1/

Another PCP update from Michael O'Bernicia

R [PUB] v Hancock & Others [2021] | Public Notice of Intended Prosecution.

R [PEOPLE'S UNION OF BRITAIN] [PROSECUTION]

V

MATT HANCOCK, SECRETARY OF STATE FOR DHSC [1ST DEFENDANT]
2/

CHRIS WHITTY, CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER [2ND DEFENDANT]

PATRICK VALLANCE, CHIEF SCIENTIFIC OFFICER [3RD DEFENDANT]

NEIL FERGUSON, IMPERIAL COLLEGE [4TH DEFENDANT]­

FAO: MATT HANCOCK, CHRIS WHITTY, PATRICK VALLANCE & NEIL FERGUSON

Served by email at 21:02:21 on 21/02/21.
3/

NOTICE OF INTENDED PRIVATE CRIMINAL PROSECUTION

Dear Sirs,

RE: R [PUB] v HANCOCK & OTHERS [2021]

You are hereby served NOTICE OF INTENDED PRIVATE CRIMINAL PROSECUTION, in relation to the following charges of fraud by false representation and non-disclosure, pertaining...
4/

to the statements you and the other defendants made, regarding the purported 'COVID-19 Pandemic'.

SUMMARY OF CHARGES AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS
FRAUD BY FALSE REPRESENTATION

For all the elements of fraud by false representation to be in place, under section 2 of the...
5/

...Fraud Act 2006, the following must be proven:

a. Party A knowingly relied upon a false statement.

b. Party B was caused by Party A to rely on that false statement.

c. Party A did so with the intent of causing losses to Party B or for the purposes of procuring...
6/

...material gain.

Upon the evidence, the prosecution alleges that the defendants have knowingly relied and caused Parliament and the British People to rely upon multiple false statements during the 'COVID-19 Pandemic', with the intent of securing the maximisation of...
7/

...UK 'vaccination' uptake, as well as past and future material gains.

a (i) You knowingly and falsely claimed that COVID-19 [SARS-CoV-2] is “the most serious public health threat since the 1918 H1N1 influenza pandemic”.

(ii) Upon the evidence, the prosecution alleges...
8/

...that statement is plainly false because expert witness testimony and FOI requests show that neither SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19 have ever been empirically proven to exist and therefore cannot be the cause of a genuine pandemic.

b (i) You knowingly and falsely claimed...
9/

...that “without the social distancing of the entire population, home isolation of cases and household quarantine of their family members”, 510,000 British people would die from COVID-19.

(ii) Upon the evidence, the prosecution alleges that it is an indisputable...
10/

...matter of fact that this prediction has been mathematically proven to be false by the expert witness testimony adduced in this case.

c (i) You knowingly and falsely claimed that the UK Government's COVID-19 policies “...will need to be maintained until a vaccine...
11/

...becomes available”.

(ii) Upon the evidence, the prosecution alleges that this statement is demonstrably false, on the ground that an obviously viable alternative was treating the unproven Coronavirus in accordance with pre-existing public policy, without adopting...
12/

...any of the lockdown policies imposed, thereby avoiding the unconscionable suspension of civil liberties and devastating financial losses the taxpayer.

All of these false statements are contained in the summary of the Imperial College Model, written and published by...
13/

...the 4th defendant on 16/03/2020, on the Imperial College website.

However, additional evidence shows that the defendants began relying upon the erroneous computer-generated data on or before 01/03/2020 when the COVID-19 Battle Plan was announced by the 1st defendant...
14/00

...and quickly implemented by the UK Government, without public scrutiny or meaningful parliamentary debate.

It is alleged that, in causing both Parliament and the British People to rely upon these plainly false statements, the defendants acted dishonestly, knowingly...
15/00

...conspiring to maximise 'vaccination' uptake in the UK, whatever the cost, in order to secure past and future material gains.

Thereby causing public sector borrowings, charged to the UK taxpayer, to rise to 100.8% of UK GDP [as of 20/11/2020]; and the house arrest...
16/00

...of the entire population, which was all done by government diktats, each of which was founded on the plainly dishonest statements contained in the 4th defendant's fraudulent Imperial College Model, which was funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [which, for...
17/00

...the sake of brevity, we will refer to as the Gates Foundation].

