Why would Capital or “Markets” select for Truth?
The Liberal conception of Truth is that it is the “prevailing market consensus”— this is why we “trust the prevailing market consensus”— but obviously, many lies are more amenable to social consensus than the truth is.
The anti “woke capital” ists who still think Markets select for Truth, believe that it’s just “those overly-socialized nuts who ruin a possible Truth Consensus”— market saboteurs, an informal cabal of “theocrats,” etc.
However— this was all answered long ago— by a guy named Jesus— who showed that markets actually select for Barrabas & scapegoat Truth in order to arrive at a consensus. The Market actually *destroys* Truth — because it kicks the coin changers from the Temple.
The rule of Truth is ever “in the next world”— because it doesn’t last long on Earth— the Market destroys Truth in the short term, but the Truth beats the Market in Eternity.
You can approximate the rule of truth by eliminating the need for social consensus— this is called “the mandate of heaven”— & it functions so long as the Sovereign rewards Truth & punishes Lies. By altering incentive structures to these— you can reign almost eternally.
Han Fei was right— there is no “procedure” without a physical embodiment of a unitary enforcer of procedure— “market consensus” does not police itself to accord with Truth— it, again, actively selects against Truth, scapegoats it, & furnishes itself with lies & mysteries.
The Rule of Truth cannot be accomplished without an Absolute Sovereign— because any other node of Power would have incentives other than truth— only the absolute sovereign is interested in truth.
Truth in Power is the Platonic Ideal of Statesmanship. Even in our folk mythology, God King Sage George Washington or Honest Abe “never told a lie”— this was said of King Arthur. We know all of this implicitly. It is itself a Truth beyond market consensus.
The main appeal of becoming the absolute sovereign is that you “get to know the truth”— we don’t have any sovereign because no one involved in the machinations of power knows “the truth”— power is not a means to wisdom for democratic politicians— who are incurious people—
“The Truth” is managed, like the atom bomb— nobody is allowed to collate it into one central knower— it must be compartmentalized & atomized into “facts”— which become the playthings of market actors— “we have these facts, you have those facts, no one has the truth”
“Decentralization” is the worst thing that could happen to the production of truth— Truth is Holistic, Total, not the diaspora of fragmentary facts cast into the wind. Truth is One, not Few or Many.
Any civil servant should forfeit the right to lie— any proven lie should be met with punishments. Let the commoners lie if it pleases them.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with R.Сам 🦋🐏

R.Сам 🦋🐏 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Logo_Daedalus

14 Jan
The real blackpill for american rightists is that there are absolutely no elites who aren’t embarrassed by the “folk culture” of america— & this is due to evangelical protestantism (which is truly an embarrassing “faith”) ghettoizing itself from all high culture.
No one with the intellectual capacity to govern a modern state believes in evangelical protestantism authentically— they “community organize” & show up— like going to the Iowa state fair for primaries— but it’s not a faith that can mediate a polity. It’s a frontier faith.
Evangelical Protestantism exists for “conditions outside of civilization”— even Mormonism is more coherent because it’s an American State Church akin to Anglicanism— & is itself the theological culmination of Evangelical Protestantism. Romney really does believe.
Read 24 tweets
14 Jan
Ah damn nick disappeared before he could call Rockefeller a fake capitalist— compared to— I guess— Mises?
George Soros— also cringe, so not a Capitalist— but Elon Musk? Epic Sci fi laser? Hecking MARS? Ok! That’s Capitalism! SKYNET— remember cyberpunk & jungle music & before ketamine sold out & became popular & commercialist (& therefore fake capitalist & probably communist)?
Global Governance of World Trade is the most Capitalist thing imaginable— maximizing consumption while decreasing life expectancy— also Capitalist! Hyperefficiency doesn’t mean “human fitness”— it means greasing the wheels with blood!
Read 8 tweets
14 Jan
Most people don’t want to read Joyce or Pynchon et al because they had classical educations & play with multiple networked allusions to obscure biblical, kabalistic, hermetic, pagan, historical, musicological, philosophical, etc concepts figures events & persons in a single page.
The Proteus section of Ulysses for example is a history of western epistemologies with extremely specific allusions that if missed render the whole scene pointless because it’s literally just about “becoming able to write/read such a sequence & understand it”
When Pynchon connects Wagner to the Third Reich to the Rockefellers to Auschwitz to Disney World in one scene— that’s a topographical map of historical developments which become meaningful when taken apart & put back together by the reader— otherwise “lol Rocketman stole weed”
Read 5 tweets
14 Jan
No one reads anything at all so most people have developed a form of discussion in which specific references to texts/authors are considered rude to the extent that the answers would require familiarity. Talking “around the books” is preferred. Talking about “your feelings” best.
You’re trained this way in school anyway— you don’t get asked “how does Faulkner develop the novel” you get asked “how does Faulkner speak to contemporary discussions of race & your feelings about that discussion” etc
The concept of formal rigor, or formal innovation/development, is considered a false framing, & that “development” is a critical projection that isnt evident in the text, & that all art is basically “intuitional feelings dumps” — the curtains are blue because he felt like it.
Read 6 tweets
14 Jan
The reason why “white male authors” & “boring white guy movies” are castigated has nothing to do with ideology & everything to do with the laziness of “critics” who need all art to be paced like an episode of The Office.
You learn this hermeneutic so that you can blackmail professors into giving you a pass for refusing to do the reading— that’s its sole utility in life.
I’m not doing the reading because it’s offensive to me that I was asked to— instead I shall explain why it’s counterproductive to do the reading when I could be scrolling my timeline & watching TikToks & “worrying about politics”
Read 11 tweets
14 Jan
See we needed Democrat Bush so that we could get Republican Obama so we can have Democrat Trump so that after that we can have Republican Democrat Trump & then finally what we all have been waiting for— Democrat Republican Democrat Trump.
Clinton? Don’t you mean Democrat Bush?

Obama? Don’t you mean Democrat Bush?

We got stuck in a cycle, but finally we can complete the system when we elect Democrat Republican Democrat Trump in 2036.
Democrat Republican Democrat Trump
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!