You've probably noticed I use YA as a catch-all insult for modern cartoons. I think someone asked me what it means & it hadn't occurred to me that it's not universally understood, but YA stands for "Young Adult" & it's a term referring to "Young Adult 'Literature’”…(thread)
"Young Adult" was/is a marketing term created to sell more books, and much like the "PG-13" rating for movies it's now reduced everything to the same lowest common denominator of immaturity by flattering average normies into thinking their taste is SO MATURE for their age
Before the PG-13 rating, movies were basically either for kids or adults. But over time, studios realized that by toning down the sex, violence & language a lil bit, they could get a rating which would mean more kids could buy tickets - so over time, movies for adults disappeared
This is partly why Capeshit came to dominate the movies; because it's childish enough for kids but by having just a few hints of adult content or themes, the over-18's could flatter themselves into thinking they were watching something more sophisticated & not just kid stuff
So, the YA thing - there's no reason you can't go directly from reading "children's books" to "adult books" except there was money to be made in inventing a new market - so "Young Adult" novels became a branding term & now, of course, stunted adults read them more than actual lit
Which brings us to cartoons - when you look at the western series that are promoted w/ marketing slogans like "Animation is for everyone" & "respect animation" - because they're supposedly appealing to adults as well as kids - they're just slightly edgy kid's fare. Like YA novels
I hate to be the self-hating western animation fan, but any anime fan knows that there's pretty much an anime show or movie for every age & taste - and there's even "family friendly" stuff in the true sense of the phrase, like Miyazaki films - sorry, but Gravity Falls a bit short
People like this are deeply insecure about how emotionally immature they are, and how their immaturity is reflected in their tastes, so they have to elevate these shows in their minds - "I'm not a kid, so if I watch a kid's cartoon, therefore it's NOT just for kids." how logical
I call them "YA cartoons" but tbh even teenagers are too mature to be taking them so seriously - they just don't want to abandon childish habits or ask why the industry can't offer better than Family Guy or stoner cartoons for "adult animation," so they become retarded Peter Pans
Of course, a lot of these YA cartoons' creators are just as stunted as their audiences, and deliberately cultivate such cultish followings from the TOO-OLD-TO-BE-WATCHING crowd, which leads to a lot of obsessive weirdos getting encouraged to be creepy (oh, & buy lotsa merch)
So as "Beanmouth" is the default art style for crappy modern western cartoons, "YA" is the default for their writing / concepts. U can tell right away when shows try 2 cultivate that emotionally-immature-adult crowd. I say, kids cartoons for kids - not emotionally stunted adults!
Yeah these seem like healthy shows for children & the adults who take them super-seriously, lol
remember, these fandoms need emotional porn in the media they consoom because modern society requires they suppress everything that makes them human (which is why they never grow up)
sry for the self-bump, but I neglected to mention Harry Potter - this is key to understanding YA as infantilization of art - a series designed to be read from childhood into adulthood, to replace challenging oneself with adult art...(con't)
...western animation fans pretty much only have anime & a handful of things like Ralph Bakshi films to challenge themselves with after adolescence...therefore as with Harry Potter, they like when the product they've been consooming "matures" to the level of - well, teen melodrama
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Fantagraphics & Georgetown Records Birthday trip report (this is an old pic, the weather sucked) 🧵
First of all, in a nice bit of synchronicity I've just gotten into The Roches & was going to check for Roches records at Georgetown & whaddya know, they were playing this album when I got there! (did not buy though)
This was the first record I found. Homer & Jethro were a kind of hillbilly musical comedy act from the 1940s-60s
It seems like a cost-efficient way to create quality "adult animation" in America would be for talented animators like this guy to just be let loose with clips from popular podcasters - of course YouTubers have allowed this for years, but I think only "The Ricky Gervais Show" has tried to do it for broadcast TV - it eliminates the expenses of the writing/development process, much like Reality TV did - but this would be for a good cause, because it would be an alternative to hack cartoon writers coming up with the umpteenth Adult Cartoon Sitcom. The biggest problem, though, is that popular podcasters need to have the good taste to want the animation to be more expressive than Family Guy (which to them might be more "professional" looking) - to check their egos & trust the animation won't "overshadow" them. I think the latter is the biggest reason why animated series created by comedians, like "F For Family," have really stiff art & animation - whereas you can imagine some talented animator having a lot of fun with Bill Burr clips if they were just allowed to go nuts. "The Ricky Gervais Show" had a similar problem - you can tell he wanted it to look "cartoony" but the animation direction was still really conservative; just a bunch of pre-approved expressions, nothing "off-model," no creativity.
Sven Stoffels' Chip Chipperson Podacast clips are good example of doing this concept justice - it's limited animation but hey, look at that - limited animation doesn't have to mean bland drawings
These are Joe Rogan's officially sanctioned animation clips from the JRE podcast - you can see the problem. Even when it's just one guy at the top, & not a committee of TV execs, that one person still needs to have good taste
In the future, more American animation will inhabit an uncanny valley where producers want their final product to look like both anime (because that's hip) & Disney (because that's "quality") without understanding the visual appeal of either
There have already been rumblings of this over the years of course
The optimal fusion of Japanese & American cartoon art styles already happened. It's not going to look this good again because American cartoon art doesn't have a distinct identity worth fusing anymore, at least not for action animation
Some of you guys are following this nut - sorry, but this is the only real filter anymore, because if you started buying into this ten years ago, & you weren't some impressionable teen but an actual grown adult already? You'll believe anything, & you probably have since then
"Hehe, Michigan knows that word" = "I grew up in the Midwest & it was still the 1970s when I realized I liked other boys. Letting BLM burn down your cities gives me some small measure of revenge"
Seriously what other explanation is there for this indulgence in casual homophobia from Mr. LGBTQ rights ally. He knows everyone on social media is calling him gay, so he's trying to deflect it back by using "gay" as a pejorative? How is that any less morally schizophrenic?
If they’re a good artist, I’ll keep following a cartoonist on here even after they tro0n out, but I gotta draw the line when they start drawing themselves as their new gender, it’s just too sad. Have to suspect there’s few cartroonists who don’t draw themselves afterwards, either
Getting some predictable replies for this one. It’s like John k respecter days all over again
Sorry it'll be 2025 soon & we're not humoring the psyop anymore which happened to go nationwide right after gay marriage was passed a decade ago & the leftist industrial complex realized they needed a new cause & found one to spiritually castrate young white males, including kids