Dr. Erik Wade -- CEASEFIRE NOW Profile picture
Jan 28, 2021 31 tweets 9 min read Read on X
Have I got a *wild* medieval story for you.

A woman sleeps with someone in exchange for presents, and her husband gets mad. So she sets out to prove that her husband would ALSO allow a man to have sex with him in exchange for presents. #MedievalTwitter Image
This is a 13th-century German story by a writer named Dietrich of the Glezze/Gletze.

And it is a LOT. It's also a fascinating insight in how complicated medieval ideas of sexuality and gender could be.

[TW: sexism, homophobia, rape culture] Image
So. There's a married couple, both beautiful and virtuous. One day, while her husband is gone, the woman is sitting in her garden. A strange knight passes by, is lovestruck by her beauty, and approaches her. Basically, he confesses his love and begs her for sex.
She refuses. He offers her increasingly lavish presents--a goshawk! two greyhounds! a horse!--pleading with her. She turns them down, until he offers her his belt, which is magic: the wearer will win any fight.

He also throws in all the other presents to sweeten the deal. Image
It's hard to know how to read this scene. Is it meant to be romantic or threatening? The powerful stranger intruding into her garden, demanding sex, feels deeply alarming. She doesn't *seem* frightened of him, just insulted, however. She even tells him to be quiet and go away. Image
When she finally agrees, she sends away her servants, and she and the knight have sex. The sex is apparently so good that the trees rustle, birds start singing about it, and roses bloom from the ground where they are lying down. Image
Then she tells the knight that she got the better of the deal and sends him away forever.

Unfortunately, a servant spotted her and tells her husband, who is furious and leaves her. She sort of shrugs and says she deserves it but he will soon get over it. Image
This is when the story really gets wild.

She waits a few months, then gets all her presents--hawk, greyhounds, horse, belt--and some money, and sets off to win him back. She stays in an inn, where she sends her servants home before she begins Her Plan.
She tells the innkeeper that she's actually a man in disguise, and that he needs to go out and buy her men's clothes, weapons, and armor.

He accepts this and buys her everything. She cuts her hair, dons the clothes (which look GREAT on her), and puts on her magic belt. Image
Image
Then she goes to her husband's court and announces herself as Sir Henry of Swabia.

At this point, the narrator switches pronouns and names, describing Sir Henry consistently as a man. Image
The husband and Sir Henry do everything together. They go hunting, and Sir Henry's greyhounds are so good at it that the husband begs Sir Henry for them. Henry refuses. Henry's hawk is such a good hunter that the husband also begs for that. Henry refuses.
Then they race their horses home, and Sir Henry easily beats the husband. The husband again offers enormous amounts of money for the horse, which Henry refuses.
There's a tournament, where an amazing Briton beats everyone. The husband warns Sir Henry not to fight the Briton. Sir Henry insists on doing so and beats the Briton easily.

The husband BEGS Sir Henry to teach him and to give him his amazing animals. Image
Sir Henry refuses at first, but the husband keeps offering things. Then Sir Henry finally relents and says the husband can have everything if he agrees to Henry's request. The husband says he will do anything.

Sir Henry says "My desire is a small matter: I love men."
The husband says it's sad that such a wonderful knight should love men and not women.

Sir Henry tells him that he must fulfill Henry's wish if he wants all these presents. The husband asks what the wish is.

Sir Henry says he wants to have sex with the husband. Image
The request is *fascinating*. Henry says the husband should "lie down" with him, and that Henry "will do all the wonderful things that [he] can imagine and think of." 👀

But *especially* Henry will do what a man does to his wife (aka, intercourse).
The husband *immediately* agrees and says he will "suffer everything and not refuse anything."

He adds--and I think this is really telling--"I want to and have to accept it all in return for the greyhounds and the bird of prey."

"I want to" 👀
Sir Henry says that they will do it right then and there.

He tells the husband to lie down on his back. The husband does.

Then Sir Henry calls him a loser.
Sir Henry announces that he's the wife and CHEWS the husband out for agreeing to be a "heretic" with another man.

The wife, basically: "Yes, what I did was bad, but this is SO MUCH WORSE, you loser. Also, I held out for a LOT more presents than you." Image
Then she tells her husband that they are going home and that they will agree to forget this, because--as she says--he "bore the greatest guilt."

And then they go home and live happily ever after! Image
There is a LOT that could be said about this story. There's a clear assumption that some men prefer other men. The author seems to think being a bottom is equivalent to being a woman.

Most interesting, I think, is the lack of reaction to cross-dressing.
AFAB people often dress and live as men in medieval texts, and, as with this text, their pronouns are usually respected and they aren't often deadnamed.

But AMAB people are usually *heavily* condemned for wearing "women's" clothes. But the innkeeper doesn't bat an eye at it.
(It's also stated in a fascinating way: "I'm a knight, not a woman.") Image
It all just goes to show the wide variety of medieval responses to gender and sexual minorities. The husband thinks Sir Henry's preferences are a shame but doesn't denounce him. The wife does. The narrator is curiously silent on the morality of the entire matter. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Update: Wow, glad so many people like this!

