/en/latest/news… ImageImageImageImage
7/n Amnesty's human rights legal commentary "Excessive use of force against peaceful protesters violates the U.S. Constitution and international human rights law. While the majority have been peaceful, police used disproportionate and indiscriminate force against demonstrations." Image
8/n There is also the self-identified Antifa man who killed someone over the summer. The president told an audience at a rally, in a display likely to provoke violence, that federal forces simply killed the man and never attempted to take him alive.
9/n Again the US lands on another list for not complying with standards in line with its own constitution and/or international human rights, which have been the same since 1950s. amnestyusa.org/issues/the-uni…
10/n The reports show people who lost eyes, and many people in media who identified themselves and who were assaulted. I spoke with a video journalist who was hit with a can of tear gas. LEO knew who he was because he works locally and has worked with them before. ImageImage
11/n 14,000 people were arrested in protests over the summer, but what's more important is your mischaracterization of the violent and most extreme behavior. Analyses of the violent events found leftist extremists, but that was not the majority. forbes.com/sites/robertha…
12/n Most worrisome was that there were also links between law enforcement and far-right extremists, in multiple locations, which is consistent with the FBI investigation into infiltration of law enforcement. ImageImageImage
13/n Trump's former Dep Chief of Homeland Security @NeuSummits who said, "We have the president not only pretty much refusing to condemn, but throwing fuel on the fire, creating opportunities for more recruitment through his rhetoric." npr.org/2020/09/02/908…
@NeuSummits 14/n FBI Director Wray also warned about far-right extremism being the biggest threat. DHS circulated a memo that said lone offender white supremacists and other lone offenders with “personalized ideologies” pose the greatest threat of deadly violence. reuters.com/article/us-usa…
@NeuSummits 15/n Another analysis of all 2020 violence found this. The response this summer was excessive, this threat was foreseeable, and the administration failed to respond to extremist threats. This stance reflects a negligent lack of knowledge or a bad faith deflection @jeffmason1 Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with E. Rosalie

E. Rosalie Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @NovelSci

14 Oct 20
1/n @ChuckGrassley responded to my objection to the rushed replacement of RBG during a pandemic, with Covid spreading like wildfire in Iowa. Since then people I love have fallen seriously ill with Covid. For his conduct, Mr. Grassley blamed the democrats in the last hearing.
2/n As a woman and someone who has been assaulted, I wanted that investigation as did millions of women. Not once did I get the impression you took it seriously. I will never forget how that felt. Retaliation against Democrats for investigating a credible sexual assault claim by
3/n ignoring the will of 74% of Americans, while presidential voting has already begun, and people are starving? I'm so grateful my grandparents who fled communism and believed in the US can't see this. Citing an R-senate majority, Mr. Grassley claimed to be following our will.
Read 8 tweets
5 Sep 20
1/n Reached out to some deeply conservative friends to let them know that I care about them and that I know they are better than their representative right now. One of them broke down and said she had defended so much for so long she doesn't know what to think.
2/n I said you don't need to jump ship. The current President has already done that. You need only have the courage to steer yourself back to the values you claim. I told her we need both parties for a healthy democracy. We need others to challenge our ideas.
3/n Both parties currently punish people who point out weaknesses amongst themselves. This does not encourage you to be better. If I may be so bold, seeking out critique is precisely that which allows for light-speed scientific progress. We look to our peers to critique us.
Read 10 tweets
8 May 20
1/n If your plan is to let everyone become infected, before pushing the vaccine--you're going to have a bad time. No one needs it anymore once everyone is infected. Now, if someone had a therapeutic they wanted to sell, and they held back a vaccine, you could argue that...
2/n Effective treatment is the one thing we don't have. You'd think a master plan would be more thought out since it reaches the ends of the earth and includes everyone in science, pharma, government, and medicine. They spent decades plotting this and didn't think that far ahead?
3/n To argue this you must tacitly argue that everyone in science is corrupt or not smart enough to see the truth. Also, why when people say researchers are hiding something, why not go make your own lab w/24/7 surveillance and prove it. Why not go elsewhere?
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!