Richard Corsi, PhD, PE (Texas) Profile picture
Feb 19, 2021 11 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Portable HEPA Filter Systems.
1/ The cost of retrofitting EVERY public school classroom in the entire US w/ a portable HEPA air filter w/ CADR = 300 cfm is approximately $1 billion w/ recurring cost of about $300M/yr for replacement filters. To be clear, EVERY single classroom.
2/ For a classroom that holds 20-25 students, say 600 to 700 ft2 w/ ceiling height of 9 ft, this portable HEPA unit will yield approx equivalent increase in ventilation (equivalent ACH increase) of 3/hr. For a classroom under-ventilated to 2 ACH the bump up is to 5 ACH!
3/ That leads to a 60% reduction in inhalation dose of aerosol particles. Capacity exists. It can be done now.
4/ The cost to put a very good portable HEPA filtration system in every classroom in US is less than $10/student/year, with recurring filter costs of around $3/student/year. (Thanks to Mark Hernandez of CU Boulder for inspiring that analysis in our webinar today).
5/ That bears repeating. The cost to put a very good portable HEPA filtration system in every classroom in US is less than $10/student/yr, with recurring filter costs of around $3/student/yr. And a substantial reduction in inhaled dose. What's the cost of a textbook? Mic drop.
6/ Add 50% efficient masks on everyone (emitters and receptors) and the overall dose reduction is 90% (10 x reduction in inhalation dose). Just 2 steps in layered risk reduction. We have not even gotten to the hard stuff yet.
7/ If we layer universal mask wearing w/ portable HEPA and “reasonable” increased ventilation for many schools, it is not difficult to exceed 95% inhalation dose reduction (20 x reduction in inhalation dose). And that’s just 3 steps in layered risk reduction.
8/ I am just getting warmed up. But I think that I will stop here and conclude with the following .......
9/ We can do this. It is not rocket science. But schools are getting a lot of contradictory and confused messaging. I have spoken with many school districts. Many of them (not all) are confused beyond belief, and some are falling for unproven or ineffective technologies.
10/ Layered risk reduction. Simple steps. Proven technologies. @j_g_allen and I did the portable HEPA filter analysis in an Op-Ed in the Washington Post in July 2020. The US, Canada, and other nations have lost precious time and great opportunities to do this right. Just Do It!
Approximately $1B is actually on the high side as it assumes a $300 system. I recently purchased a large number of very good HEPA air filters for my college @Portland_State and received a bulk discount w/ actual cost < $200/unit.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Richard Corsi, PhD, PE (Texas)

Richard Corsi, PhD, PE (Texas) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CorsIAQ

Jan 21
The "Sources" chapter of @theNASEM
report on "Health Risks of Indoor Exposure to Fine Particulate Matter & Practical Mitigation Solutions" is approx 60 pages and full of source-specific details. Check out the report here: (some highlights in thread)

nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/27341/…
Sources considered:

(1) Ambient air (wide range of sources): penetration of fine PM from outdoor to indoor air

(2) Combustion processes: natural gas, propane, wood, oil, coal, candles, incense

Tobacco considered only for comparative purposes as much is already known/reported.
(3) Non-combustion heating processes: cooking, essential oil vaporizers, laser printers, e-cigarettes

Cooking is a very large source, whether heating w/ natural gas, propane, electric. Emissions specific to natural gas for cooking & other heating processes considered in (2)
Read 11 tweets
Jan 21
The "Sources" chapter of @theNASEM report on "Health Risks of Indoor Exposure to Fine Particulate Matter & Practical Mitigation Solutions" is approx 60 pages and full of source-specific details. Check out the report here: 👇 (some highlights in thread)

nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/27341/…
Sources considered:

(1) Ambient air (wide range of sources):
penetration of fine PM from outdoor to indoor air

(2) Combustion processes:
natural gas, propane, wood, oil, coal, candles, incense

Tobacco considered only for comparative purposes as much is already known/reported.
(3) Non-combustion heating processes:
cooking, essential oil vaporizers, laser printers, e-cigarettes …

Cooking is a very large source, whether heating w/ natural gas, propane, electric .. Emissions specific to natural gas for cooking & other heating processes considered in (2)
Read 12 tweets
Jan 21
Why is indoor fine particulate matter important?

(Thread)

(1) Americans spend the vast majority of their time indoors. Prior to the pandemic, on average Americans lived to be 79 yo (now lower) & spend almost 70 of those years indoors, 54 years insides residences.
(2) Most fine particulate matter (particles with diameters of 2.5 microns or less) are inhaled indoors. This is true for fine particles of both indoor as well as outdoor origin. (more on sources of fine PM in a future tweet).
(3) There is ample evidence that exposure to fine particulate matter causes a range of adverse health effects (will summarize in a future tweet).
Read 6 tweets
Jan 20
Five overarching conclusions of the new @NASEM report on "Health Risks of Indoor Exposure to Fine Particulate Matter" (thread)

(1) There is ample evidence that exposure to indoor PM2.5 causes adverse health effects
(2) Disparities in population exposure to indoor PM2.5 of both outdoor and indoor origin exist

(3) Technological advancements yield great potential for quantifying & reducing exposures
(4) Effective and practical mitigation of exposure to PM2.5 in homes/schools is currently possible

(5) A lack of centralized responsibility for indoor PM2.5 policy is hindering reductions in population exposure and health benefits at scale
Read 4 tweets
Dec 16, 2023
1/ This CR Box (the one on the right!) has now totaled operational time equivalent to an entire in-classroom school year. Both it and its cohort of three other CR Boxes continue to perform with a high level of effectiveness across a wide range of particle sizes. Image
2/ Four CR Boxes were placed in different indoor settings on the UC Davis campus, from a relatively clean 4-person office suite w/ VCT flooring to a particle-challenged soils lab.
3/ Each CR Box consists of four 20" x 20" x 2" MERV-13 filters (3 boxes w/ filters from the same manufacturer and the 4th from a different manufacturer). A 20" x 20" box fan was used to draw air through each CR Box.
Read 20 tweets
Nov 26, 2023
Nominations for 2023 #CorsiRosenthalBox Awards are now being accepted!

Please retweet to spread the word!!!!

Reply to this tweet with nominations (self nominations highly encouraged!). Just do it!

Rules and #CRBoxAward categories are provided in this long thread. 1/
Nominations will be accepted until December 20th 2023. Awards will be announced early January 2024.

Some 2022 #CorsiRosenthalBox award winners showcased here: 2/corsirosenthalfoundation.org/showcase/
Judges will select from nominees (highest priority) as well as those not nominated but that we know made big splashes in 2023 & may have missed the deadline ....

And now the categories ......... 3/
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(