yes: i have something i am very pleased to finally show you. its been incubating for a while, but it is ready. it requires a little explanation so step into my thread. here are some preview images to entice. all these images are available as prints here:
soviet propaganda is notorious in the history of art for a variety of reasons. theres a subset of these images that focus on religion, specifically on being anti-religion. perhaps you have seen some things like this before. for example, this one says, "i see no god"
i was going over these while doing some research and it occurred to me that most of them operate on what i would call a visual rhetorical device. theyre quite well done and straightforward. for this reason, i thought it would be easy to flip their message + make them pro-religion
so thats what i did. i thought i'd start with five images. it took a while to decide which images to use, to make the designs happen, and then i had to do a few test prints to make sure they looked the way i wanted them to, like propaganda posters. im very pleased with the result
this is the first one. this initially kicked off the whole idea, because when i saw this woman, i didnt think of this room she was in as a prison. its more like a safe haven, shielding her from the dark and malevolent forces outside. the original says: a prison for heart and mind
next, this "i see no God" image. obviously i'm familiar with the idea of "i can't see God, therefore he isn't real". i thought this was an ironic angle to take as one of the main attributes of God (to me) is that he sees all things, so, this one basically completed itself.
this is a cool one i found that i instantly knew i would use. the text on the left says "Everybody understands that where work is being done – the priest and the drunk are both doing harm". i liked the frame of the imagery here a lot, so i decided to take it in this direction:
this one is from the cover of an atheist magazine but i knew i had to use this image. this one was interesting because it almost already reads as a pro-religion image, to me. so, i just made the priest explicitly triumphing over this evil force thats aligned itself with darkness:
lol if youre following this thread as im posting i just noticed i posted the last image with the placeholder text at the bottom instead of the actual text, one sec...
finally: i love the symbolism here. its pretty rare i encounter "totally new" combinations of symbols but the priest milking the church like a cow is really great, to me. i think of the cow as a nourishing, life giving creature, so the comparison to the church, its perfect really
thats the story. like i said ive been incubating this one for a while and i ordered a few test prints and tweaked the colors and finish just to make sure it had the exact feel i wanted for the prints so, im really happy with how they turned out, both irl and as images themselves.
little note on ordering them, if you decide to do so, they say how large they are, they're either 12x16 or 12x18 so i usually recommend people also, if they want, just order a frame elsewhere that will fit it, that way it can match your room / house / general vibe.
hope u find this cool. been wanting to show u them. last plug, as i get into more projects like this, this is the kind of thing people see "behind the scenes" on patreon so, if ur on there, u seen these percolating for.. a while now. thanks for partaking of the vibe either way 👀
mfw the russians have found this thread
привет друзья, я тоже снежный христианин
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
i was sitting in an office recently and looked down at a table of magazines. one had a decorated cake on the cover. i asked myself: is it real, or AI? all images will now be run through this hermeneutic. this is, literally, “dehumanizing”: to deprive of positive human qualities.
once again the AI image conversation should be steered away from “is it good or bad?”, “is it cool or lame?” (subjective, no way to prove these) towards: what does it mean? what does it do? but this angle is less explosively polarizing and more difficult to get attention with.
one time i worked at a traveling art exhibition. it was billed as art from egyptian tombs, but it was actually recreations of the art found in egyptian tombs. this was crazy unethical but i got the job via a long convoluted process accidentally, then quit.
zygmunt bauman (modern social theorist) says that the constantly shifting and unclear nature of our time period also applies to interpersonal relationships: no one is quite sure what it means, specifically, to be a parent, a grandparent, a friend, a coworker, and so on.
[…]
this sounds nonsensical at first - we can define all these terms easily: what a friend or grandparent is. but no one is clear on the obligations that these relationships entail, their day to day norms, what is expected, what assumptions are being made on either side: all unclear.
you see this a lot with present discussions about new parents looking to their parents to step into the role of grandparent. what does that look like, specifically? what is to be expected? this is a huge source of frustration and tension for many people, with no clear answer.
photos instead of paintings (all this was later removed):
this is one of my favorite image parings to show people. in person when you swipe back and forth you can sometimes see it rewire something in their brain about america. same room in the white house, before and after:
it looks like the AI conversation is going to cement around “are artists are coping or not” but id like to submit a second option: that its worthy of skepticism that my broke friends are beholden to copyright laws that apparently don’t apply to tech people making a lot of money
the AI question really should be: are we doing wild west on copyright laws or not. if we are, okay - then that should apply to everyone. if we’re not - okay, then that should apply to everyone. everyone is basically arguing that now tech companies get to be the exception to them.
if my friends can get cease and desist letters for making fanart about a movie or franchise when money gets involved but a guy can also make a billion dollars feeding that movie and franchise into his image maker and selling access to it, i dont think its out of line to ask: what
one key aspect of postmodernism is that art styles are self-consciously deployed as pastiche. this means theyre just used as surface, for what they represent: they become interchangeable. these almost meaningless academic concepts will increasingly characterize your everyday life
when an entire artistic milieu is used just for what it represents, not what it actually is (this already happened a long time ago), the blowback is that it becomes impossible to genuinely use and engage with those milieus. you can’t decide to not be self aware of this process.
this is, in my opinion, the actual origin of what is called “stuck culture”. to start a “nu-metal” band would be referencing what “nu-metal” is. you and the audience would both know that you’re aware of this. that awareness is the source of the “block” - everything is self aware.
the 'people not having kids' trend: fascinating. people can do whatever. but as a larger trend, clearly something is up. likewise, when i ask the older generation why they all had kids, they don't know. they "just did"
so i looked up why non-human animals might not breed
[...]
one fascination i have with this topic is that it seems to be instinctual, thus the turn to animals. in my parents friend group, they all had kids around the same time. i (probably too much) grilled them about why they all did this and they all gave some version of "we just did"
that's "just what you did". okay. as though compelled by something beyond them. not religious, running the spectrum of affluence, no clear answer. likewise, despite the internet obsession with this, there's no clear answer. internet? maybe. politics? maybe. nothing great, imo.