Steve Cicala Profile picture
Feb 19, 2021 9 tweets 3 min read Read on X
ERCOT stands out a bit.
This is comparing realized hourly load against predicted load based on the weather, time of day, day of week, etc. etc. ERCOT reports this for 8 different weather zones, and many markets break their total system load into separate areas, so about 100 are plotted here.
A couple of standouts: *YIKES* Permian basin!

You can see that wells (that use electricity for their pumps) in the Permian shut in when prices spiked over the weekend. Image
Meanwhile, across the border in El Paso Electric territory: Image
The Texas coast really got hit: Image
Sunflower Electric in Kansas also came up short on the 17th, but duration matters a lot here. (It's also a small area). Image
Note that predictions here are all out of sample--actually based on data from 2017-2019. It is then normalized to be mean zero for January 2021.
The Permian was still largely offline on Friday, even as prices returned to normal. Image
Perhaps more worrying is that the coast is still way below normal while temps are still around freezing. The load profile looks more normal, so I would guess this is reduced usage, not grid interruption. That could indicate damaged homes still dark, or fear of bill shock. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Steve Cicala

Steve Cicala Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SteveCicala

Jul 19, 2022
To complement @ben_moll's excellent thread on EU firms and households substituting away from gas, here are some examples of governments actively discouraging adaptation to scarcity.

They're using taxpayer funds to make the problem worse.

Germany in March: 30 cents off gasoline & 15 cents off diesel.
bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
Germany in July: 5B EUR to subsidize the gas consumption of the exact businesses whose substitution away from gas is key to keeping warm this winter.

*The ministry claims it doesn't have this impact, but if subsidies are tied to losses....

euractiv.com/section/energy…
Read 13 tweets
Feb 25, 2022
This is not even close to a proportional response, and pretending it is invites further aggression.

The EU has made itself exceptionally vulnerable to Russian gas supplies, and this goes a long way towards explaining why they are behaving so pathetically

A quick energy thread:
This article does an excellent job summarizing the problem: It's not simply that the EU relies too heavily on Russian gas.

They have allowed Gazprom to control storage on EU territory.

washingtonpost.com/business/energ…
Early last year Gazprom drew down its storage to unprecedented levels, and failed to refill them for the coming winter.

It's as if they had plans for the coming year... Image
Read 10 tweets
Jan 28, 2022
🚨 In today's American Economic Review: 🚨

Imperfect Markets versus Imperfect Regulation in U.S. Electricity Generation
When I first started learning about electricity markets, I was surprised to learn that we used such dramatically different processes to keep the lights on in the US:

In some places, utility engineers do it as they always have, in others they run auctions.
I was also surprised to learn that we didn't actually know whether the market-based system raised or reduced costs.

On one hand, firms exert market power by "calling in sick" with their low-cost units, requiring expensive units to make up the difference.
Read 15 tweets
Dec 30, 2021
There's an important paper on automation and inequality out today in AEJ:Macro.

It's elegant, it has kickstarted research on automation, and yet it's also under-appreciated.

So here's an appreciation thread: Image
Before Hemous & Olsen, we thought about skill-biased technological change (SBTC) as something that enhanced the productivity (and increased the wages) of high-skill workers.

Productivity growth among a subset of workers raises inequality.
This could explain a rising wage premium for high-skill workers, but there was a huge hole:

How to explain falling low-skill wage levels?
Read 12 tweets
Mar 31, 2021
🚨 Some new results from my work on deregulation out today in the AER: 🚨

Ungated version here: stevecicala.com/papers/fuel_di…
In my 2015 AER, I examined *when* regulation distorts costs by looking at the prices power plants paid for fuel.
I found it depends on cost-reducing opportunities and focused on the difference between natural gas and coal: Gas is homogeneous and traded on open markets, while coal varies along dimensions of heat, ash, sulfur, etc. and tends to be sold in bilateral contracts.
Read 18 tweets
Feb 26, 2021
I'm glad to see a discussion of the culture in economics seminars. A little history (and possibly folklore) on how we got here: Why "We don't clap."
The possible folklore part is that the modern economics seminar format has its roots at @UChi_Economics. At least that's what people there say. They weren't seminars, they were workshops.

The difference is that in a workshop all participants were expected to have read the paper.
It wasn't a presentation, it was a discussion of a paper that everyone had read. Imagine everyone participating in a 90 min discussion, giving the author feedback on their paper and then clapping at the end. Clapping for whom?
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(