The NRA files bankruptcy. Big Deal or Big Nothing? A thread. @SaysDana @CheriJacobus
First let's talk bankruptcy. What is it? You get protection from debts, but you have to tell highly trained federal officials EVERYTHING about your business and convince your creditors that you are being honest. It is a significant hurdle and requires you to reveal A LOT.
And the NRA has A LOT to hide. For instance, it is actually a complete fraud. It raises money from gun loving suckers and funnels MILLIONS to a shady "ad agency" Ackerman McQueen which is the actual thing scamming suckers for profit.
We know this because during a leadership squabble between Ollie "Felon" North and Wayne "Cynical Greed Personified" LaPierre, the NRA sued Ackerman McQueen accusing it of overbilling and then all hell broke loose. oklahoman.com/article/562880…
Among the entertaining parts of that pissmatch, was Ackerman outing LaPierre's summer "intern."
The WSJ leaked docs from that fight that showed that Wayne "Just Like Manafort" LaPierre spent $274,695.03 at "the Zenga store" in Beverly Hills, CA.
The NRA is operated as a fundraising arm for Ackerman McQueen. AM siphons off MILLIONS for "advertising" but uses sizeable amounts of that to pay lavish percs to McQueen and others. JUST LIKE THE TRUMP "CAMPAIGN." Board members and donors/suckers are kept in the dark.
If you dig this kind of thing, please follow. I use my political/legal commentary as a way to trick people into listening to my music.
The Ackerman McQueen/LaPierre situation is what caught the eye of the NYAG resulting in a suit to eliminate their charity status in NY. Eliminating that status would eliminate the NRA and force it to reorganize elsewhere, if it can. ag.ny.gov/sites/default/…
As described by the NYAG, LaPierre and his hand-picked minions created a scheme to pay themselves while avoiding oversight of the NRA board and income tax. Because they are criminals.
The NY complaint is significant, but I will skip to the relief sought - all of which is entirely justified by the facts: First - dissolve the NRA and require all future assets be used for its charitable mission.
Declare that the insiders and board members LOOTED THE NRA (which they have always done)
Toss LaPierre in the garbage and ban him from all future charitable activity.
Require LaPierre and his minions to pay back the millions they looted
And this is a big one - require the NRA to account (which is to exhaustively explain) where it spent all the money it raised - AND where it got that money).
Now I haven't looked at the bankruptcy filings (yet), but I can GUARANTEE that a bankruptcy trustee and federal bankruptcy aren't going to look at those allegations and just allow the NRA to wash its hands and move to Texas.

Dirk out

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dirk Schwenk (Esq) 🎵

Dirk Schwenk (Esq) 🎵 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DirkSchwenk

15 Jan
When my paranoia/contrariness spikes, I tend to want to write threads explaining why all of twitter is wrong about @RodRosenstein. This is especially true when @comey says insane shit like Biden should pardon Trump. A thread.
I tag @File411 here, because I respect her views always and forever, and she generally disagrees with my perspective that RR is a straight shooting do gooder that did his best to prosecute Flynn, Manafort, Stone, etc., under insanely adverse circumstances.
@File411 bird-dogged this new DOJ IG report on child separation, which reflects on all ALL DOJ leadership 2017-2020. oig.justice.gov/sites/default/…
Read 29 tweets
13 Jan
It's been a while since I uttered the phrase HOLY SHIT BALLS but at 12:40 Rep Sherrill says she SAW other members of congress giving RECONNAISSANCE tours of the Capitol on Jan 5 TO RIOTERS. amp.northjersey.com/amp/6648386002…
Members of Congress helping rioters overcome House defenses - that would qualify as A MUCH BIGGER SITUATION.
This would give LEGITIMATE concern that a Representative bringing a weapon to the Capitol might be a danger to other government officials. And herself.
Read 7 tweets
11 Jan
Things we need to know:

1) why didn't a single member of the USCP use deadly force?

2) who exactly have the orders that resulted in only 500 of the 2000 USCP officers to be at the Capitol?
3) Who lifted the standard prohibitions against backpacks and flagpoles at the Jan. 6 demonstration?

4) Why has no federal official briefed the press on ANYTHING having to do with attack or aftermath?
5) What warnings were given (or not given) to the USCP re: armed attackers prior to the 6th?

6) What role did the new Trump actors play in the DOD, DHS and DOJ, in the days before the 6th?
Read 15 tweets
3 Jan
It's time to settle this once and for all. What is the best kind of bird. Back up your answer. You too @JarBomb @Northern_Ozbird
I offer two, first the pileated wood pecker, which is bad ass it tears down entire trees with its head and laughs at you while it does.
Second, the Black Vulture, which has an awesomely pirate name and a black leather head. It flies like shit and eats death.
Read 11 tweets
1 Jan
For 2021 I'd like it if we stopped accusing people of racism for saying a Black person is articulate
For 2021 I'd like everyone to admit peas, outside of their delicious pod, are disgusting and not food.
For 2021 I'd like everyone to admit that the Patriots are the cheatingest franchise in the history of all pro sports and probably had Putin hack their opponents.
Read 14 tweets
30 Dec 20
Trump REALLY stepped in it calling for repeal of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. He doesn't listen to lawyers, so I can see how he made the mistake - a quick thread
Sect 230 shields social media companies from liability for if they "in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable."
Google, Twitter, Facebook, etc., have cited this law in taking Trumpists off line for lying, doxxing and inciting violence - Trump hates that, of course.
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!