There's a particular kind of romantic partnership, with a certain sort of person, that I've wanted since I became a self-aware, directed agent at around age 15.
Empirically, this kind of relationship has been hard to achieve. It hasn't worked out yet, at least.
And this sometimes leaves me wondering if my standards are unreasonable.
In years past that desire was often very alive.
These days, I'm rarely directly or viscerally in contact with it.
I sometimes contemplate aiming for some other kind of romantic and/or sexual relationship instead. In part because I might be more effective if I...I don't know, got laid more? But that's not really the thing. More like, if I had someone around whom I could regularly relax.
But mostly, I don't pursue those alternative relationship-setups out of a sense of something like loyalty to myself + a vague sense of wrongness and/or sadness about it. It often feels like giving up or giving in.
[I might elaborate on the wrongness sometime.]
(That said, it varies. I have felt more inclination toward dating people, in the sense of going out on dates with people with whom I am almost certainly not going to partner with, this year, compared to most years.
All of this is still reasonably fluid.)
But then, periodically, for some reason or another, I'll reconnect with the thing that I'm wanting in a visceral way.
And then I'll have a moment of "Ohhh...Yeah, THAT thing. THAT's what I care about. I want THAT." I feel the aliveness and open goodness that motivated my younger self.
All the other "options" pale markedly in comparison. It becomes obvious that they're not what I want.
Furthermore, when I am in touch with this desire, I feel slightly baffled that this seems so hard, and that it hasn't panned out yet.
It seems so...obvious, or in some sense, ordinary. It feels like it should be...well, not easy, but not crazily hard.
It seems like, there ought to be lots of people who want what I want. Not even close to the majority of people. But lots.
And then I feel confused that I've been going around in the world for more than a decade and I've had so few hits. It's not clear if I've ever gotten close.
I feel sort of like the world is trying to gaslight me into thinking the sort of partnership that I want is a pipe-dream.
And then I have moments when I "wake up", and I re-realize, that
No, it's the world that's crazy, the thing that I want is obviously Good and obviously worth guarding.
There is goodness and beauty that is worthy of love and committed-service.
The thing that I'm longing for is real. I'm not just hallucinating.
There's something that my love is FOR.
And, OBVIOUSLY, don't ape love of things that aren't worthy of it, for the sake of convenience.
I SHOULDN'T follow false gods because maybe they're the only ones there are. There's something that's not false.
And then I'll loose touch with it again.
And I'll stubbornly persist in half-heartedly seeking the thing, without really feeling why, mostly on the basis of a trust that the other time-slices of me are on to something real.
. . .
But this still leaves me with a hard problem of figuring out how to make it work out. How do I find and make the thing that I'm wanting?
What should I do? What should I try?
And additionally, what sort of "stance" should I have towards this?
Maybe I should maintain resolve and never give up until I find a way.
Maybe I should be "optimistic." Trust that it will work out, and doors will open.
But hope is painful. So, Maybe I should mostly live in the world where it doesn't work out, but continue to take steps anyway?
Maybe I need to be coming from a place of Surrender. (That IS what the trope book says.)
And all this also (maybe) leaves me with the problem of how to have meaningful companionship in the meantime.
(Or possibly "have meaningful companionship ever", depending on when the world ends. All of this has a somewhat different tenor when I consider that this might be my last decade on earth, and I ask, given that, how I want to spend it.)
These days, the main constraint on who I'm willing to date is "Do they have the necessary virtue and internal 'infrastructure', such that they can hold up their end of the connection, so that we can be fully honest with each other?"
(Because, in general, I'm not willing to warp my perceptions by pretending to believe things that I don't as a way to avoid tripping on the insecurities of people who are closest to me.)
But more specifically, I need to be transparent about this particular thing, because I'm not willing to loose track of the-thing-that-I-want by engaging in some other mode.
Which can be brutal, and is off the table if the person can't own their end of the connection.
@threadreaderapp
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
My first, perhaps unflattering, thought is that males, on average, have a stronger internal sense of personal gender identity than females, who's sense of gender identity is more fluid and more socially informed.
More transwomen knew recognized that, before it was in the social mileue as an option.
I wonder if the reason why many people learn that it is more authentic and alive to trust their heart, rather than their own reason, is because their mind is pwned by parasitic memes that aren't aligned with their interests.
If you can't trust your own reasoning, because it's been coopted by a bunch of ideologies that are out to get you to various extents, and you're not smart enough (relative to those memes) to reason your way out of those errors, it probably DOES...
...work better to do "what feels right", even though the heart center has a lot less expressive capacity than the mind (the most complicated it is able to represent is much simpler).
#EconQuestion Why does anyone think that increasing aggregate demand stimulates the economy, on net?
True, if more people are spending, that's more revenue for businesses, and more dollars flowing through the economy.
But spending trades of directly with saving, which (if people are investing, or at least keeping their money in banks) flows through the economy as investment.
And a society saving more and spending less will have cheaper credit.
Overall, it seems better for the long run health and growth of a society for more resources to flow to investment than to consumption. Investment (generally) builds on itself more than consumption does.
Do we know how many standard deviations on the human IQ bell curve, the average chimpanzee is?
Or is that an ill-defined question because the cognitive profile of chimpanzees are so different from humans that using a standard psychometric battery on a chimp doesn't give a meaningful "IQ" number.
(I've heard that chimps have superhuman working memory, for instance, which suggests the psychometric sub-score pattern for a chimp will be extremely unusual compared to the human population.)
@ESYudkowsky, I think you've said that voting is the real life example of Logical Decision Theory in action.
(Quickly searching your facebook posts, I didn't find the citation, so maybe I'm mistaken and you never actually said that?)
My understanding of the argument: one person's vote has an insignificant causal impact on the outcome of an election. But it makes sense to vote anyway, because your decision to vote and decision of who to vote for, is an algorithm instantiated across many voters.
(Or your algorithm is one of reference class of algorithms that are sufficiently similar that they have correlated outputs, even if they don't have literally identical outputs.)