Back in 2018, when I was working as a foreign correspondent in Lisbon, I got a call from my editor back in Madrid asking me to put together a story about one particular example of Portuguese exceptionalism: the abscence of the far-right within its political landscape.
Just a few days prior, VOX, a new ultranationalist party, had won 12 seats in the Andalusian regional elections, marking the first time that a far-right group had made it into a regional parliament in Spain since the country's return to democracy.
Across Europe, center-left parties were on the decline while right-wing populist parties were making major gains.
But then there was trusty Portugal...
Somehow, the country nestled in Europe's southwestern corner seemed to be bucking the trend. Forty years after the triumph of the Carnation Revolution, its people appeared to remain true to the values that had put an end to Salazarism and recovered democratic ideals.
Some said this exceptionalism was due to the country's constitution, which includes an article which prohibits "armed associations, military, militarized or paramilitary-type associations and organizations that are
racist or display a fascist ideology."
Others said that the country's geographic remoteness and relative poverty was responsible: the 2015 migrant crisis hadn't affected Portugal and the refugees relocated there by the EU had left in search of better futures in the north. The far-right had no one to rail against.
And still others said that the secret that explained Portugal's situation was its electorate, in which pensioners and civil servants — cautious folk worried about financial stability and unlikely to be swayed by populist rhetoric — have outsized weight.
Many said that those factors, plus the advantage of having people who remembered the horrors of fascism due to the dictatorship's relatively recent end, were a sort of a vaccine that would prevent Portugal from following the example set by the rest of Europe.
But academics I spoke to said that no country was truly immune from the phenomenon, and stressed that Portugal's exceptionalism could easily conclude if the economic recovery it was then enjoying — largely due to its booming tourism industry — came to an end.
They pointed out that the Portuguese political class hadn't managed to address citizen's most pressing concerns — low wages, lack of industry and problematic long-term prospects for the youth — and said that the situation left an opening for a charismatic rival on the far-right.
And they added that so far the far-right had been kept at bay because its few candidates had been such jokes. At the time its standard bearer was André Ventura, a TV football commentator turned populist demagogue who railed against Portugal's small roma community.
Although Ventura was a clownish figure, the academics warned that he was seizing on racist attitudes that were embedded in parts of Portuguese society and pointed out that there were parts of the country where frog figurines were still displayed in shops to "ward off gypsies."
They also highlighted that, with such a small number of active voters — only five million in the last national elections — a skilled politician would have an easy time of swaying Portugal in one direction or another.
Well, less than a year after my article came out, Portuguese exceptionalism came to an end when, by the narrowest of margins, Ventura won a single seat in Parliament in the October 2019 legislative elections.
You would think that a single seat wasn't that big a deal — and, to be sure, in terms of legislative work, Ventura hasn't done anything with it during the past year — but it did give the far-right politician the air of legitimacy from which to build up his image.
And in a year in which the Portuguese economy went under as COVID shut down tourism, Ventura has used his platform to rail against the system and build up buzz around his candidacy for the Presidency of the Portuguese Republic.
While there was never any possibility that he would defeat the incumbent — former—conservative-turned-independent Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa — there were doubts as to whether Ventura might actually come in at second place, beating out former Socialist MEP Ana Gomes.
In then end, Marcelo has won and Gomes has come second but, head's up, Ventura has ended up in a not-particularly-distant third place, with 496,583 votes, only 44,762 behind the Socialist candidate.
In a country of five million active voters those results are significant.
In keeping with a promise to resign from his party's leadership if he got less votes than Gomes, after the results came out late last night Ventura stepped down from his post as leader of 'Chega' ("Enough" in Portuguese). But does that really mean anything? Probably not.
Ventura remains the face of Portugal's far-right and he can now boast that, in these elections, voters gave him more votes than those garnered by the candidates for the leftist Bloco de Esquerda or the Communist Party, both key allies of Socialist PM Costa's minority government.
He's out to make the most of that popularity, and last night he concluded his speech predicting that he would become a kingmaker in Portugal, with no future government being able to come to power without his party. Hell of a boast, but let's see what happens.
Happy Monday, all.
Addenda to this thread:
As @sofiadmateus points out, Ventura very much used the Bannon / Trump playbook of using insults and talking over people in debates to get ahead. It didn't matter what he said, the key was just to appear to never be retreating.
During this campaign he also appeared to benefit from an episode mirroring the experience of his far-right model in Brazil, Jair Bolsonaro, whose numbers soared after he was mysteriously stabbed during the 2018 presidential elections.
While making an appearance in Setúbal protestors pelted Ventura with objects. The far-right candidate suggested that he had been stoned and presented himself as a martyr to his cause... But journalists later established that he had actually been hit by a small box of gum.
