But all figures were gone. No supplementary fiures exist in either "articles". the article itself is inconsistent with itself as the 293T transduction part. they report little difference on one, but 8X difference on another.
Tampering of ACE2 by the WIV to fit RBD: archive.is/Y56kI
And why any datasets published after 01/06/2020 is unreliable (already past Shi's "evolutionary arms race" preprint displaying "RaACE2" alignment) archive.is/FoGMH
Key is that no such sequences exist prior to that date. including all eralier datasets that contained R.Affinis Mitochondrion and was RNA-seq. archive.is/WgQmZ
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@interne41914499@robertson_lab@john_jxw@blJOg@SpyrosLytras The sequence of EPI_ISL_610156 contained non-viral sequences in all forward primer and RdRp_r sequences. This indicate origin in DNA. it is a reused GX DNA dataset. take viral amplicon and pour into RNA-seq. as easy as that.
Notice that how the bat Pipistrellus Abramus was not found in ths dataset SRR7896912, which sequences of the virus was found. This bat sequence is found in trace.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Traces/sra/?ru…
which is their "official" SRA data. the only itochondrial reads in SRR7896912 was that of the pig,
Sus Scrofa. the Mitochondrial reads of Bats (Pipistrellus Abramus) was not found in SRR7896912. This is a solid proof of the WIV virus rehosting scheme--take virus amplicons from one host (pig), add to another host (bat fecal swab) and "sequence".