Read the 'COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BioNTech' Rolling Review report. It looks like the mRNA vaccine has only been tested on young male rhesus monkey and rats. Severe side-effects have been observed (heavy weight loss within 24h, enlarged liver, etc.).

What are the experts saying?
Page 47: "Bodyweight (BW) and food intake: Exposure generated a slight reduction of absolute BW within 24h after 1st exposure (-6.8% to -11.3%; BNT162b2 V8) alternatively a weak body weight increase reduction [BNT162b2 v9]. No changes in food intake were observed."
Page 47: "At 100ug BNT162b2 V8 and 30ug BNT162b2 V9, the tissue at the injection site was thickened/enlarged with oedema and erythema at the end of exposure in a reversible manner. The spleen was enlarged (reversible) with up to 60% for both vaccine variants and doses."
Page 50: "It can be noted that in the primary proof-of-concept study, the use of juvenile rhesus monkeys with no or only mild clinical symptoms for the preclinical efficacy testing has limitations in its value as a disease animal model for human Covid-19 [...]
[...] (which is a clearly age stratified disease, mostly affecting the elderly)."

Wow - just wow! 😶😐😑
Page 54: 404 not found! (no risk management plan? really?)
Page 50: "In addition, the low number of animals of the male sex only that were studied only for a short time period weakens the conclusiveness of the study."

n = 6 (monkeys) can indeed be considered a "low number". What's next? Elderly homes?
The review report mentions "humans" several times, but I did not find specific data anywhere. The leaked documents contain many more data that I was not able to review. I hope experts in the field will give it a try and help to interpret the documents. We need more transparency!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Simon ツ

Dr. Simon ツ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @goddeketal

15 Jan
A very informative and evidence-based thread about on latest SARS-CoV-2 vaccines can be found here: justpaste.it/9lyb4

Complex issues are explained in simple terms. This document raises new questions regarding the safety of the respective vaccines. #UnbiasedScience Image
And always keep in mind: "You can’t sue Pfizer or Moderna if you have severe SARS-CoV-2 vaccine side effects. The government likely won’t compensate you for damages either."

Why is that?

Also, a compulsory vaccination would undermine any right to self-determination.
And this right is non-negotiable, especially due to insufficient evidence with respect to (1) side effects, (2) efficacies, (3) long-term effects, etc.

Recent leaked Pfizer-documents support reasonable doubts. The current public actions are irrational.

Read 4 tweets
14 Jan
The number of publications about the impact of #vitaminD on the #COVID19 pandemic is exploding. In the first 2 weeks of January alone, @Scopus recorded 29 new scientific papers addressing this topic. I'll provide you with an overview of the most cited papers. #UnbiasedScience ⬇️ Image
(1) Rhodes et al. (2021) observed a correlation between latitude and #COVID mortality rate. They state that "this supports a role for ultraviolet B acting via vitamin D synthesis". They strongly advise vitamin D deficient people to take supplements. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jo… Image
(2) Munshi et al. (2021) report that patients with a poor prognosis had a significantly lower vitamin D level and conclude that "diagnosis of vitamin D deficiency could be a helpful adjunct in assessing patients' potential of developing severe COVID-19." onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jm… Image
Read 10 tweets
5 Jan
1/ I am UNDER FIRE since I have written a post on the flawed peer-review process of @c_drosten's PCR paper. I will discuss some accusations in this thread and explain why the pure peer-review process window was even shorter than 2 days.

Yesterday's tweet:
2/ First of all, I want to state that it was not my intention to set off an avalanche. I simply could not believe my eyes when I saw how quickly @c_drosten's publication got peer-reviewed and published. As a scientist, it is my right and duty to address this and raise questions.
3/ Right after the thread went viral, I was warned by several people that I needed to be prepared for "Drosten's army" to attack me. Something I could not have imagined, as I have never received any shitstorm on the internet before.
Read 23 tweets
4 Jan
1/ I am an editor of a @SpringerNature journal and I will give you some more insights into scientific peer-review processes and why fraudulent manipulation with respect to @c_drosten's PCR paper most likely took place at the journal of publication @Eurosurveillanc. (A THREAD) Image
2/ As mentioned above, the number of days the "Corman-Drosten paper" (see link) spent in the peer-review process is TWO. Backers of the authors often come up with possible explanations, which I will debunk in this thread. eurosurveillance.org/content/10.280…
3/ The paper set out principles with respect to the PCR testing procedure and is therefore considered critically. An international consortium of experts & scientists have critically analysed this mentioned publication and have found several serious flaws. cormandrostenreview.com/report/
Read 25 tweets
1 Jan
1/ It has been reported that the number of deaths in nursing homes is remarkably high. It fits the media’s narrative to blame COVID for the high caseload. Yet, the problem is more complex and there are more factors that should be taken into consideration.
nytimes.com/2020/04/17/us/…
2/ Many countries have socially isolated many nursing homes in order to protect elderlies from the COVID virus. Having elderlies isolated indoors (especially during the summer) has an impact on their Vitamin D (an immunregulatory hormone!!!) blood serum level.
3/ A study from 2014 states that “Vitamin D deficiency was highly prevalent and associated with increased mortality among the elderly in Swedish nursing homes.” It can be expected that the vitamin D deficiency is even more serious this winter. eje.bioscientifica.com/view/journals/…
Read 10 tweets
31 Dec 20
1/ In this thread, I will talk about the principle of 'causality' and 'correlation' with respect to our immune system and the reputed #COVID19 pandemic and why we are on the wrong path. #vaccincovid
2/ In practical terms, 'correlation' means that there is a relationship or pattern between the values of two variables, whereas 'causation' describes the relationship between cause and effect.
3/ This picture illustrates both principles. In the past, people noticed that sick people often smelled bad, and they assumed that bad smells caused disease.
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!