archive.is/Oh9eD
Debunking virological’s latest fraudulent claim using “new sequences”. RacCSXXX are synthetic DNA that aren’t even viable, RshSTT198/200 used a human sample to replace the RBD/S2 and EPI-ISL-610156 had BACTERIA stuck to the ends.
ift.tt/3uhuzEF
Debunking virological’s latest fraudulent claim using “new sequences”. RacCSXXX are synthetic DNA that aren’t even viable, RshSTT198/200 used a human sample to replace the RBD/S2 and EPI-ISL-610156 had BACTERIA stuck to the ends.
ift.tt/3uhuzEF
Fabricating serology tests are easy—just take existing antisera and spike into sample sera. They intentionally did not perform metagenomic analysis because it will show that their sera have been tampered with. “were all negative”.
Rc-O319 lacked SRA support and is extremely distant, belonging to the European/African Cohort for RBM and S1-S2 that also lacked a FCS.
Remember that these Duke NUS and institute pasteur staff were zealots that were “only aware after November”. This is basically their collusion by Ecohealth alliance to fake sequences and publish them. The RacCSXXX are essentially synthetic sequence with bat backbone and RmYn02 S.
They have such a significant assembly error that all their 5’-UTR were inverted—all at the exact same location. This is from their first oligo acting as a negative strand in stead of the positive strand as the should be.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
