There's a particular kind of romantic partnership, with a certain sort of person, that I've wanted since I became a self-aware, directed agent at around age 15.
Empirically, this kind of relationship has been hard to achieve. It hasn't worked out yet, at least.
And this sometimes leaves me wondering if my standards are unreasonable.
In years past that desire was often very alive.
These days, I'm rarely directly or viscerally in contact with it.
I sometimes contemplate aiming for some other kind of romantic and/or sexual relationship instead. In part because I might be more effective if I...I don't know, got laid more? But that's not really the thing. More like, if I had someone around whom I could regularly relax.
But mostly, I don't pursue those alternative relationship-setups out of a sense of something like loyalty to myself + a vague sense of wrongness and/or sadness about it. It often feels like giving up or giving in.
[I might elaborate on the wrongness sometime.]
(That said, it varies. I have felt more inclination toward dating people, in the sense of going out on dates with people with whom I am almost certainly not going to partner with, this year, compared to most years.
All of this is still reasonably fluid.)
But then, periodically, for some reason or another, I'll reconnect with the thing that I'm wanting in a visceral way.
And then I'll have a moment of "Ohhh...Yeah, THAT thing. THAT's what I care about. I want THAT." I feel the aliveness and open goodness that motivated my younger self.
All the other "options" pale markedly in comparison. It becomes obvious that they're not what I want.
Furthermore, when I am in touch with this desire, I feel slightly baffled that this seems so hard, and that it hasn't panned out yet.
It seems so...obvious, or in some sense, ordinary. It feels like it should be...well, not easy, but not crazily hard.
It seems like, there ought to be lots of people who want what I want. Not even close to the majority of people. But lots.
And then I feel confused that I've been going around in the world for more than a decade and I've had so few hits. It's not clear if I've ever gotten close.
I feel sort of like the world is trying to gaslight me into thinking the sort of partnership that I want is a pipe-dream.
And then I have moments when I "wake up", and I re-realize, that
No, it's the world that's crazy, the thing that I want is obviously Good and obviously worth guarding.
There is goodness and beauty that is worthy of love and committed-service.
The thing that I'm longing for is real. I'm not just hallucinating.
There's something that my love is FOR.
And, OBVIOUSLY, don't ape love of things that aren't worthy of it, for the sake of convenience.
I SHOULDN'T follow false gods because maybe they're the only ones there are. There's something that's not false.
And then I'll loose touch with it again.
And I'll stubbornly persist in half-heartedly seeking the thing, without really feeling why, mostly on the basis of a trust that the other time-slices of me are on to something real.
. . .
But this still leaves me with a hard problem of figuring out how to make it work out. How do I find and make the thing that I'm wanting?
What should I do? What should I try?
And additionally, what sort of "stance" should I have towards this?
Maybe I should maintain resolve and never give up until I find a way.
Maybe I should be "optimistic." Trust that it will work out, and doors will open.
But hope is painful. So, Maybe I should mostly live in the world where it doesn't work out, but continue to take steps anyway?
Maybe I need to be coming from a place of Surrender. (That IS what the trope book says.)
And all this also (maybe) leaves me with the problem of how to have meaningful companionship in the meantime.
(Or possibly "have meaningful companionship ever", depending on when the world ends. All of this has a somewhat different tenor when I consider that this might be my last decade on earth, and I ask, given that, how I want to spend it.)
These days, the main constraint on who I'm willing to date is "Do they have the necessary virtue and internal 'infrastructure', such that they can hold up their end of the connection, so that we can be fully honest with each other?"
(Because, in general, I'm not willing to warp my perceptions by pretending to believe things that I don't as a way to avoid tripping on the insecurities of people who are closest to me.)
But more specifically, I need to be transparent about this particular thing, because I'm not willing to loose track of the-thing-that-I-want by engaging in some other mode.
Which can be brutal, and is off the table if the person can't own their end of the connection.
@threadreaderapp
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Do I know anyone who participated in a 24/7 D/s relationship where the sub was *markedly* smarter than the dom?
I'm interested in what's psychologically appealing about these relationships. On the sub side, it seems like it's often a comforting release of control to someone else, coupled with a strong personal respect for the dom.
How does that work (or does it) when the sub is substantially smarter than the dom and knows it?
Also, I took two tests and got markedly different scores on each.
A 20+ point differences in my results for extraversion and openness, and a 50(!) point difference in my results on conscientiousness, between the two tests.
A divide between people who are consequentialists "at core" vs virtue ethicists "at core": do you feel more or less motivated act with virtue, if you guess that you're in a solipsist simulation, and other people don't exist.
If I was the only being in the universe, and this simulation was created for me, I feel more of an impulse to behave with virtue than if there are billions of other beings to impact, but my actions have an insignificant impact on the whole.
In the first case, I feel strongly motivated to "represent myself well" (to the simulators??).
My first, perhaps unflattering, thought is that males, on average, have a stronger internal sense of personal gender identity than females, who's sense of gender identity is more fluid and more socially informed.
More transwomen knew recognized that, before it was in the social mileue as an option.
I wonder if the reason why many people learn that it is more authentic and alive to trust their heart, rather than their own reason, is because their mind is pwned by parasitic memes that aren't aligned with their interests.
If you can't trust your own reasoning, because it's been coopted by a bunch of ideologies that are out to get you to various extents, and you're not smart enough (relative to those memes) to reason your way out of those errors, it probably DOES...
...work better to do "what feels right", even though the heart center has a lot less expressive capacity than the mind (the most complicated it is able to represent is much simpler).
#EconQuestion Why does anyone think that increasing aggregate demand stimulates the economy, on net?
True, if more people are spending, that's more revenue for businesses, and more dollars flowing through the economy.
But spending trades of directly with saving, which (if people are investing, or at least keeping their money in banks) flows through the economy as investment.
And a society saving more and spending less will have cheaper credit.
Overall, it seems better for the long run health and growth of a society for more resources to flow to investment than to consumption. Investment (generally) builds on itself more than consumption does.