Ruben Verastigui is (allegedly) a horrifying pedo monster and has been on the digital teams for the @SenateGOP, National @GOP and the Trump campaign. I didn't want to talk about him, but I think it's important.
The allegations against RV are among the most horrifying I have read. It involves possessing and sharing images of rape of infants and plans to take action in the real world of that nature. I don't really recommend reading the details, but they are here. lawandcrime.com/high-profile/f…
These allegations were first brought to light by @jaredlholt who has an excellent thread. He warns people that they may want to avoid the end of the thread because it includes shots of the specific allegations. I make the same warning.
RV was a main stage speaker at the 2013 March For Life.
RV did a headshot for Ronna McDaniel, GOP Chairwoman
RV was working for the Trump campaign and has numerous pictures there
He's a Nikki Haley fan
He's not a fan of VP Harris.
So why is this important? National Security for one.
Anyone that spends time in secret meeting rooms devoted to child porn is going to marked by the Russians. It's what they do. And what choice would this guy have but to cooperate? None. And he was in Congress and the WH.
RV had some other dangerous proclivities from a NATSEC perspective. He was into beastiality and shared nude pictures of himself in the child porn room. As a youth leader in Christian and GOP circles. His risk of being exposed was massive.
A person like this, moving in GOP and Christian circles would certainly find, and find out about, others with similar tendencies. How much damage could he do with that information? We know that Trump would be glad to have that info.
How did a person like this end up taking photos of the National GOP Chair? And on the Trump team? Where were all the Q loons to track this criminal down? I hope the FBI is looking at everything he did for the past four years.
Notable that although the arrest was made by DC Metro, the Department of Homeland Security is also on the case
I have now seen the fuller allegations supporting keeping him in jail pretrial. They are the worst things I have ever read. If true, and he was seriously contemplating what he talked about ... he can never be free again.
No idea if they are meaningfully connected, but she seems horrible in her own way.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dirk Schwenk (Esq) 🎵

Dirk Schwenk (Esq) 🎵 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DirkSchwenk

15 Feb
This is an absolutely stunning video of Marco Rubio before they made him into a #meatpuppet. Talk about mental decline - I didn't even remember Rubio knew how democracy worked. (THANK YOU @doms_mom03 and I hope it's OK I'm boosting your thread)
While we are reliving Cruz's transformation into a pathetic #meatpuppet, here's Cruz talking about Trump's association with David Packer and calling Trump a pathalogical liar. Way to go, Cruz.
Read 5 tweets
13 Feb
Dark Dirk dons a DonJT hat and ponders the next moves. A thread.
I periodically try to peer into the crystal ball and guess what's happening down the pike. When I put on the Trump hat, I'm usually wrong, because I ALWAYS underestimate how low the slithering bottom feeders will go to please dear leader ... but let's look.
So ... first, Trump (and Trumpists) will never concede defeat. ever. The lies are too lucrative and Trump gets off on the pain suffered by his minions and his opponents. forbes.com/sites/jemimamc…
Read 17 tweets
12 Feb
I agree, and I'll explain, since there are so many doubters: 1) The Dem managers are brilliant, and made this choice based on their superior fund of information- this is not incompetence. It is therefore either strategy, or determined by things outside the impeachment @gregolear
My best guess as to those reasons: 1) live witnesses are unpredictable and can say things that hurt a case. Hostile witnesses are hard to control - much easier/better to use their own videotaped in real time words, where you know what they'll say.
2) live witnesses take much more time than video clips, and preparing for a live witness takes much more time than the testimony. Adding 1 and 2 together, I'd guess the managers decided to make sure this case was TIGHT and done on time, so Dems can move on to their agenda.
Read 10 tweets
11 Feb
Let's run back on the questions and see what we've learned so far. I am certain we are still in tip-of-the-iceberg territory. Like, for example, WHY HAVEN'T WE HEARD FROM MIKE PENCE? but I'll leave that for later.
Barr and the federal response: We've learned that the National Guard response was hamstrung by "reforms" put in by Barr who also led the attack on protestors ... so, I don't think Barr is out of the woods.
USCP logistics - these suspicions have been confirmed. Police were ORDERED not to be equipped and not to use deadly force. We still have learned almost nothing about how those orders came to be.
Read 11 tweets
11 Feb
Gosar is at lectern when unknown person runs up to say "protestors have ... ". He looked nervous up to that point. BUT HE DID NOT LOOK SURPRISED ABOUT THE PROTESTORS.
Fugitive Ali Alexander said Gosar helped him organize the stop the steal rally. azcentral.com/story/news/pol…
Now you tell me ... did this filthy traitor know?
Read 4 tweets
10 Feb
I should really go to bed, but let me spend a second on Citizen's United. Your #DemsDoGood house Dems GET IT. Thread #5. Here are the findings. They are profound and good and correct. AND EVERYTHING THAT TRUMPISTS AND REPUBLICANS ARE NOT.
All of this, like the rest of #DemsDoGood #4, is from House Bill 1. The first thing house dems did on Jan 4, 2021. legiscan.com/US/text/HB1/id…
For review, the issue with Citizens United is that SCOTUS said spending money is the same as other protected kinds of speech. So spending money in politics is afforded the greatest protection of the 1A, and is practically untouchable by Congress. That REALLY screwed things up.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!