1/n The largest actual threat and danger in the world today, by far, is the USA's massive and unrelenting economic-isolation wars, backed by aggressive and increasing military containments.
2/n The Empire is desperately applying massive force against all elements seeking sovereign development and free trade, at a time when USA activity is now predictably surpassed by Eurasian development.
3/n This mass economic/military USA war is more dangerous than the Cold War because:
- Eurasian (Chinese) economic challenge is real and effective, thus USA is more desperate.
- USA democracy has been shredded, and indoctrination levels are high.
4/n 1000 USA military bases abroad, naval blockade of China itself, NATO encircling Russia with missile bases, crushing isolation (and occupation) of Syria, Iran, Lebanon, Iraq, Afghanistan..., blockades of Venezuela, Cuba, all who dare, merciless occupation of Africa...
5/n Pressure of siege = attempts to survive and grow = military and gorilla actions = escalation = regional war = domino consequences = unpredictable outcomes = generations of hate between peoples and continued danger = no civil liberties, complete surveillance and control
6/n = totalitarianism everywhere
7/n Pharma, Agri-food et al., finance, ..., are all just the thugs and plantation structures of the USA Empire, allowed to exist and created by the Empire, for the Empire.
This analysis will not be in the mainstream media.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ Today, I spent most of the day being examined and cross-examined in a tribunal. My status as an expert witness was opposed. My 71-page CV was in evidence. At 3pm, the three Members (judges) of the tribunal unanimously determined that my status as an expert is established in the areas of epidemiology and toxicity and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines.
2/ A non-medical professional is being disciplined for publicly suggesting that the vaccines are dangerous and that the pandemic was organized. The professional order argues that truth and justification are not relevant and that, therefore, my testimony (as an expert recognized by the tribunal) cannot be relevant and should not be heard.
3/ Next, the tribunal will decide in the coming months, in writing, without hearing my evidence, whether or not my evidence would be relevant, and whether or not to allow my expert testimony moving forward.
After reading my chapter in the @canary_covid book, one reader concludes:
"i have come to believe that the whole idea of "pandemic" is fraudulent.... that there is absolutely no threat whatsoever to humanity or civilization from disease, never has been, never will, and moreover,
2. that god gave me an immune system which is up to any challenge nature can come up with. also, it cannot possibly be right to proactively medicate or intervene with entire healthy populations (e.g., "vaccines"), from either a spiritual or medical perspective.
3. i believe "pandemics" are just another made up boogeyman that totalitarian states have fabricated to enslave the masses in fear. i also believe that any historical reports of "pandemics" and "medical miracles of modern science" are entirely fraudulent,
BREAKING: You want proof?
Look at Figure 6A: Booster delivery vs all-cause deaths in Australia by week !
Vaccine injection fatality ratio vIFR = 0.05 % correlation-canada.org/report-probabl…
1. Pointing out that the evidence for respiratory viruses is tenuous and faulty does not prove that there was no pandemic. Rather, it shows that the hypothesis of virus has not been established as viable. You cannot prove a negative. You can only disprove by contradiction.
2. Showing that all-cause mortality does not follow the model of an infectious new viral respiratory disease does prove, by contradiction, that this model was not acting in societies on the planet, that there was no "pandemic".
3. Peaks in all-cause mortality, which are synchronous with vaccine rollouts do not prove that the injections caused the deaths. It becomes a question of the probability of the coincidence, and comparing other reasons for the coincidence.