Let’s address these points one by one.

Firstly, it’s laughable that you think discussing the history and reality of the sex trade is “horrifying,” not because the sex trade has its roots in women's slavery and patriarchal oppression, but because we’re talking about it. THREAD:
1. The sex trade is presented as an individual decision and defended as such. This necessarily obscures, downplays, or outright denies the social and economic forces which make true consent and autonomy impossible.
2. Decriminalizing pimping and buying does expand the industry. If you advocate these policies you are inadvertently advocating to expand the industry. When the sex trade expands, the right to exit contracts.
3. Carol Leigh IS a neoliberal feminist and an anti-communist. The neoliberal agenda of globalization, privatization, and economic liberalization fit perfectly with institutionalizing the global sex trade, hence why they share the same funders.
4. Leigh identified herself as a “middle-class college girl” who wanted to get into the sex trade because it was “very exciting” and to a “risk taker” like her, dabbling in the sex trade was like “hitchhiking.” Petty bourgeois delusions of grandeur.
5. Leigh, accepting the end of history narrative and capitalist realism, argues that “sex for sale is part of the fabric of society,” which when we consider that exploitation “is part of the fabric of society” really doesn’t say much.
6. You’re conflating ontology, a branch of metaphysics that considers things separate, fixed + frozen, with Marxist dialectics which captures society in motion. Our dialectical analysis of sexual violence studies "it internally and in its relations with other things (Mao)."
7. The contradictions internal to the sex trade cause violence.  The “session” between a prostitute and her buyer is always a power struggle between the buyer and the bought. Any prostitute knows this: clients want us to do more for less money, we want to do less for more money.
8. This isn’t dependent on the disposition of the client: the structural positions of the buyer and the bought necessitate these interests. When this power struggle plays out over and inside our bodies, during sex, violence and a violation of our boundaries is bound to occur.
9. This is validated by the fact that violence and coercion have never been able to be reformed out of the sex trade under any legal framework. Yet, we know decriminalizing pimps and buyers expands the trade and the violence within it. Sex trade reform is sex trade expansion.
10. The conflation between “sex worker” and “sex industry” is an intentional strategy of the pimp lobby to shut down critiques of the industry itself. Are you conflating these terms intentionally or by mistake?
11. Being against work is silly. Being against the exploitation of living labor and the super-exploitation of women’s bodies for private profit is a more principled, socialist position to take. Regardless, the double sexual + economic exploitation of women is untenable.
12. You’re not socialist or anti-colonial if you fight to protect and expand an industry that is not socially necessary, responsible for unimaginable acts of violence against proletarian women, and continues to be used as a tool of imperialism to extract profit from our bodies.✌️
13. Like our comrades from Spain stated: "The regulation of prostitution is the equivalent of the bourgeoisie planting a victory flag in patriarchy and capital’s grounds. It is the last legal frontier to appropriate our bodies."
14. Liberals function to obscure reality and jumble consciousness in order to, in the last instance, defend the current order of things. We have to see and speak with clarity and expose things for what they are; how they exist in reality. This will make many uncomfortable. Good.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Esperanza

Esperanza Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @endclasssociety

23 Feb
Isn't it funny that liberals are pro-Native sovereignty until Indigenous organizers critique the commodification of women's bodies? Then they erupt into a senseless rage? Can you really not envision a world beyond the right to use money to buy and sell access to womens bodies?
Maybe YOU'RE the problem and maybe YOU need to ask why you're enacting colonial domination by demanding people align completely with the hegemonic liberal take on an issue that is actually really complex. Same thing happened at the Zapatista gathering with USians attacking them.
When activists from the center of imperialism can't help but attack Indigenous and third world women for opposing an imperialist industry then maybe those activists are really just freely doing the work of the imperialist settler-state for them. You're a volunteer!
Read 6 tweets
8 Jan
Quick list of things I missed in the original thread that further advance the hypothesis that this is largely petty-bourgeois reaction and not a working-class insurrection:

1. That guy in Pelosi's office? Small business owner who took a PPP loan.

dailydot.com/debug/letter-g…
2. This guy? Aaron Mostofsky who is the child of wealthy parents including a father who is a Brooklyn Supreme Court judge. gothamist.com/news/trump-fur…
3. Here's Adam Johnson, a small business furniture owner and person with a graduate degree in psychology.
Read 7 tweets
8 Jan
1. I'm hearing a lot of people painting Trump supporters who stormed the capitol yesterday as blue-collar and working-class. I'm not sure I believe that. While we don't have demographic information for every participant we do have indicators that can help paint a fuller picture.
2. The woman that got shot? She was a CEO and her husband is the company’s Chief Financial Officer. Definitely not working-class in any use of the term.
latimes.com/california/sto…
3. That guy dressed in a fur coat? Here he is with Rudy Guiliani and Bernard Kerik. Far from blue-collar, he works as a paid actor and is a self-identified "author" and "shamanic practitioner."
Read 12 tweets
6 Jan
1. It should be clear that the reason the left's actions aren't as escalated as the right is that the left is very much confined by the boundaries set by the "controlled opposition" agenda set by the Democratic Party. This doesn't mean the right is somehow "more revolutionary."
2. The far-right, composed of mostly petty-bourgeois whites feeling like their dominance is threatened, only become insurrectionary at the moment that they perceive the state is not protecting and advancing their interests. But these interests aren't that of the proletariat.
3. Like @devinzshaw said: 'Far Right movements are system-loyal when they perceive that the entitlements of white supremacy can be advanced within settler-colonial institutions, and they become insurrectionary when they perceive that these entitlements cannot be thus advanced.'
Read 6 tweets
2 Jan
1. We often call things “liberal” as a pejorative. Sometimes it can get confusing if you don’t understand what liberalism is, what’s wrong with it, and why we should oppose it. So let’s go over the basics!
2. What is liberalism? According to Britannica, it is a “political doctrine that takes protecting and enhancing the freedom of the individual to be the central problem of politics.”
3. Like all ideologies, liberalism emerged out of concrete material conditions and class struggle. Liberalism is the ideology emerging from the victorious bourgeoisie in their victory over feudalism, the establishment of capitalism, and their creation of liberal democracies.
Read 9 tweets
2 Jan
Why are some of you so pathetic? Calling a transgender woman who survived brutal rape as a homeless prostitute a "TERF/SWERF sympathizer" because she is critical of liberal discourse? You make me sick. Liberalism is a disease and you have a terminal case of it.
What makes people so angry at me is that I am not afraid to critique the holy grail of liberal analyses: mainstream sex work and trans discourses. None of this makes me anti-sex-worker or anti-trans. It's actually the opposite, I love my people and I want us to be free.
It's always "listen to X" until person from X group makes a principled argument disagreeing with you. Then you have to resort to vilifying that person in a haphazard attempt to deplatform them because you fear their message might catch on.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!