In addition to copying the Bannon / Trump playbook in terms of diatribe, Ventura also similarly benefitted by media complicity in his rise. Portuguese TV personalities were totally fine with brining him onto their shows (and whitewashing him) in order to boost their ratings.
They ok with this even as Ventura was openly declaring that:
— Roma people should be put in camps
— Portugal needed a new dictatorship
— If elected, a specific gender-bending celebrity would no longer be welcome in Portugal
— The elections might be rigged
A lot of soul-searching needs to happen in Portugal if the country wants to reverse the far-right's expansion.
Citizens who abstained yesterday, but are outraged this morning, need to make sure to vote next time around.
The media needs to take a hard look at its role.
And if hard-won democracy is to be preserved, conventional political parties need to revise their strategies and respond to the real needs of the Portuguese people. Without that it will always be easy for someone to come in with scapegoats and easy solutions to seduce voters.
🇵🇹
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
For the past 10 years @POLITICOEurope has published an annual ranking of the 28 people it considers will shape the following year in Europe. This summer I was tapped to put together the 2025 edition the P28 list; here's a brief thread on the experience... politico.eu/politico-28-cl…
Predicting who will mold an entire continent's destiny over the course of the next 12 months isn't easy — especially when that continent is the site of an active war and struggling to deal with a series of socioeconomic and political identity crises.
To try to take this mission on alone would have risked a final product based on my inherent biases — which seemed silly, as God knows the world has no urgent need to have another hot-take written by a man of a certain age.
Belgium held nationwide local elections yesterday and while the Socialists held on in Brussels, some big shifts still happened. Quick thread on the major developments and what they mean:
As happened in last June's regional election, the big winner of Sunday's vote was the economic-liberal Reformist Movement (MR) party. During the campaign the MR painted a fairly dire image of the region's communes, arguing that a return to order was imperative.
The group also railed against the Good Move mobility plan — a collection of measures to reduce car traffic in residential areas and build new bike lanes — which it argued had wreaked havoc across the Brussels region and represented a threat to residents' freedom of movement.
On the Puigdemont saga: This may not seem clear to a lot of folks who are unfamiliar with Spanish politics, but the biggest winner in everything that happened in the last 24 hours may be ... Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez.
Quick explanation...
Last year Sánchez was able to form a minority government thanks to the votes of Carles Puigdemont's Junts party. In exchange for their MPs' backing in the Spanish parliament, Sánchez's Socialist Party filed a controversial bill to amnesty all involved in the separatist movement.
In March early elections were called in Catalonia, and Puigdemont announced his intention to stand for the presidency in a bid to recover the post he occupied back in 2017, when his government orchestrated the illegal independence referendum.
Alright, so, it's the morning after: What happened in Catalonia yesterday? The Socialists won big, the separatist movement suffered a big defeat and the right made significant advances. A curious mix of results that all appear linked to Sánchez's handling of the Catalan dilemma.
The big winner is Salvador Illa, the former Health Minister who oversaw Spain's handling of the COVID crisis. A subdued, exceedingly polite politician, Illa's campaign centered on restored the region's public services and the importance of social welfare instead of independence.
Back in November, when Sánchez's controversial decision to grant the Catalan separatists a blanket amnesty was announced, Illa told me that the measure was needed to finally move on from the drama of the 2017 independence referendum and to focus on the region's real problems.
It's a crucial election day in Catalonia: Will voters signal that quality of life issues are more important than self-determination, or will they instead give power back to separatist leader Carles Puigdemont and endorse a renewed push for independence? 🧵 politico.eu/article/catalo…
Around 5.4 million residents of Catalonia are called to participate in today's regional election. The final official polls published ahead of the vote have Socialist candidate Salvador Illa in the lead, followed closely by separatist leader Carles Puigdemont, of the Junts party.
Folks living abroad may have two reactions to the topic at hand.
The first is a reasonable: "Wait, another round of elections in Spain?!"
Yes.
In the span of a year a Catalan elector will have voted in the municipal, national, regional and EU elections.
Given it's an overcast Easter Monday in Brussels and there's absolutely nothing to do, here's a tale of attempted regicide, bloodthirsty retribution and almost psychotic pettiness from Lisbon to brighten a day that's our calendar's equivalent of the doldrums.
Between the world-famous Pastéis de Belém shop and Lisbon's Mosteiro dos Jerónimos there's a dank, smelly alleyway where a single pillar rises, bearing tribute to the vanished Palace of the Dukes of Aveiro and the damned Távora dynasty.
The Távoras were an aristocratic family that had played its cards particularly well as Portugal switched from being ruled by the Spanish kings to the Dukes of Bragança and has subsequently accumulated a wild amount of power in less than two centuries.