Journalists keep writing long pieces about whether Trump could be prosecuted for incitement, QUOTING EXPERTS saying that it'd be a conspiracy charge, not incitement, and still only assessing his incitement exposure.
There are three different conspiracy indictments thus far (Oath Keepers, plus 2 Proud Boys) that have, as their object, "to stop, delay, and hinder Congress's certification of the Electoral College vote."
Those conspiracy indictments all have, as an overt act, use social media to get as many bodies to DC on Jan 6 as possible.

Know anyone else who did that, with the specific intent of delaying certification?
Rudy Giuliani left a voice mail message AFTER THE RIOT trying to delay the certification. Trump gave Pence an illegal order to throw out votes.

Any legal exposure for Trump is far more likely to be conspiracy.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with emptywheel

emptywheel Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @emptywheel

22 Feb
I want to talk about this Intercept article making claims about the Jan 6 investigation.…

I believe RIGHT NOW, it significantly overstates what it shows.
Let's start with the source. Aside from experts, the story relies on a single named source--a recently retired senior FBI person. Image
Was this person part of the investigation and quit out of concerns? Or was this person one of the people who advanced his career by firing those who investigated Trump people, which is THE LEAST damning explanation for why the FBI missed this terrorist attack?
Read 16 tweets
22 Feb
The details of this story -- and the understanding of the legal charges against Jan 6 insurrectionists inadequate -- are too vague to sustain outrage about it.
Just as an example, I love Mike German, but without knowing how FBI is using the data or how granular the data is, you actually CAN'T make this claim, bc every non-Congressional employee IN the Capitol were breaking the law. Image
I also think ANY recent senior FBI retiree should be asked if he was one of the people who politicized DOJ and led FBI to not investigate any Trump associates. Some are.

It's hard to find a universe of people who would have knowledge of this investigation but not conflicts.
Read 5 tweets
22 Feb
You can watch Merrick Garland hearing at either of these links:……
Durbin says DOJ under Barr became the Trump Department of Justice, an arm of the White House.
Incidentally, SJC added Padilla and Ossoff, dropped Ernst and Crapo and added Tom Cotton.

And Kamala Harris seems to have a new job somewhere.
Read 104 tweets
20 Feb
Magistrate James O'Hara called accused Proud Boy conspirator William Chrestman's actions "despicable" and "extremely stupid or gullible," but granted his motion for release.…
The govt asked for a stay, but O'Hara imposed deadlines outside the time (basically, Tuesday mid-day) that the govt is likely to appeal to Beryl Howell to override this decision.
Oh, here's the despicable reference.
Read 4 tweets
19 Feb
Here's how the original and the superseding Oath Keepers conspiracy compare.
Incidentally, the nifty thing about adding websites onto the existing conspiracy is it'll make it easy to add in Stewart Rhodes, who recruited bodies for Jan 6 on the web.
This looks like it's the bus from NC.

Known and unknown on this could get very big (another 40 people, maybe).
Read 8 tweets
18 Feb
Zip Tie Guy's mom, Lisa Eisenhart, is appealing her pre-trial detention.

This is a close case, and it'll be interesting to see what DC Circuit thinks of it.
Here's the Royce Lamberth (GOP appointee, former Head judge) opinion she's appealing.…

Here's my thread on the opinion.

Basic argument is:
1) Jury accused Zip Tie Guy of using force to thwart peaceful Xfer of power, threatening Republic
2) He had a taser
3) Mom threatened to fight to death
4) Under abetting charge, she's on the hook for his taser
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!