the dreyfusards believed the jesuits were controlling everything, anti-dreyfusards believed it was some combination of masons, jews, department stores
the thing is the Russians were actually kinda behind spreading reactionary ideas to France! read Faith Hillis's incredible essay on this! journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.10…
but it wasnt really the jesuits, it was the assumptionists!
I will say though, to Matt's point, conspiracy theories about the Jesuits were less harmful than antisemitism
so maybe content does matter!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John Ganz

John Ganz Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @lionel_trolling

24 Feb
The evidence in the Dreyfus case revealed to be a forgery; the forger Colonel Henry commits suicide; Maurras turns him into a martyr; anti-Dreyfusards attempt a farcical coup; Socialists enter the government; a heavy hand is brought down on the far right
johnganz.substack.com/p/the-patrioti…
it's interesting to see how badly planned adventures with little chance of success still were labelled attempted coups, but in the Third Republic the plotters did have some real hope of rallying the Army to their side
We are very familiar with the politics of right wing backlash, but reading about the Affair has revealed there was a politics of left wing backlash: the right kept on doing stupid and crazy provocations that lead to increasingly left-leaning governments
Read 5 tweets
22 Feb
I would say the biggest problem I have with academic history writing is not the prose, but the organization: Argument is often favored over narrative for the sake of rigor I guess, the result being that neither are easy to grasp on first reading
There's also so much repetition of the argument that's trying to disguise itself as specification, but it's not: it's restatement
but the repetition doesn't make things clearer: it makes you think that you are missing some development of the themes and then you realize, "oh that's the same point"
Read 4 tweets
21 Feb
okay the curtis thing gets perilously close to just listing everything that happened
it’s also like yeah i know i lived through this not all of this is excavating forgotten arcana, there should be more than one register
“and then a surprising thing happened” well it can’t all be surprising
Read 4 tweets
19 Feb
i mean no one *has to* accept an apology, if there's a public apology anyone in the public has a right to decide they don't accept it, the problem is that the public is so amorphous and open ended there will always be someone who doesn't want to accept it on principle
you can't apologize to the public, and any apology made in public people will think is an apology *to the public* and they have a right to accept it or reject it, even if strictly speaking it might not concern them
so my advice is dont apologize in public or to the public because that doesnt work; yelling at the public to stop acting like the public probably wont work. everyone arrogates the right to be a member of the public at some point or another
Read 7 tweets
18 Feb
I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of Italians suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced
this is a crime
confirmed italian response
Read 4 tweets
18 Feb
fellow small substackers, join my land reform movement to break up the big estates! subscription redistribution now!
the big substacks oppress the smaller ones: they are well known and they are suck up people's budgets for blogs, people may spend 15, even 20 dollars for substacks a month, but they are not going to spend 25, 30, 40!
how can we compete with the titled aristocracy of media, who trade on the privilege of an old name?
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!