Toxic Profile picture
Jan 26, 2021 14 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Step 0: Citadel pays Robinhood for order flow. Citadel gets to see RH's orders a few milliseconds before they're filled. Citadel may choose to front-run some of those trades.

Step 1: RH's customers and WallStreetBets start manipulating $GME. This is happening in the open.
Officially, they're manipulating $GME (and $BB and $KOSS) because these low-value stocks are being very heavily shorted, and if something moves the value of the stock up (like, tens of thousands of retail investors acting in near unison), those short-sellers may be forced to sell
...to cover their borrowed shares. If most shares are held by retail investors who won't sell, the price will skyrocket (supply/demand) until someone does. The bear hedge funds and such will still have to buy to cover, which may cause a bit of a liquidity crisis for the funds.
The concept of "Screw the hedge fund vampires who exist only to destroy companies like Gamestop" is a big part of /r/WallStreetBets's messaging. It's a compelling message, and a decent secondary reason for this.

The primary reason to manipulate markets remains profit, though.
Step 2: HFTs buy shares ahead of Robinhood users.

Remember Citadel, the firm who can front-run robinhood trades, and got to see all of that RH data a little early because they paid for flow? Yeah. When do you think they started buying $GME in front of RH traders on momentum?
Because the volume of shares exchanged suggests that the HFT folks were all over this, all the way to $150. The message on WSB might be "lots of little guys screwing big Wall Street", but the truth is that the HFT robots were screwing everyone, while paying RobinHood a kickback.
Step 3: A hedge fund becomes insolvent. Today it was Melvin Capital Management. It very likely won't be the last.

Melvin immediately sells off a portion of itself, because it needs the influx of cash or it will vanish in a poof of smoke, vaporizing ~$15 Billion in the process.
Step 4: Who's the lead investor, picking up part of a usually successful fund at fire-sale prices?

Right. Citadel, probably with some of the cash they made by repeatedly profiting in the milliseconds before filling the trades that collapsed this fund.

wsj.com/articles/citad…
Step 5: Citadel still has access to RH order flows, is still allowed to front-run them and/or pocket the spread, and can use that and other information to determine the next over-leveraged fund that's going to get squeezed.

They might even be able to accelerate the squeeze.
So, the next time you discount the impact of "4chan with a bloomberg terminal", remember that they are not the only ones who stand to benefit from intentionally screwing exposed short-sellers.

The professionals are all too happy to amplify the efforts of the amateurs for profit.
Because if amateurs manipulate the market, uh, truthfully, then nobody loses their license.

"I (retail investor) bought because I hate Citron & hedge funds, and we're going to screw them for profit. Join us, but do your own due diligence. YOLO!" might just be legal. IANAL.
If a licensed broker/dealer did this, they'd lose their license, and probably go to jail. Martha Stewart did time for less.

But Citadel, by paying for order flow and sitting in the middle, gets to legally ride-along, printing money the whole way.
So, when you ask yourself, "who pays for no-commission trades, and why?" or "what's the harm of RobinHood's business model?", take a look at what happens behind the scenes, in the milliseconds after you press buy, but before you own those shares.

It's vampires all the way down.
buy. buy to cover. My kingdom for an edit button.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Toxic

Toxic Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @toxic

Jun 28, 2022
I want to talk about something that is very close to my heart, that I never talk about, and that you probably haven’t ever considered. Soon, you’re going to hear a lot about the “compromise” of banning abortion after 15 weeks. Please don’t entertain this as a good idea.
To a lot of people, even people who feel that abortion should be available to everyone who doesn’t want to be pregnant, this feels like a reasonable compromise. It isn’t. It’s inhumane.

If you read through this long thread, I’ll give you a very real example why. Buckle up.
There’s probably no real political appetite for a complete federal abortion ban at this time (“at this time” is holding a lot of weight here considering Republican cruelty and the 2024 elections, but please stay with me).
Read 18 tweets
Feb 13, 2022
SFUSD and the current school board is a major part of what made us leave the city that I first moved to and fell in love with in 1994.

The recall process is flawed, and some right-leaning folks helped fund it. There are a lot of non-parents who are voting NO because of that.
But SFUSD parents have no problems overlooking that, because this school board is not just bad for SF's kids, but through their dereliction of duty, they're actively reducing the livability of The City for families (a group which already has a hard time of it.)
Their performance has been abysmal --actively harmful-- and their priorities are out of line with the students and parents that they supposedly serve.

If you can vote in SF, vote to recall all three board members who are on the ballot.
Read 5 tweets
Dec 7, 2021
Reminder: The pre-commercial web and most of web 1.0 were decentralized. Publishers and hobbyists ran their own servers, many quietly stashed under desks. Bits and bytes were not scarce, everyone had a printing press, revenue was not the goal, and information wanted to be free.
It was built by a generation who had spent half a lifetime copying records/radio to tapes, defeating copy protection on software, xeroxing cartoons for zines, and decrypting analog cable TV. The concept of "information wants to be free" came directly from that history and ethos.
It brought us most of the ad-supported tools (like search engines) and free content/news sites on the web. It brought us Napster and Netflix which led to Spotify and, uh, Netflix. It also brought online banking and a million other online conveniences that are everywhere today.
Read 20 tweets
Oct 31, 2021
#outsidelands was interesting this year (I'm skipping today, though I'm bummed about that). On one hand it was a big celebration of TheBeforeTimes. A vaccinated crowd outdoors in a highly-vaccinated city might be the equation that works.
I certainly hope so. For a lot of people (including a lot of the artists who played), this was what they've been waiting almost 2 years for. A chance to play to a real crowd. A chance to be in a real crowd. A chance to shout "I've Got ASS!" with 50,000 @Lizzo fans.
A number of acts mentioned that this was their first gig back (and in a couple cases, their only gig of 2021). The sense of sheer joy in the crowd over the fact that we get to do this again was palpable.

The classic SF weather (SUN! then extra beautiful FOG!!) certainly helped.
Read 6 tweets
Oct 5, 2021
Automating BGP table changes is definitely a great way to more efficiently push errors far and wide.

And when you inevitably discover the errors of your automated ways, you can always rely on the ultimate manual cage door opener: the angle grinder.
It's reasonable to think that robots can run technical things better than the group of grey ponytails who seemingly keep the internet together with a mishmash of handshakes, UTP, zip-ties, shoe-goo, Panama Red, PVC tape, and a bit too much perl.

It's reasonable, but it's wrong.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 28, 2021
Good Morning @TMFOtter and @themotleyfool.

I have to admit, though I wasn't surprised to see this article this morning, some of the words in it are maybe a little too familiar.

fool.com/investing/2021…
(Light background is @TMFOtter's article. Dark background are my tweets from Monday evening)
I am not a journalist, and I'm still not a lawyer, but a long time ago my professors had a very scary word to describe this behavior. It started with a P, and was best avoided by citing sources and giving attribution.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(