Jason Hickel Profile picture
Jan 18, 2021 15 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Remarkably, Sri Lanka has a life expectancy that's similar to the USA (shy by a year and a half) with a staggering 88% less resource use and 94% less emissions on a per capita basis.
These metrics are consumption-based:

Raw material consumption:
USA: 32.36 tons per person
Sri Lanka: 3.88 tons per person

CO2 emissions:
USA: 18.35 tons per person
Sri Lanka: 1.03 tons per person
By the way, Sri Lanka has a free, universal public healthcare system.
This thread continued: "To put this in perspective, if the world were to converge to Sri Lanka, global average life expectancy would increase by 4.5 years, while global resource use would fall by 80%, and global emissions would fall by 70%." See below for more:
The purpose of this thread was to highlight what the people of Sri Lanka have managed to achieve in terms of human development, against extraordinary odds. Note: As of this year, life expectancy in Sri Lanka is higher than it is in the USA.
Scholars of international development have remarked on Sri Lanka's performance for decades, beginning with Amartya Sen in the 1980s: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12339005/
The tweet above was meant to illustrate this with reference to the global scale. Right-wing accounts used screenshots, out of context, to imply, without evidence, that Sri Lanka - which is presently suffering a brutal crisis - is some kind of degrowth ideal. This is absurd.
The thread does not state this, I don't believe this, and it's nowhere evident in my work. I deleted the tweet to prevent its misuse until I could write more. But of course this didn't dissuade these accounts, which are clearly uninterested in the scientific scholarship.
I have always been clear: no country meets human needs within planetary boundaries - including Sri Lanka. The existing economic system fails to achieve this basic goal. Our published research has demonstrated this several times. nature.com/articles/s4189…
So, we need to change the economic system. The present crisis in Sri Lanka urgently underscores the need for this - at the national level but also at the global level:
Sri Lanka's development has been impeded by an export dependency imposed by colonialism, several decades of neoliberal structural adjustment programmes imposed by the IMF and, tipping the scales into the present crisis, an authoritarian right-wing regime. theconversation.com/whats-happenin…
Furthermore, as a result of structural adjustment and other pressures imposed by the institutions that govern international finance and trade, Sri Lanka - like other global South countries - is subject to drain through unequal exchange: sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
I have been at pains to point out that Sri Lanka, and other nations like it, need to increase their use of energy and resources in order to achieve development objectives. Doing this requires breaking free from domination by foreign capital. newint.org/features/2021/…
The impulse among tweeters in the imperialist states to point mockingly to global South countries as "basket-cases" is really horrific. The people of Sri Lanka deserve our support and solidarity in calling for - and organizing to achieve - a more just economic system.
And for those who care to read about what degrowth and post-growth scholarship actually argues needs to happen in rich countries, here is one place to start (and here is a free PDF: jasonhickel.org/s/Hickel-et-al…): nature.com/articles/s4156…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jason Hickel

Jason Hickel Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jasonhickel

Feb 27
We have *extraordinary* productive capacities. We can do virtually anything. Renewable energy? Integrated public transit? Regenerative farming? High-quality affordable housing for all? DONE. But we are prevented from doing these things because they are not profitable to capital.
Medicines to end preventable diseases. Universal public healthcare. Insulated buildings. High-efficiency appliances in every household...

We live in a *shadow* of the society we could have because we do not have democratic control over finance and production.
We face mass deprivation, human misery and ecological crisis all around us. All of it totally unnecessary. And we are told to believe that this is somehow natural and "normal". It's wild.
Read 7 tweets
Feb 27
Major investors like BlackRock and JPMorgan have pulled out of Climate Action commitments because they can achieve higher profits doing fossil fuels and emissions. A clear reminder that capitalism cannot achieve green transition with the necessary speed. ft.com/content/ab26da…
Renewables are cheap. Rapid decarbonization can be achieved. But affordability and feasibility are not what matters to capital. What matters is profits. They will invest in whatever is most profitable, and all of us are hostage to their insane logic.
It is critical to understand: finance represents power over our collective productive capacities - *our* labour and resources. With these capacities we can easily solve social & ecological problems. But we are prevented from doing so because capital directs our efforts elsewhere.
Read 10 tweets
Jan 26
Did capitalist reforms reduce extreme poverty in China? New empirical data suggests the opposite. In the 1980s, socialist China had some of the lowest rates of extreme poverty in the periphery, while the capitalist reforms caused poverty to increase. theconversation.com/chinas-capital…
Image
Scholars have long argued that the World Bank's $1.90 method suffers from a significant limitation, as it does not tell us whether people can actually afford essential goods (food, shelter, clothing, fuel), whose prices may move differently to the rest of the economy.
To overcome this limitation, we need to measure incomes against the cost of basic needs. This is a more robust approach.

With this method, we see that China's public provisioning systems ensured that even low-income people could access essential goods.
Read 8 tweets
Jan 3
Here’s a quick roundup of highlights from research we published in 2023, on climate change, capitalism, colonialism, degrowth and post-capitalist futures. As always, free PDFs are available via the link at the end of the thread. 🧵
1) This one is my top highlight. Rich countries have dramatically exceeded their fair-shares of the carbon budget for 1.5°C. In a zero-by-2050 scenario they will owe $192 trillion to global South countries in compensation for atmospheric appropriation. nature.com/articles/s4189…
2) Rich countries and elites are overwhelmingly responsible for excess emissions, but communities in the global South—and racially minoritized groups within nations—face a disproportionate burden of illness and mortality due to climate change. sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
Read 17 tweets
Dec 28, 2023
Thanks to a lot of tech bros and economists getting Very Upset about degrowth, this article is now the number one trending publication at Nature. nature.com/articles/d4158…
I mean, the authors of this piece wrote totally obscene things like "Wealthy economies should scale down destructive and unnecessary forms of production to reduce energy and material use, and focus economic activity around securing human needs and well-being." Heretics, all.
But, but... but what about technology!

Yeah mate we like technology too. We also like a habitable planet. And we don't like imperialism. All of these things can go together. monthlyreview.org/2023/07/01/on-…
Image
Read 6 tweets
Dec 22, 2023
"Those who wish to unleash technological innovation and production to achieve ecological objectives often hitch this dream to the wagon of capitalist growth.  But in fact capitalism and growthism *limit* what we can achieve."
jasonhickel.org/blog/2023/12/2…
"Scaling down less-necessary production liberates productive capacities (factories, labour, materials) which can then be remobilized to do the production and innovation required for rapid decarbonization."
"A degrowth scenario is not a “smaller economy” (i.e., a low-capacity economy).  It is a high-capacity economy which is reducing less-necessary production, and therefore is suddenly endowed with spare capacity than can be redirected for necessary purposes."
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(