Since there are public records which reveal the material gains secured by the defendants' mutual commitments and contributions to the maximisation of 'vaccination' in the UK [and the rest of the world],...
18/00

...the prima facie and circumstantial evidence in support of these serious allegations amply demonstrates that all the elements of section 2 fraud by false representation are in place and that the defendants should be indicted as charged.
19/00

FRAUD BY NON-DISCLOSURE

For all the elements of fraud by non-disclosure to be in place, under section 3 of the Fraud Act 2006, the following must be proven:

a. Party A failed to disclose certain information to Party B.
20/00

b. Party A was under a legal duty to disclose that information to Party B.

c. Party A did so dishonestly, intending, by that failure, to make a gain or cause a loss.

Upon the evidence, the prosecution alleges that the defendants knowingly failed to disclose...
21/00

...information you had legal obligations to disclose to both Parliament and the British People, with the intent of maximising 'vaccination' uptake in the UK, in order to secure past and future material gains, at the devastating cost of civil liberties and the solvency...
22/00

... of the nation.

a. You knowingly failed to disclose that the so-called science and data relied upon by the World Health Organisation [WHO], in declaring SARS-CoV-2 to be a worldwide 'pandemic' on 11/03/2020, was none other than the discredited Imperial College Model.
23/00

b. You knowingly failed to disclose that SARS-CoV-2 was no longer classified as a High Consequence Infectious Disease on 13/03/2020 - before the 1st defendant presented and commended the Coronavirus Bill 2020 to the House of Commons, on the 19th and 23rd of March 2020,...
24/00

...respectively.

c. You knowingly failed to disclose that the supposed latest science and data you relied upon to justify a declaration of a Public Health Emergency was Neil Ferguson's unscientific Imperial College Model; and that it was known by 24/03/2020 at the...
25/00

...latest that said model had been wholly discredited, when the New Scientist published the 4th defendant's admission, before the Parliamentary Committee on Science and Technology, that he had reduced his prediction of 510,000 UK COVID deaths to 20,000, in the event his...
26/

...proposed lockdown policies were not imposed in the UK.

d. You knowingly failed to disclose that the executive agency the 1st defendant controls, Public Health England [PHE], received $500,000 from the US Government to “fast-track the COVID vaccine”, on or around...
27/

...19/03/2020.

e. You knowingly failed to disclose that multiple WHO approved flu 'vaccines' are known to cause fatal adverse events in 377 out of every 100,000 healthy adults injected, whilst 'influenza' normally kills around 388 per year. [The ingredients in every UK...
28/

...licensed COVID 'vaccine' are believed to be very similar to these 2019-21 mRNA spiked flu 'vaccines', in which case they will have comparable mortality rates.]

f. You knowingly failed to disclose that none of the 2019-21 flu and COVID jabs are actually vaccines...
29/

...[they are mRNA treatments or gene therapies], which lays open the floodgates to future civil proceedings for misrepresentation, fraud and damages [irrespective of the purported indemnity granted to 'vaccine' companies and those who administer their products in the...
30/

...Coronavirus Act 2020].

g. You knowingly failed to disclose that there is a direct mathematical correlation between the 2020-21 flu and COVID 'vaccine' roll-outs in the UK and the deaths which the defendants claim to be COVID deaths during the same period.
31/

h. You knowingly and dishonestly failed to disclose this information, when you had legal obligation to disclose it to Parliament and the British public, and you did so in service of the maximisation of 'vaccination' uptake in the UK and the rest of the world, for the...
32/

...purposes of securing their own material gains and those of their accomplices, knowing that the cost to the British People and the economy would be catastrophic.

i. You had a legal obligation to disclose these facts to the British People, on the ground that the...
33/

...1st defendant, upon the advice of the 2nd, 3rd and 4th defendants, pledged on 01/03/2020, in the UK Government's COVID-19 Battle Plan, that: “Public safety is our top priority.”

