If I understand you well, there are two questions here. First is the attitude of the law as it relates to parents who refuse blood transfusion for a child
I think there is a Supreme court decision on this. Oh, I think it Esabunor v Faweya where the court held that it is the duty of the court to determine the right and welfare of the child, not the parents since
the child cannot make informed decision on his/her life. In this case the Supreme Court upheld the action of the Chevron clinic doctor
On your second question, it invariably follows that parents would be charged for manslaughter if they refuse infusion for a child and the child dies.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Great Oracle

Great Oracle Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AbdulMahmud01

27 Feb
In the heydays of GEJ, I would rip the heart out of his government on Anakwe's AIT programme and still stopped-by at Oronto's office at the Villa and for a tète-à-tète with Oronto. No malice.
Occasionally catching up on the past and the failings of his boss. We need the criticisms, he would say. Same with Maku as Minister of Information.
Labaran Maku would in fact ask his SA to fetch me from the 10th floor of Radio House and bring me to his office, 4 floors below. "Comrade, you were on fire", he would scream while welcoming to his office.
Read 5 tweets
27 Feb
I belong to two big groups, big in terms of their elites' compositions, National Consultative Front and Restructure Actualization Movement and I left a third due to its theory and sociology of action - won't name it
Two things I find in the three groups are:
1. The willingness of members of southern extraction to engage with the trouble with Nigeria;
2. The utter silence of members of northern extraction
Northern members who occasionally break free from silence merely oppose contributions on the trouble with Nigeria, without advancing their solutions
Read 6 tweets
25 Feb
What do you mean by theocracy? And removing theocracy from the criminal justice system?

If I understand theocracy in its form, I struggle to see how our criminal justice system is divinely administered. Except you are saying our criminal laws have sources in divine texts?
I think we have to understand the sources of our laws for us to appreciate the nature of our legal system. The sources of our laws ( apart from the Constitution) are the received English law ( common law, equittable doctrines and statutes of general application
in force in England on 1 January 1900) and Sharia law.
If Sharia/Islamic law is informed by Islamic texts and teachings, our common law has part sources in the practices of the English Ecclesiastical courts. Either way our criminal justice system has "theocratic" flavours -
Read 6 tweets
24 Feb

Stop whatever you are doing and read the thread of @ChifeDr. It is historical as it is sociological. As I've always contended on the streets, our ethnic relations and relationships are steeped in history. We are divided today because the ruling class wants it so
to maintain its hold on power. Members of our ruling class are like nembers of the corporate board who are only interested in their shares returns - the national cake. The Buhari hegemony doesn't care about the poor Fulanis whose farm lands have been seized by bandits
So also are his acolytes in other regions of the country. In the grander scheme, they meet to share what their Power Shares Index allocates to them. They're not alone. They've clerics who deploy esoteric jargons to remind you of the good life in the hereafter
Read 5 tweets
23 Feb
"Their ammunitions are out this world. I have seen such type of arms in my life"
- Freed Niger kidnap victim narrating his ordeal.

Two things raised to my mind reading the ordeal this morn:

1. Very likely that none of our security forces took the victims in for debriefing
2. That our security forces are increasingly useless.

For number (1) above, if the debriefing ever happened, the victim would not have been allowed to speak to the media. Placing such information in the public place has two implications:
a. Creates mass hysteria
b. Blows off the cover on the ammunition pile of the terrorists, who would now have to increase their ammo power, knowing that their capacity has been exposed.

Whichever, it doesn't look good for the security forces.
Read 10 tweets
22 Feb
Counsel, having established the law on criminal assault ( and battery) in your response to @Mochievous' tweet, I find your conclusion extravagant and not supported by the same law - S.252 of the Criminal Code - which establishes the offence whose ingredients you distilled
Actual harm is not central to the finding of guilt in the case of criminal assault (and battery)- See Omohodion v Commissioner of Police (1961). Apprehension of harm or fear of harm or violence is sufficient. See Commissioner of Policee ( 2016; Unreported)
So reading S.252 of the Criminal Code, there are two ingredients that must be proved by a victim of criminal assault (and battery) thus:
1. That there must be threat to apply force;
2. That the act puts a reasonable person in fear of battery. In other words,
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!