Way, way back in Jan. 2017, DC police conducted mass arrests during protests on Trump's inauguration day. Lawsuits alleged constitutional violations: buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetil…
There's a tentative settlement, but things have gotten a bit messy. Short thread on a hearing today:
A judge had ruled some claims could go forward, and then there was a long stretch of mediation/settlement talks. Everything seemed on track for resolution, but then last month the ACLU alerted the judge that DC seemed to be dragging its feet in signing:
Which brings us to today's hearing. DC's lawyer said they have to submit any monetary settlement for mayoral approval, and didn't know how much longer that would take and couldn't guarantee for sure it'd get final approval. Judge Amy Berman Jackson was not thrilled to hear this.
Jackson agreed to give DC a little more time, but made clear that if the city came back with revisions at this point, it would be "extremely disappointing and inappropriate" given the time and work that's gone into negotiating the deal
The judge told DC's lawyer to convey a "very strong message" to the powers that be that the case needs to end. If DC comes back and asks for any more time, Jackson said she'll hold another hearing and require someone with a "higher level of authority" to come and explain why
Jackson: "I'm expecting this to be gone by then."
/end of thread
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Court action this afternoon/evening: 2-1 order from the DC Circuit denying request by the US Conference of Catholic Bishops to restore appropriated federal funds for refugee resettlement programs that the Trump admin cut off; Judge Millett dissents assets.bwbx.io/documents/user…
In a 2-1 order (another Millett dissent), the DC Circuit said it would let Trump fire two independent agency officials, boosting the admin's push to expand his power to control the makeup of these entities. One fired official is preparing to ask the full circuit to reconsider: bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
Meanwhile, a 4th Circuit panel lifted restrictions on the role that Elon Musk and people affiliated with his DOGE project can play in dismantling USAID (but was divided on the underlying merits of the constitutional fight over the power Musk is exercising) bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
A DC judge said today he’ll likely order the Trump admin's government efficiency office to preserve its records; no immediate ruling on whether DOGE is subject to FOIA buff.ly/mycbsPj
The judge told the DOJ lawyer appearing today in the DOGE FOIA case to "advise your clients" ASAP about the likelihood of a preservation order. Trump admin contends the records law doesn't apply to DOGE bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
The judge told the DOJ lawyer appearing today in the DOGE FOIA case to "advise your clients" ASAP about the likelihood of a preservation order. Trump admin contends the records law doesn't apply to DOGE bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
ICYMI: Trump announced a new policy requiring DOJ to demand in court that challengers suing the admin should have to post money bonds if they win orders blocking his actions. Several judges have already rejected such requests buff.ly/11JLZfZ
DC judge denied motion to restrict DOGE access at Treasury. NY judge's injunction remains in place for now.
DC judge said plaintiffs couldn't show irreparable harm re: personal data becoming public -- but they could come back if the situation changed assets.bwbx.io/documents/user…
Overnight: Washington state AG filed a contempt motion accusing the Trump administration of defying an injunction that blocked cutting off federal funds to institutions that provide gender-affirming care in the states that sued assets.bwbx.io/documents/user…
We've got ourselves an old fashioned Friday news dump. What's happened over the past few hours:
- SCOTUS declined, for now, to let Trump oust the head of a federal whistleblower protection agency, letting the official stay in the job until at least Wednesday. From Greg Stohr: bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
- DOJ took the unusual step of confirming that it had filed a misconduct complaint against a DC fed judge over her handling of recent hearings in litigation over Trump's effort to bar trans troops from serving in the US military. With Erik Larson: bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
A Mass. federal judge set a hearing for tomorrow on whether to immediately halt the Elon Musk-affiliated "Fork in the Road" deferred resignation offer for federal workers from the Trump admin. Prev: bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
Meanwhile, a DC federal judge is holding a hearing now on whether to intervene re: Treasury Dept. giving info to Musk's DOGE team. Prev: bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
Some more court action later in the day:
- Re: Trump's bar on transgender troops, judge isn't ruling on the motion for an immediate TRO after US basically said status quo will remain pending a fight over a longer-term prelim injunction, but judge says govt must immediately alert her + plaintiffs if that'll change
- DC federal judge set a Friday hearing to consider whether to grant a TRO blocking DOGE from getting access to Dept. of Labor systems and information. See earlier from @swillmer: bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
Interesting hearing this evening in Missouri’s lawsuit seeking to block DOJ from sending two election observers to monitor a St. Louis polling site on Election Day. No ruling from the bench (recap below)
Complaint: assets.bwbx.io/documents/user…
DOJ oppo: assets.bwbx.io/documents/user…
Missouri argues state law spells out who can enter a polling place to observe and DOJ monitors aren’t covered. DOJ says there’s a 2021 settlement with the St. Louis board of elections for ADA violations re: disability access that allows this
But Missouri AG says it appeared it was news to state officials that this agreement was in effect, and more broadly, that the board lacked authority to enter into the monitoring term in the first place. Which raises some Qs for the judge...