Greg Sargent Profile picture
Feb 1, 2021 4 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Republicans are now openly boasting of their plot to win the House through extreme gerrymanders. This alone should dissuade Biden and Dems from negotiating down the stimulus to secure bipartisanship. Dems may have only 2 years. Make them count. My latest:
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
Media is getting snowed by the GOP proposal. It's a double-whammy of bad faith. It's meant to create the impression that Rs are willing to do *something* amid two major crises while also creating a bogus way to claim Biden is reneging on "unity" promise:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/… ImageImage
Dems keep saying they learned the lessons of 2009-2010.

Okay, but those lessons are also that:

1) scaling down ambition to chase bipartisanship doesn't stave off midterm losses, and

2) losing the House means a much slower recovery.

So go big now:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/… ImageImage
One more point about this: The fact that it's even an open question whether Dems will use reconciliation even as Republicans race forward with extreme gerrymanders itself demonstrates the deep asymmetries here:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Greg Sargent

Greg Sargent Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GregTSargent

May 16
News --> Clarence Thomas still won't clarify whether he repaid the principal on a $260,000 loan from a rich friend that he used to buy his RV, Sens Wyden and Whitehouse say. If loan was forgiven, they argue, it should have been reported as taxable income:
newrepublic.com/article/181627…
Clarence Thomas' lawyer sent a letter to Sens Wyden and Whitehouse saying the loan agreement between Thomas and Anthony Welters (valued at $80 million) has been "satisfied."

That's not good enough. As Wyden says: "Did he ever repay the principal?"

newrepublic.com/article/181627…

Image
Image
“Your client’s refusal to clarify how the loan was resolved raises serious concerns regarding violations of federal tax laws,” Wyden/Whitehouse write to Thomas' lawyer.

If loan was forgiven, they say, it should have been noted on financial disclosure.

newrepublic.com/article/181627…

Image
Image
Read 4 tweets
May 11
NEWS --> Sen Sheldon Whitehouse tells me Dems are likely to investigate revelations about Trump soliciting $1 billion from Big Oil execs while corruptly vowing to fulfill their biggest policy demands.

This would be via the Budget Committee. 1/

newrepublic.com/article/181493…
“The phrase that instantly came to mind as I was reading the story was ‘quid pro quo,’” Sen Sheldon Whitehouse tells me about WaPo report on Trump's $1 billion Big Oil shakedown.

This would be extension of Budget Committee hearings into oil industry. 2/

newrepublic.com/article/181493…

Image
Image
The key here is Trump apparently made a range of explicit policy promises while soliciting a precise amount in donations.

I interviewed good government types who explained why this is so alarming and merits a Congressional investigation. See below. 3/

newrepublic.com/article/181493…

Image
Image
Read 5 tweets
May 8
In this response to NYT/Joe Kahn fiasco, I try to pinpoint five conventions of political reporting that obscure the Trump threat and work against Kahn's own stated goal of informing voters.

First, the "two different realities on democracy" fallacy:

newrepublic.com/article/181353…

Image
Image
Second, the failure to clearly describe Trump's plan to cancel prosecutions of himself and other elements of his legal strategy as threats to the system itself, that is, as efforts to put himself above the law:

newrepublic.com/article/181353…

Image
Image
As an example of number 2, look how @nytpolitics today describes Trump's plan to end prosecutions of himself. NYT editors: Do you really think casual readers will grasp how abnormal/threatening to the system this is? Tell them what the stakes truly are.

nytimes.com/2024/05/07/us/…
Image
Read 7 tweets
May 4
If Mike Johnson and Rs are going to hold hearings blaming Dems for campus antisemitism, then Dems should use them to highlight:

*GOP's antisemitic Soros smears
*Trump dinner with antisemite Nick Fuentes
*GOP embrace of Great Replacement Theory

New piece:
newrepublic.com/article/181295…
Mike Johnson, James Comer, and Marjorie Taylor Greene have all suggested George Soros and/or globalist elites are behind the protests.

“These are House Republicans who did not condemn Trump for having dinner with a neo-Nazi," @RepDanGoldman tells me.

newrepublic.com/article/181295…

Image
Image
Dems could also use the hearings to voice core principles: It's possible to call out antisemitism while also insisting it's not antisemitic to criticize Israel's war conduct. Or that one can call out violence while also condemning police overreaction.

newrepublic.com/article/181295…


Image
Image
Image
Read 6 tweets
May 1
Fox News propaganda about Trump's trial has taken on some serious North Korea vibes: It absurdly portrays him as exerting total mastery over the proceedings and even depicts his dozing off as an act of heroic defiance.

This is MAGA cult stuff. 1/

Link:
newrepublic.com/article/181138…
Trump has been posting video of Fox personalities gushing about what a huge winner the trial has been for him. But privately, NYT reports, he's raging at his lead lawyer, which suggests he doesn't actually think things are going too well for him. 2/

newrepublic.com/article/181138…

Image
Image
One Fox News personality even tried to push the idea that Trump's trial is good for him because it means he can't do rallies, denying the media an opportunity to "twist Trump's words."

Trump is Owning The Media and the media doesn't even know it! 3/

newrepublic.com/article/181138…

Image
Image
Read 7 tweets
Apr 27
NEWS --> Prominent conservative Michael Luttig excoriates the right wing SCOTUS justices as "radical," predicting that in the 1/6 case, they'll protect Trump entirely.

“I now believe that it is unlikely Trump will ever be tried," Luttig tells me.

Link:
newrepublic.com/article/181059…
Also in our interview: Michael Luttig, who has strong conservative credentials, is harshly critical of the lines of questioning from Samuel Alito and the other right wing justices.

Luttig says a grant of immunity would "license all future presidents to commit crimes against the United States while in office with impunity."

newrepublic.com/article/181059…Image
Image
Michael Luttig predicts that either a delay will enable Trump to cancel Jack Smith's 1/6 prosecution if he wins the election, or that SCOTUS will grant Trump immunity so he never even gets tried.

newrepublic.com/article/181059…


Image
Image
Image
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(