Zoe Tillman Profile picture
Feb 26, 2021 6 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Way, way back in Jan. 2017, DC police conducted mass arrests during protests on Trump's inauguration day. Lawsuits alleged constitutional violations: 
buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetil…

There's a tentative settlement, but things have gotten a bit messy. Short thread on a hearing today:
A judge had ruled some claims could go forward, and then there was a long stretch of mediation/settlement talks. Everything seemed on track for resolution, but then last month the ACLU alerted the judge that DC seemed to be dragging its feet in signing: 
Which brings us to today's hearing. DC's lawyer said they have to submit any monetary settlement for mayoral approval, and didn't know how much longer that would take and couldn't guarantee for sure it'd get final approval. Judge Amy Berman Jackson was not thrilled to hear this.
Jackson agreed to give DC a little more time, but made clear that if the city came back with revisions at this point, it would be "extremely disappointing and inappropriate" given the time and work that's gone into negotiating the deal
The judge told DC's lawyer to convey a "very strong message" to the powers that be that the case needs to end. If DC comes back and asks for any more time, Jackson said she'll hold another hearing and require someone with a "higher level of authority" to come and explain why
Jackson: "I'm expecting this to be gone by then."

/end of thread

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Zoe Tillman

Zoe Tillman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ZoeTillman

Sep 5
Hello on this stunning September morning from the DC federal courthouse, where Judge Tanya Chutkan is holding the first hearing in the Trump case since SCOTUS kicked it back to her. Trump won't be here. Waiting to see what kind of schedule Chutkan will set for the next round of fights over the future of the indictment
bloomberg.com/news/articles/…Image
Trump's lawyers all just entered the courtroom, and also thrilled to report that courthouse security dog Legend is here and continues to be a Very Good Dog (no pics allowed I'm afraid)
Judge Chutkan is on the bench and we're off
Read 17 tweets
Dec 11, 2023
Hello from the DC federal courthouse, where Rudy Giuliani is waiting to get through security as jury selection is set to begin this a.m. to determine how much in damages he'll owe two Georgia election workers who sued him for defamation. Stay tuned.

Prev: bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
And jury selection is just getting underway in Rudy Giuliani's damages trial -- Judge Beryl Howell, who was not amused that Giuliani was not in the courtroom at 9am when they were supposed to begin, is presiding
After a few hiccups related to the list of prospective jurors, *now* voir dire is officially underway in the defamation damages trial against Rudy Giuliani
Read 20 tweets
Nov 18, 2023
BREAKING: A Colorado judge has ruled that Donald Trump can appear on 2024 ballots - she found that he *did* engage in insurrection by inciting the Jan. 6 attack, *but* that the Constitutional prohibition does not apply to the presidency. More to come.
assets.bwbx.io/documents/user…


Image
Image
Image
NEW: A Colorado judge found Donald Trump engaged in insurrection by inciting the Jan. 6 attack.

But she held the Constitution's insurrectionist ban didn't apply to a president/the presidency, meaning he'll appear on 2024 ballots.

Story, more to come: bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
Lawyers for the Colorado voters who brought the insurrection disqualification case against Trump say they'll appeal to the Colorado Supreme Court. Whoever loses there can petition SCOTUS to intervene
bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
Read 5 tweets
Oct 16, 2023
Today at 10am: Prosecutors will make their case before a DC federal judge for a partial gag order restricting what Donald Trump can say about the election obstruction case against him.

Why DOJ says it's necessary:


Trump's oppo: bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
On how as long as Donald Trump is facing criminal charges and civil claims in court, what he says and does in the outside world can have consequences in a courtroom:
bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
Chutkan begins by swiftly resolving an issue raised by the govt over how to handle a future defense survey of the potential jury pool in DC. Judge is okay with defense agreement to give advance notice, timing, sample size, doesn't see need to micromanage further at this point
Read 40 tweets
Aug 31, 2023
Justice Clarence Thomas's 2022 financial disclosure is in, noting three trips w/ expenses paid for by Harlan Crow:

Thomas notes 2014 sale of properties to Crow (1st reported by ProPublica), saying he "inadvertently" didn't realize that should be reported assets.bwbx.io/documents/user…


Image
Image
Image
Justice Samuel Alito's 2022 disclosure is also out now:

No travel reported paid for by individuals, no note re: ProPublica reporting on earlier luxury trip reimbursed by GOP donor Paul Singer (Alito has publicly defended this/denounced the reporting)assets.bwbx.io/documents/user…
Justice Clarence Thomas:
- reported three 2022 trips w/ expenses paid for by Harlan Crow
- said he "inadvertently" didn't realize he had to report 2014 property sales to Crow
- defended not reporting earlier "personal hospitality," private plane trips
bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
Read 4 tweets
Aug 28, 2023
Hello on this humid late August a.m. from the DC federal courthouse, where Judge Tanya Chutkan will hear arguments and is expected to set a trial date in Trump's 2020 election obstruction case. Special counsel wants to start Jan. 2. Trump wants April 2026:
bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
Image
Judge Chutkan is on the bench and starts by saying that *neither* trial date proposal is "acceptable" -- DOJ wants Jan. 2, Trump wants April 2026.

Says trial sched can't depend on a defendant's personal and professional obligations, so Trump will have to make a date work
Chutkan says she is taking into account Trump's other cases and trial schedules, but explains why other arguments for a 2026 trial date don't fly -- SCOTUS has said time of investigation doesn't mean defense gets same time for prep, comparisons to other J6 cases aren't on point
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(