🧵 Republican lawmakers in at least five states have introduced legislation that threatens to cut funding to schools that share curriculum about the award-winning 1619 Project.
It previews new battles in states over control of civics education. bit.ly/36Sxg5x
The #1619Project was first published in The New York Times Magazine in August 2019, marking the 400th anniversary of the beginning of American slavery. nytimes.com/interactive/20…
The project includes audio, essays, poems and visual art that reframes the legacy of slavery in contemporary American life, arguing that Black Americans are the foundation of U.S. democracy.
It's creator, @nhannahjones, won the Pulitzer Prize for commentary for the project.
The @pulitzercenter, in partnership with the 1619 Project, has made available related lesson planning and says more than 4,000 educators from all 50 states have reported using its resources. pulitzercenter.org/projects/1619-…
Lawmakers in Arkansas, Iowa, Mississippi, Missouri and South Dakota want to stop lesson plans that focus on the centrality of slavery to American history as presented in the #1619Project. bit.ly/36Sxg5x
Some historians say the bills are part of a larger effort by Republicans to downplay the ugly legacy of slavery and the contributions of Black people, Native Americans, women and others present during the nation's founding. bit.ly/36Sxg5x
Political battles have long been fought, largely in education boards, over how American students learn about everything from the Civil War to ethnic studies and health.
But this proposed legislation signals future debates may increasingly play out in state legislatures.
The legislation out of Arkansas and Mississippi both call the project "a racially divisive and revisionist account of history that threatens the integrity of the Union by denying the true principles on which it was founded." bit.ly/36Sxg5x
The Iowa bill expands its threat to school funding by suggesting any teachings with "any similarly developed curriculum" could face repercussions. bit.ly/36Sxg5x
The Missouri bill prohibits teaching, affirming or promoting claims, views, or opinions presented in the 1619 Project as "an accurate account or representation of the founding and history of the United States of America." bit.ly/36Sxg5x
Some Republican governors have also proposed using state money to shape how history is taught.
In South Dakota, Gov. Kristi Noem last month proposed spending $900,000 for a curriculum that teaches the state's students "why the U.S. is the most special nation in the history of the world." rapidcityjournal.com/news/local/edu…
Former President Trump also tried to push "patriotic" education, creating a "1776 Commission" that released a report on Martin Luther King Jr. Day that was criticized for its inaccuracies and erasure of Black people, Native Americans and women. npr.org/2020/09/17/914…
While some historians have criticized parts of the project, the Times has stood behind it, and other historians have praised the project's approach and rigor and treatment of the role of white supremacy in U.S. history. nytimes.com/2019/12/20/mag…
.@ProfKori notes several of the anti-1619 Project bills include language that seeks to address the project as a "revisionist," racially divisive framing of history.
Race does not intertwine with history only when people of color are involved, she said. bit.ly/36Sxg5x
.@nhannahjones told The 19th that she doesn't believe the lawmakers who have filed these statehouse bills have actually read the project.
She encouraged them and others to read the initiative before deciding how they feel about it. bit.ly/36Sxg5x
Michèle Foster, a professor at the University of Louisville, said much of what she learned about slavery she got from her family, not school.
She sees a connection between the Capitol riots and the bills filed, linking them to fear of a changing country. bit.ly/36Sxg5x
"I think there are historical and societal conditions that give rise to this fear, and one way to deal with fear is to pass legislation that restricts it," Foster said.
Ranked-choice voting is trending after Alaska voters elected Mary Peltola to the state's only U.S. House seat by using a new voting system.
What is ranked-choice voting, and why does it matter? Let's take a look. ⬇️
2/ In ranked-choice voting, a candidate wins outright if they receive over 50 percent of the vote. If no candidate reaches that threshold, the candidate with the fewest votes as a first-choice candidate is eliminated and those voters’ second choices are added into the mix.
3/ The process repeats until a candidate gets a majority of the vote.
Some experts believe ranked-choice voting has lowered barriers for candidates who are women or people of color. By looking at communities using the system, it certainly seems that way. 19thnews.org/2021/06/how-ra…
1/ This week marks one year since Texas became the first state to ban most abortions. The state’s law, known as Senate Bill 8, was without precedent and offered a glimpse into a world without Roe v. Wade. bit.ly/3Tz7Twq
2/ Rather than criminal punishment, SB8 relied on civil litigation — anyone who “aided or abetted” an illegal abortion could be sued for $10,000.
The past year has completely changed the landscape for Texans with unintended pregnancies. bit.ly/3Tz7Twq
3/ @shefalil spoke with three Texas women who sought an abortion in this past year. Each has a different story. But all shared similar sentiments: anger, sorrow, frustration and fear. bit.ly/3Tz7Twq
Multiple Republican midterm candidates have removed from their campaign sites references to particularly strict anti-abortion stances, a shift and an indication of growing concern in the Republican Party over how to handle abortion policy post-Roe v. Wade. bit.ly/3R4GEIx
Arizona U.S. Senate candidate Blake Masters removed language from his website indicating support for a “federal personhood law” that would treat abortion as murder.
Masters’ website now suggests he supports a law banning third-trimester abortions. bit.ly/3R4GEIx
In North Carolina’s 13th Congressional District, since winning the May 17 primary, Republican Bo Hines has removed his “life and family” issues section from his website.
Hines’ website no longer has a reference to abortion. bit.ly/3R4GEIx
On the second day of camp at Tools & Tiaras, 15 girls learning to rivet sheet metal had a special guest. They may not have known him by name, but they definitely knew who he was married to.
"His wife is the first woman vice president in this country." bit.ly/3BOqUnY
.@jenniferagerson joined Second Gentleman @DouglasEmhoff on his visit to the camp designed to encourage girls’ interest in construction-related trades, bolstering his unofficial platform within the administration: gender equity and men supporting women. bit.ly/3BOqUnY
At the camp, Emhoff joined the campers in building their own toolboxes. He wore safety goggles that said "girl power" on their sides and participated in their "secret chant."
And when he finally got his rivet through his sheet metal, he shouted, "We did it, Joe!"
Democratic Sen. Kyrsten Sinema’s opposition to changing Senate filibuster rules has caused her to lose support from the abortion rights group @NARAL and the similarly aligned Emily’s List over her stance against the changes. 🧵bit.ly/33DaRe8
Sinema said, in a statement to The 19th, that the filibuster “has been used repeatedly to protect against wild swings in federal policy, including in the area of protecting women’s health care.”
But, as @emilyslist put it: “Protecting the right to choose is not possible without access to the ballot box.” bit.ly/33DaRe8
Saturday marks the 49th anniversary of Roe v. Wade. It could very well be the last before it is overturned.
With national abortion protections hanging by a thread, stories of a pre-Roe v. Wade nation matter now perhaps more than ever. 🧵 19thne.ws/roe
Before Roe v. Wade, people seeking abortions went to extreme lengths for risky procedures. There was the lingering worry that a procedure might not work. And, if it did, that it could result in medical complications — or even death. 19thne.ws/roe
The 19th spoke with people across the country about life before and after Roe v. Wade.
These are memories from women who received illegal abortions, those who campaigned against abortion rights, and those who worked as health care providers before and after 1973. ⬇️