Thread: When did NPR merge with Pacifica? NPR's news shows have always leaned left, but I find now it's just propaganda, and I can't even listen to it anymore. They rarely have any guests with a non-left perspective, and when they do they grill them harshly (except for never-
Trump Republicans, but only when they are talking about how much they loathe Trump). Then they have their left-leaning guests who spout arrant nonsense, and then don't question even the most absurd and counter-factual statements, and instead give them leading questions
that even them to spout even more nonsense. Today they had a guest, a pediatrician who was very involved in activism about the lead in the Flint water supply, and who just wrote a book on the issue. The first question I'd ask as a journalist: is there any scientific evidence
that the amount of lead in the water supply caused identifiable harm to the children of Flint, as opposed to just being above regulatory limits? Of course, that wasn't asked. The author attributed the Flint situation, in part, to "neoliberal capitalism." The water system was run
by the Flint government, so it would be logical to ask what capitalism had to do with it, much less neoliberalism. Or how a socialist alternative would have prevented government corruption and incompetence. Nope. Then the interviewer asked whether this would have happened if
Flint had not been a poor, mostly-black city. The author took the invitation to talk about of course not blah blah blah. Now, a keen interviewer might have asked about the health crisis in rural America, with opioid addiction, a decline in the life expectancy of working-class
whites, and so on, and thus how we can distinguish a racial issue from the interplay of wealth, political influence and so on. But of course not. And of course, one has to question why a pediatrician, even one active in the Flint situation, has any particular insight into such
issues to begin with. This is hardly the only example. I've lost track how many times I've heard guests on NPR state, and hosts state or imply, that Michael Brown was "murdered," without any mention of the Obama Justice Dept. report concluding that the officer who shot him acted
in self-defense. I could go on and on. If you wonder why people who aren't on the left are driven to things like One American News, and you think it's solely b/c they are partisan idiots, think again. NPR has become a more sophisticated version from the left.
(Why did I listen even when it leaned left? Because despite that lean, I felt I was more informed after listening. Now, I feel that overall if anything listening to an NPR broadcast makes me less informed, not to mention that all the unasked questions and question-begging
is infuriating, why waste time listening to journalists not doing their job?)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Bernstein

David Bernstein Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ProfDBernstein

2 Jan
@Profepps @VolokhC Garrett, I'd be happy to send you all sorts of scientific citations from my forthcoming chapter on the issue, but I'm not convinced you would understand them, or if you did, whether you'd be willing to understand them.
@Profepps @VolokhC Ah, what the hell, just in case someone out there wants to do some actual research instead of being obnoxious and snarky.
@Profepps @VolokhC Javier Perez-Rodriguez & Alejandro de la Fuente, Now is the Time for a Postracial Medicine: Biomedical Research, The National Institutes of Health, and the Perpetuation of Scientific Racism, 17 Am. J. Bioethics 36, 41 (2017).
Read 13 tweets
24 Nov 20
@harryreis @kampeas If your prerequisite for a "just" resolution is the dissolution of Israel, and you don't have a plan as to how the Jews living there will be protected beyond the good will of the majority and paper agreements, then you may not be an antisemite, but you are ok with the strong
@harryreis @kampeas possibility of Jews in Israel facing the fate of, e.g., Copts in Egypt, Yazidis in Iraq, Palestinians in Lebanon and Kuwait--and Jews who lived in Arab countries before Israel was created. And if you are a Hamas supporter, you are ok with more than just the strong possibility.
@harryreis @kampeas People like yourself act as if "Jewish nationalism" is an abstract idea being debated in a Jewish youth group in 1912. There is an existing Jewish state with almost 7 million Jewish residents, the first time Jews have had the protection of sovereignty (w/ some minor exceptions)
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!