The prosecution alleges that, had public safety been the defendants' top priority, all of...
34/

...the foregoing information would have been disclosed to both Parliament and the British People, as soon as the information became available.

Moreover, in the mind of any reasonable person, knowing this information is essential to understanding that the entirety of the...
35/

...justifications given for declaring a Public Health Emergency were and remain founded on a series of profoundly dishonest statements, which have been relied upon by the defendants.

It naturally follows that the public disclosure of the information described, by either...
36/

...the 1st, 2nd or 3rd defendant at the UK Government's daily press briefing, on or before 24/03/2020, would have been tantamount to a confession that there was no justifiable cause to declare a Public Health Emergency.

Furthermore, the public disclosure of 8 e could...
37/

...and should have resulted in the suspension of the National Influenza Immunisation Programme and a thorough investigation of the allegedly lethal WHO approved mRNA spiked flu 'vaccines', which are considered all too similar to the substance of the COVID jabs...
38/

...subsequently licensed by the UK Government for mass administration.

However, it naturally follows that, without a 'Public Health Emergency', it would not have been possible for the defendants to cause the lockdown of the nation “until a vaccine is found”, with the...
39/

...fatally flawed advice you gave in your official capacities as Secretary of State for Health & Social Care, Chief Medical Officer, Chief Scientific Officer and the WHO and UK Government's Senior Scientific Advisor on Pandemic Preparedness, Policy and Response.
40/

The data-based evidence adduced by the prosecution also shows that, on the balance of probabilities, the vast majority of the deaths recorded as COVID deaths since September 2020, were, in reality, fatal adverse events, caused by the 2020-21 WHO and UK Government...
41/

...approved flu and COVID shots, in addition to those who died at home, in care homes and hospitals, who were denied palliative care “to save the NHS” from and “flatten the curve” of a 'virus' which has never been proven to exist.

Upon the evidence, the defendants...
42/

...committed section 3 fraud by non-disclosure, under the provisions of the Fraud Act 2006, on the basis that you knowingly and dishonestly failed to disclose information you had legal obligations to disclose to both Parliament and the British People, which you could and...
43/

...should have done in the House of Commons, as well as during the UK Government's media briefings, at various times from 01/03/2020 to the present day, when you had ample opportunities to make public safety their top priority by fully availing Parliament and the British...
44/

...People of the latest science and data, as you repeatedly pledged to do, without ever actually delivering it.

Since there are public records which reveal the material gains secured by the defendants' mutual commitments and contributions to the maximisation of...
45/

...'vaccination' in the UK [and the rest of the world], the prima facie and circumstantial evidence relied upon in support of these criminal allegations amply demonstrates that all the elements of section 3 fraud by non-disclosure are in place and that the defendants...
46/

...should be indicted as charged.

URGENT APPLICATIONS BEFORE THE COURT

Given the unbridled seriousness of the allegations made, the prosecution is applying for summonses to be issued against the defendants without delay, to have you appear before a senior judge to...
47/

...plead and for the case is listed to be heard by a jury at the earliest opportunity.

A second application seeks a declaration, under the inherent jurisdiction of the court to act in the name of justice, that:

a. Upon the prima facie evidence adduced and in accordance...
48/

...with the opinion of Lord Sumption that the Coronavirus Act 2020 is constitutionally unlawful and therefore void and unenforceable, it is declared that, in the interests of providing finality to the families of those who are recorded as having died from or with...
49/

...COVID-19 and for the purposes of providing evidence in R [PUB] v Matt Hancock & Others, autopsies must be carried out and death certificates certified as if the 2020 Act had not been enacted.

b. For a period of at least 90 days, all flu and COVID 'vaccinations' are...
50/

...suspended, pending further criminal investigations into the allegation that the treatments concerned kill a minimum of 377 out of every 100,000 healthy adults injected.

For the avoidance of doubt, these proceedings are being brought in the absence of...
51/

...parliamentary, police or parliamentary intervention, without ill will, frivolity, vexation or malice, under the protection of the Treaty of Universal Community Trust.