I will say that most of the story's elements aren't particularly unusual. As I suggested, the innkeeper's lack of a response to an AMAB person wearing "women's" clothes strikes me as the most unusual for a medieval text.
Everything else basically has precedent. AFAB people becoming knights? All over the place, perhaps most famously in the French Roman de Silence.

Authorial respect for pronouns? Widely attested.

Men trading sex with each other for presents? It's at least joked about in sources including Viking texts.

Women going in disguise to humiliate their husbands and gain the marital upperhand? Very very well popular. My favorite example is De Berangier Au Lonc Cul [Berenger of the Long Asshole]: a woman dresses as a knight and challenges her cowardly husband, who --
-- begs the knight for mercy. So the knight says the husband must kiss the knight's bare asshole. The husband agrees, the knight drops trou, and the husband gives the asshole a "hearty" kiss.

(He is also confused by the knight's genitals and thinks it's all one long asshole) Image
The knight states he's "Berenger of the Long Ass" and then leaves. The husband returns home to find his wife in bed with her lover. He gets mad and she says, "Don't make me get my friend Berenger."

And from then on, she does whatever she wants. Image
Anyway, what strikes me as unusual about "The Belt" is that innkeeper's relative acceptance of an AMAB person in "women's" clothing, which has less medieval precedent that I know of, though the case of Eleanor Rykner is close.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Erik Wade -- CEASEFIRE NOW

Dr. Erik Wade -- CEASEFIRE NOW Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @erik_kaars

Jun 30, 2023
Why are we not talking about Sir William Neville & Sir John Clanvowe, the two gay English knights buried together in a tomb with marriage motifs???

Who were friends with Chaucer and possibly the inspiration for his The Knight's Tale?

And also maybe SPIES? #MedievalTwitter
So the above image is the tombstone of Sir William Neville & Sir John Clanvowe, who died in Galata (outside Constantinople) in 1391 within days of each other. Their shields are "impaled"; that is, their coats of arms are merged. This really only happens with married couples.
The article about their tombstone tries SO hard not to say gay.
Read 17 tweets
May 27, 2023
Plz look at these married Roman queer women!

The clasped hands are a traditional sign of a married couple on funerary reliefs like this.

Their names are Fonteia Eleusis and Fonteia Helena. Quick thread about them! Image
Fonteia Eleusis and Fonteia Helena were freedwomen. Their funerary relief dates from the first century BC.
The British Museum is SO confused.

"why are the ladies acting like they're MARRIED?!" Screenshot from British Mus...
Read 9 tweets
Sep 17, 2022
I want to highlight an example of the whitewashing & erasure of the work of scholars of color--particularly Black & Indigenous ones--in the work of white medievalists. I came across it yesterday, & it's such a clear demonstration of how their work gets credited to white people.
This isn't a critique of the article's claim or its contribution to the field of race studies in Old English.

This is about how white medievalists who start publishing on medieval race draw on the work of scholars of color while obscuring them.
So this article came out recently in PMLA, a journal that has notably blocked work on race by premodernists of colors (medium.com/the-sundial-ac…)

That matters, since this article will be highly visible and cited in a way that the work of scholars of color won't. Afrisc Meowle: Exploring Ra...
Read 25 tweets
Sep 6, 2022
🧵: Modern people: Oh man, medieval people must have really believed in dragons and been terrified of them coming to kill them.

Medieval people: Dragons are a major threat to manuscript marginalia. They hate decorations.

(Paris, BnF, Espagnol 286 LXv) ImageImage
Dragon: What the heck is this overly flowery border??? Have none of you heard of minimalism??

(Paris, BnF, Espagnol 227 f.1) Image
"This letter is TOO ornate! GOLD LEAF? REALLY?"

(Paris, BnF, Français 2628 f.22) Image
Read 5 tweets
Sep 5, 2022
🧵: So several scholars of color are pointing out the problems with racists mad about the new LoTR series. I did the same. My tweet got tepid responses, while the scholars of color faced vicious racism immediately *often from the same people*
[CW: racism, misogyny, homophobia, transphobia]

Most the people disagreeing with me didn't make it an issue of my identity & didn't insult me. These are among the meanest ones.

Easily a third of the responses to the scholars of color were hateful. tweet states "pronouns clown of course"tweet states "ugh these LGBTQ wertz mental weirdos and tweet states "how does Jeff Bezos' boot taste"
Dr. Ramírez got six comments on his main tweet and two of those were immediately vicious insults. Dr. Paul Edward Montgomery Ramírez tweets "A fine remiDr. Dr Paul Edward Montgomery Ramírez tweets "A fine r
Read 10 tweets
Aug 21, 2022
🧵The AHA president's "scholarship on race is ahistorical and presentist" blog isn't an outlier view or a brave take in the face of "the woke mob" or the "radical Left". It's been the party line among many senior scholars for decades.

Take medieval studies. (Really. Take it).
Look at basically any "state of the field" forum in medieval studies from the last few decades, especially in Old English studies. A lot of the big names--Allen Frantzen springs to mind--made careers out of slamming new approaches as presentist and ahistorical.
Here's Frantzen in 1990, complaining about "revisionists" (who he calls "Professors of Otherness") rewriting the teaching of history. To l,' llile die lapi·c of ...Many traditional scholars, ...
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(