This is How New York Times framed Action T4.
When you cite New York Times to prove something the Nazis did, you are just saying "I have not read your thread on US Media and the Nazis"
When you cite New York Times to prove something the Nazis did, you are just saying "I have not read your thread on US Media and the Nazis"
https://twitter.com/impeccableideal/status/1363934975037501444
Read this thread:
https://twitter.com/historic_ly/status/1256050642608631813?s=20
Can someone look up the House Unamerican Activities Commission from 1935 and tell me how much money did William Randolph Hearst receive from Hitler for public relations?
https://twitter.com/impeccableideal/status/1363936376618639361?s=20
In 1934, according to the Jewish Daily Bulletin, William Randolph Hearst was on a boat with Hitler.
It is neither positive or negative. It says "Hitler orders Military conscription". What you did not do is that you didn't check if they ended up following through with the order or if they abandoned the idea.
You also did not check what military conscription meant.
You also did not check what military conscription meant.
Those are dumb loopholes Ben Shapiro uses to argue his point. Don't do it with me. Be less careless and more thorough. Especially, if you are working for say... the New York Times and/or have a bluecheck.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
