Further reading from @TommyShakes | Blaming the victim, all over again: Waddell and Aylward's biopsychosocial (BPS) model of disability journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.117…
Problems in the assessment of psychosomatic conditions in Social Security benefits and related commercial schemes | J Psychosom Res 1995 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8568732/
"Some diagnoses are purely subjective by definition..."
Part of the problem is the assumption that such a "medical model" actually exists.
When actually this seems to be a description of one of a number of different scenarios, where the ideal "model" is at the top.
Another big assumption about the "medical model" is that it makes assumptions.
From my own experience, application of BPS in healthcare, rather than addressing complex issues in a multifactorial way, essentially reduces it to "guided self-help", and further exacerbates the problem.
Dog whistle medicine and disability denial - Unum, Aylward and the "Wessely School"
Aylward also contributed a section to the Trends in Health and Disability 2002 report (Unum) - it's quite dry though. The section by a certain Dr Sharpe is more interesting... web.archive.org/web/2003012615…
"Both State and private insurers pay people to remain ill."
Nice dig at patient support groups and charities there too. 😠
No mate, biggest obstacle to recovery is lack of effective treatments.
Sharpe mentions the 2002 CMO report, which I linked to here:
Any prior link with depression is likely to be highly complex.
Wessely knows this. He's studied it.
But it's worth remembering that this link is also found for many other disorders, including Parkinson's and MS, and it's a known risk for cardiovascular diseases.
This is one of the problems with "independent" groups.
If you genuinely have no knowledge of a particular subject area, it doesn't make you more objective, it just makes you much more susceptible to the nonsense that some high-profile charlatans can throw at you. 🙄
The (International) Cambridge Symposium on ME/CFS/PVFS (April 1990) occurred a few weeks after Melvin Ramsay died.
The proceedings from the conference were eventually published in this book, 2 years later (1992): me-pedia.org/wiki/The_Clini…x.com/RFH1955/status…
Dr Leslie Simpson (from Univ of Otago, NZ) mentioned the symposium in a letter to the JRSocMed in 1991...
His research on Nondiscocytic Erythrocytes in the Pathogenesis of ME/CFS is included in the book at chapter 65.pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12…
Ramsay and Dowsett's study was published in the Postgrad Medical Journal in 1990, but this was the last time that Dowsett managed to get any of her research published in a UK journal. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC24…
Yesterday, the @MEAssociation published this statement on its website, alleging that their trustees had been accused of illegal payments and dishonesty. meassociation.org.uk/2024/12/mea-st…
They claimed that the current 2014 version of their Articles of Association, as registered with Companies House in 2014, does not forbid payments to trustees for services provided.
They helpfully posted a link to that document.
And if you click on the link and download those "2014 Articles of Association", this is what you see at the relevant section: