One reason many younger women don't understand gender critical feminism is that women often only come up against the biological basis of our oppression when we have children. Before that point - if you're middle class - it's easy to believe that battle is won.
Not the only reason - of course not. But I think it explains why *so many* younger feminists buy into the idea that women’s oppression springs from their gender/socialised role- rather than from the simple fact that they belong to the sex class that has vagina/can give birth.
Of course it's not necessary to be a mother to come to this realisation. But motherhood IS a significant turning point for many women - the point at which they first experience the *structural* nature of the oppression of their biological sex.
And yes, many young women come to this understanding much sooner - by becoming aware, or victims, of rape, prostitution, pornography.
Worth noting - I don't assert that younger women aren't aware of misogyny or don't consider themselves feminists, but that they do not yet see that all of it - ALL of it - originates in their biology. Or that this is why sex (a fact), not gender (a feeling), matters.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It was revelatory, while working at Mumsnet, to witness first hand, in parliament, the extent to which so many politicians wrap a mediocre intellect inside an absolute, bouncing, head-girl or boy self-confidence. You think you know this already - but you don't… [thread 🧵]
Or at least, not the full extent of it. You would be astonished at the paucity of ability, experience and insight in many of those who have a meaningful hand in making our laws, and at the casual, will-they-won’t-they process by which they may - or may not ! - engage with
2/-
critical evidence. Most of all, you would be *astounded* by the extent to which they are unaware of - or worse, aware but unphased by - the disjunct between their own abilities and the grave decisions with which they are charged. 3/-
These Durham girls are 19-20. One of mine is 19. They are *children* in almost every way. What the fuck is wrong with this woman, seriously. Her cool girl shit overrides her desire to protect children like hers?
This is not your posh girl Belle de Jour fantasy @zoesqwilliams . This isn't something on the side for a bouncing jolly-hockeysticks girl with a healthy appetite for sex. This OVERWHELMINGLY impacts working-class/previously abused/addicted/indebted/indentured girls and women 1/
..who have to suck off unwashed men, one after the other, for the survival of themselves/their kids or to service their addiction to unglamorous, shitty street drugs. The kind of women you've made a living off, like a fucking parasite, but have never met. 2/
Some young women seem genuinely unable to understand the argument against 'sex work is work' - they just don't have the same jolt of horror and empathy at the thought of a woman's vagina or anus being rented as a receptacle for his semen by a man. 1/..
Perhaps they don't recognise the scenario as a totalising act of objectification because they no longer recognise objectification at all. Two decades of porn saturation has been so fully internalised that it's engendered a kind of habitual auto-objectification. 2/..
They no longer contemplate the purchase of a woman with an empathy borne of their own experience (to varying degrees) of having been commodified by men, because, at an individual and societal level this system of porn screens out men as the agents of women's dehumanisation. 3/..
It's not by chance that identity ideology constructs middle-aged women as the enemy, is it? It's all *about* mothers - rage at the mother, repudiation of the mother, mother-hate.
Gender theory is a post-truth fantasy of self-generation, of giving birth to one's own Self. Unbodied/post-bodied - technology-born, all evidence of the blood and guts of birth erased;
human physicality/biology edited until it's reduced, essentially, to sex; pure libido, liberated at last from female-enforced limit.