Peter Boghossian Profile picture
Feb 16, 2021 6 tweets 1 min read Read on X
Here are some problems with factoring historical injustices into decision making processes. Also known as “equity.”
1) Groups will compete for the distinction of having been the most historically oppressed so that they will receive the largest share of resources.
2) Individuals and groups will undervalue the traits necessary for success to the extent that they’ll receive an unequal distribution in their favor. This cycle cannot be broken because merit is inherently disincentivized.
3) The system will incentivize frequent airing of past injustices. This is because doing so will increase the likelihood of receiving a greater share of whatever is being distributed.
4) Proponents of equity-based systems must increase their confidence in the claim that “past oppression was responsible for current disparities” beyond the warrant of the evidence. If they did not, they would not be eligible for as many resources.
We cannot create fair systems by treating people differently on the basis of identity markers or past injustices. We can create fair systems by placing equality front and center. This begins with granting everyone a public education of the first rate and exceptional health care.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Peter Boghossian

Peter Boghossian Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @peterboghossian

Oct 19
Harris, @tegmark and others are incorrect in their assumptions about math. Here’s my heretical take: Math, at its core, is empirical. All numbers derive from counting. It’s observable. 🧵
Consider these two propositions which I’ll reference below:

Math starts with numbers.

Counting is a form of measuring.

We define a measurement, like an inch, and count. 1, 2, 3, etc.
Take the coaster on my table. We agree to call a thing on my table a coaster. There are one and one and one coasters; there are three coasters on the table.
Read 10 tweets
Oct 13
Here’s a quick tip for helping you think through an issue in six easy steps. A thread:

1. State your belief in a single sentence.

2. In a single sentence, state at least one position opposed to your belief.
3. Ask yourself what you would need to know—definitively—for the belief that opposes yours to be true.

4.Ask yourself if every reasonable person would agree to what you stated in #3.

5. Ask yourself how you could go about figuring out #3.
6. If there’s no way for you to figure out #3, perhaps you’re not being reasonable or you may need more information or you may want to reconsider your response. (It could also be that the opposing believe is just patently false or silly.)
Read 5 tweets
Oct 1
Here’s a breakdown of:

“Not all cultures are as valid as each other”.

This thread will explain, in plain language, what disbelieving “not all cultures are equally valid” entails. Image
If you disbelieve the claim that “all cultures are as valid as each other,” then you believe, “All cultures are as valid as each other”. If you believe all cultures are as valid as each other, then you must believe…
…that there is no objective, independent, non-perspectival way to make a judgment about a culture or cultural practice. If you believe this—and you must believe it if you disbelieve that all cultures are as valid as each other—then…
Read 15 tweets
Jan 7
It is important to understand that DEI is not simply an admin arm of higher ed but an ideological apparatus that grew from a body of academic literature. In 2018, @HPluckrose, @ConceptualJames, @MikeNayna, & I exposed the DEI-related fields as totally fraudulent. THREAD
2. We engaged in a one-year immersive exploration of DEI-related fields. We attempted to understand DEI disciplines as “outsiders within” and test their scholarship at its highest levels. (We using fake identities.)
3. Our success metric was three papers in leading DEI-related journals. We thought if we could get three absurd papers published at the highest level it would be the academic scandal of the century & higher ed would be forced to address the problem.
Read 9 tweets
Nov 15, 2022
Currently at the @MrAndyNgo court case in Portland. He’s the plaintiff. I’ll be live tweeting the trial. The defendant waived his right to a jury.
The judge is meticulous in establishing rules of conduct for the media and all those present. I am genuinely impressed with his thoroughness, clarity, and professionalism.

At 37 minutes in he’s still establishing and clarifying rules for the media.
Opening statement by the prosecution is quite strong. Mention of witnesses and video evidence (not yet seen). Robbery in the third degree is the charge.
Read 73 tweets
Sep 14, 2022
Five life lessons I’ve learned from jiu jitsu. 

1) Tap frequently and tap often, but never tap from exhaustion.
2) Relax. The worse the situation the more important it is to relax.
3) To develop excellence, disposition is far more important than physical attributes.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(