Lambie: "Facebook is paying for someone else's use of the platform, oh dear."

She says the news media bargaining code is a "terrible idea", it is the biggest joke and she can't believe "even the Greens" have fallen for it.
Lambie says this code is a white flag on tackling tax avoidance.

"If you want Google and Facebook to fund public interest journalism then it is simple, it's really easy, it's called tax."
Lambie says the shareholders of News Corp and Nine will be happy about a fattened up dividend.

"How's that fair though.
We want more money for journalism - let's tax companies making heaps of money and put that money into supporting journalism, put it directly into journalism."
Interestingly both Lambie and Malcolm Roberts have raised the issue that AAP being excluded from making money from the code might be to drive AAP out to give News Corp's competitor a monopoly.
They've finished debate for tonight. It'll be back tomorrow.
I wrote a bit of a summary of the debate last night for the live blog this morning.…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Josh Taylor

Josh Taylor Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @joshgnosis

22 Feb
The news media bargaining code is being debated in the Senate now. Labor indicating they haven't seen any amendments yet that might have been negotiated with Facebook.
Greens senataor Sarah Hanson-Young: We shouldn't be in a situation where two big billionaires. Mark Zuckerberg and Rupert Murdoch get to dictate what news Australians consume when they can consume it.

Calls for their respective companies to pay their fair share of tax in AU
There should be an *and between consume and when. Eyes glossed over when checking Otter transcript.
Read 5 tweets
21 Jan
The news code forcing Google to pay news companies for links would give Google "no real choice but to stop making Google search available in Australia," Australian MD Mel Silva tells Senate committee.
"Withdrawing our services from Australia is the last thing that I want and Google want to have happen, especially when there is another way forward."
Rex Patrick: This whole code is not about, in any way, breaking the internet. It’s about breaking your revenue streams, it’s about breaking your bank account, that’s what this is about... it does not touch the the internet and the way in which it works."
Read 21 tweets
12 Aug 20
Two days of this and no department seems to be able to say who was responsible for hiring security guards for hotel quarantine. They keep circling around the issue.
It seems to come back to a committee meeting made up of officials from several departments.

But it Jobs then had to go procure security once the decision was made.
Pakula says reports certain security firms were chosen for social inclusion goals are incorrect.

"The objective was security. It was not social inclusion."
Read 6 tweets
2 Aug 20
Melbourne moving to curfew between 8pm and 5am for six weeks until September 13. Exercise limited to within 5km of home
Shopping for food and necessary supplies limited to one person per household per day.
Exceptions for curfew is medical care, work, and caregiving. There's no bonk ban, though. You can still visit partner.
Read 8 tweets
18 Jun 20
Morrison says Australian organisations are currently being targeted by a "sophisticated state based cyber actor" across a range of sectors.
It's a bit of an announcement with no detail. I could be cynical and say it seems like it's just a push back against China.
They said they'd publish more detail on cyber dot gov but it's not there yet

This was published yesterday.…
Read 6 tweets
22 May 20
lol, 550 employers (sole traders?) accidentally put down they had 1,500 employees instead of just one.
"perhaps in hindsight the form could have been more straightforward"
"The question was reasonably clear, it's just unfortunate that 1,000 employers misunderstood it."
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!