WAIT WAIT WAIT

The "who knew rejecting intellectual property was a core anarchist plank???" lib is also pro *gun control* and *mandatory public education*?

HOLY SHIT BURN THEM TO THE GROUND
this is literally everything that goes wrong when you try to tell democrats that they're "already anarchists because anarchy just means respecting people" or some shit

every single one of these people will be outraged we expect them to just serve sentences rather than snitch
I *cannot wait* for all the libs/marxists who just showed up to be all "expecting me to serve solitary confinement for a year rather than answer grand jury questions about other protesters is white supremacist / patriarchal / ableist /etc... why are anarchists jumping me??"
if people are whining about "emotional burdens" from folks telling them to shut up with horrid takes on how torrenting is basically rape you can tell they have absolutely zero spine or willingness to personally sacrifice.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with William Gillis 🏴

William Gillis 🏴 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @rechelon

21 Feb
Let me just say that one of the critiques more humanities inclined folks often trot out of rationalist circles is that they're all arrogant engineers.

Actually their stronger problem -- as someone who's socialized at many events with them -- is *humility*.

Let me explain:
One of the most immediate things you notice at a rationalist social event is how many of them are, for lack of a better description, witless rubes who look up fawningly to anyone they think sounds intelligent and original (in a direction that doesn't challenge them).
Like you'll overhear someone confidently proclaim the most absurd or plainly wrong shit with no real justification besides essentially just trotting out some "I've five math phds" level handwavey qualifications. And a crowd will nod along, looking at them with sparkling eyes.
Read 6 tweets
21 Feb
To hybridize two dramas in my circles:

The best story the closet racist ever told was about a lawyer who is crippled by a fear she left her hairdryer on, constantly returning home/being late to work. Solution: just bring the damn hairdryer with you. Anyway, it's my story now.
The piece this story originates in is a defense of trans folks. It operates in an aside that's basically "sometimes you shouldn't care so much about 'solving' some underlying condition when you can just treat the symptom and save a life." That framing is dismissive, but...
A number of trans friends have positively cited that article as a powerful tool to win respect or even that helped free them to finally transition. The point of the story however is far more general about practicality and I've applied it in many situations.
Read 4 tweets
21 Feb
As with ICE and Homeland Security, there's an astonishing lack of understanding of how RECENT a construction intellectual property mostly is. Copyright laws lagged into creation after the modern surge of creation. Patents, well... Image
Image
When we say that the framework of intellectual property has literally killed hundreds of millions the examples of pharmaceutical patents is the most go-to example, but there are actually many more IP dynamics with arguably comparable death tolls.
Read 10 tweets
20 Feb
I have basically zero patience when it comes to being expected to explain why racism and intellectual property are fucking evil.

I'll just yell at you and block you on both issues. These are such baselines in anarchism they're not up for debate. But read: dklevine.com/general/intell…
The ONLY justification ever for possession/property is scarcity. Information is not scarce and making it scarce has horrific externalities and philosophical implications. Labor is not an objective good of objective value. Making mud pies doesn't entitle you to compensation.
IP creates massive economic inefficiencies and damage literally measured in the deaths of hundreds of millions. But moreover IP is the logic of censorship and mind control, declaring you have the right to stop folks from ultimately quite arbitrary communication of experiences.
Read 24 tweets
19 Feb
Core to my analysis of power has been -- since about 1998 -- that power is rooted in a cognitive strategy of disengagement (walls, borders, static systems, tradition, etc), whereas freedom is about engagement (networking, vigilance, reflection, empathy, etc).
I discuss this briefly in my piece Two Definitions Of Power (which got reposted in 2009 during a website change, but was first posted in the early 00s) while addressing and rejecting attempts to use "power" with positive valences or other definitions.

humaniterations.net/2009/11/13/two…
This core analytic dichotomy between engagement and disengagement cuts through all my work. It was initially a troubling tension with my involvement in the counter-globalization movement. Eventually it won out in the consent v agency framework debate and became positive freedom.
Read 12 tweets
17 Feb
"But what do we owe future generations that have done nothing for us?"

Boy, conservatives are just going to increasingly make their moral nihilism more and more absurdly explicit, aren't they?

The freedom of people ten billion years from now is continuous with my freedom.
I keep re-emphasizing that limited time preference is connected to a limited circle of care. To blur our present identity with the agent operating in our body in the future is basically the same as blurring identity with agents operating in different bodies.
Fascism is based in the intensification of limited identity and horizons. It shrinks the circle of care to the nation -- or in the case of some fash, just the "individual."

This is likewise the mistake of liberal statism (which doesn't care to plan coherently for the future).
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!