Tweet

Daoyu

22 Jan, 4 tweets, 3 min read

sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
Fix the peer review process! this article is Broken--all figures were gone!
To see all the issues with RaTG13 and HEK293T, see drive.google.com/file/d/1rpmEgw…
and
drive.google.com/file/d/1Xrgovg…
PDF identical to
biorxiv.org/content/10.110…

But all figures were gone. No supplementary fiures exist in either "articles". the article itself is inconsistent with itself as the 293T transduction part. they report little difference on one, but 8X difference on another.

Tampering of ACE2 by the WIV to fit RBD:
archive.is/Y56kI
And why any datasets published after 01/06/2020 is unreliable (already past Shi's "evolutionary arms race" preprint displaying "RaACE2" alignment)
archive.is/FoGMH

Key is that no such sequences exist prior to that date. including all eralier datasets that contained R.Affinis Mitochondrion and was RNA-seq.
archive.is/WgQmZ

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

More from @Daoyu15

Daoyu

@Daoyu15

23 Jan

@interne41914499

@interne41914499 @robertson_lab @john_jxw @blJOg @SpyrosLytras zenodo.org/record/4450267…

@interne41914499

@interne41914499 @robertson_lab @john_jxw @blJOg @SpyrosLytras No such virus exist in current sequencing datasets of MP20 or MJ74. they would have to fake the "new dataset".

@interne41914499

@interne41914499 @robertson_lab @john_jxw @blJOg @SpyrosLytras The sequence of EPI_ISL_610156 contained non-viral sequences in all forward primer and RdRp_r sequences. This indicate origin in DNA. it is a reused GX DNA dataset. take viral amplicon and pour into RNA-seq. as easy as that.

Read 28 tweets

Daoyu

@Daoyu15

22 Jan

IMPORTANT: The HU5-related Merbecovirus isolate BY140568 of the WIV, MN611520.1 ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/mn6115…
Did not originate in bats. The sequence can be found in
trace.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Traces/sra/?ru…
which is a cotton dataset.

Notice that how the bat Pipistrellus Abramus was not found in ths dataset SRR7896912, which sequences of the virus was found. This bat sequence is found in trace.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Traces/sra/?ru…
which is their "official" SRA data. the only itochondrial reads in SRR7896912 was that of the pig,

Sus Scrofa. the Mitochondrial reads of Bats (Pipistrellus Abramus) was not found in SRR7896912. This is a solid proof of the WIV virus rehosting scheme--take virus amplicons from one host (pig), add to another host (bat fecal swab) and "sequence".

Read 7 tweets