In sincerity and honour, Trustees of the People's Union of Britain.
52/

All Rights Reserved – Errors & Omissions Excepted

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The Light - Truthpaper

The Light - Truthpaper Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LightTruthpaper

14 Feb
Latest update from @TheBernician

1/19

Hancock, Whitty, Vallance & Ferguson Stand Accused of Pandemic Fraud.

After yet more damning evidence arose last week, further additions had to be made to the court papers, which we are now aiming to lay in the coming week.
2/19

The four defendants will be Matt Hancock, Chris Whitty, Patrick Vallance and Neil Ferguson, each of whom has inextricable and ultimately incriminating connections with Bill Gates and Big Pharma.
3/19

As well as three counts of fraud by false representation and seven counts of fraud by non-disclosure, under sections 2 and 3 of the Fraud Act 2006, we can now also prove that the entire worldwide scamdemic originated on these shores.
Read 19 tweets
4 Feb
1 PCP Set To Proceed Against Architects of COVID-1984 Scamdemic

We are now in the final stages of preparing to lay the papers in the Private Criminal Prosecution [PCP] against the architects of a genocidal pandemic fraud, that has all but destroyed this country...
2 ...and the world we once knew and loved.

However, the prima facie evidence we have amassed is so compelling and substantive, it is simply inconceivable that any British jury would not convict the defendants of the multiple murderous frauds alleged.
3 Without a hint of hyperbole or wishful thinking, the evidence we will soon be filing into the criminal court is so emphatic that it has the potential to expose the complex deceptions perpetrated worldwide, within a single viral social media post.
Read 35 tweets
24 Jan
1/5

Of course, sharing this is pointless, because our overlords decide what you're allowed to see, and what is verboten

Still, it might save one family, so...

They did it! Robert F Kennedy, Jr. and Del BigTree did it!
2/5

They finally proved the long held claim that “vaccines don’t cause autism” is completely false

And they forced the CDC to remove their statement saying it!

DID YOU HEAR THAT?

The CDC can no longer claim that vaccines do not cause autism!

Because they can... and they do
3/5

In 1980 autism was 1 in 10,000

1986: Vax industry loses liability and the massive increase in unsafe childhood immunizations began

1990’s: Autism 1 in 500, and multi-vial concoctions paired with Tylenol and the ever increasing doses, including neurotoxic aluminum continues
Read 5 tweets
11 Jan
1/5

In 10 short months, the Crime Minister has told us we can't see our parents, family and friends, we can't leave the house, we can't go to work, we can't open our businesses, our children can't go to school, our children can't hug their friends...
2/5

...you can't go on holiday, leave your home town, can't go to the gym, your kids can't play football outside, our children are walking disease spreaders and you've been conditioned to behave as if you are sick...
3/5

...and millions of people think this is perfectly acceptable for an illness neither they nor anyone they know has had.

They will look back in years to come and pore over how so many were mind controlled & conditioned by psychological techniques using a total deception as...
Read 5 tweets
21 Dec 20
1/8

“We are not in lockdown because of the virus. We are in lockdown because in the last nine months the people of Britain have not bothered to download the official government reports of covid from 214+ countries round the world from the WHO Covid dashboard.
2/8

Had you done so and compared deaths around the world and perhaps sensibly adjusted for population size you'd have discovered that the official global story is that covid does not attack countries evenly.
3/8

It attacks western power centres hardest of all, 100x harder than the Far East and Africa. It attacks western aligned nations slightly less hard. When the EU HQ Belgium is hit 133x harder than the Far East and Africa, the UK 100x harder, that is not genetics, or vitamin D.
Read 8 tweets
19 Dec 20
1/8

We can't beat the system.

Not by courts, not by politics, not by violence.

They have it all covered.

But we can make an effort to work and spend outside of the system more and more.

It's also more comfortable and a bit safer than going to war.
2/8

It really is up to each of us to put the effort in to change where we get our food and supplies and skilled services from, and what we exchange for them.
3/8

To not choose fiat currency wherever possible but use anything else inc gold, bitcoin, food, or other items you already have for sale.

This will mean their system is dented each time, as we build a million connections of people who know they are bringing down the system.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!