A B2B Product Management Story: on discovering problems that customers actually care about
Very visual story thread👇🏾
Our story starts with a new product idea
PM diligently talks to customers about whether this product will solve their problems
Customers say yes!
PM reports findings to the executive team
There's excitement
Staffing obtained 🙌🏾
🎉🎊
Hardly any customer adopts it
At the next product review:
PM directs attention towards positives:
“Here’s what we’ve learnt”
Learnings usually include:
“Our MVP isn’t sufficient. We need to make it easier to implement & adopt. We need features X, Y, Z”
PM gets mandate to build said features
Adoption is still anemic😐
At next product review:
Sales & Marketing start getting implicated
PM says:
“We know from talking to customers that we have the right product. We just need to improve our Go-To-Market strategy.”
Executives & the PM are “pot-committed” at this point.
Ideas about how to better sell the product are discussed: reduce prices, cross-sell, bundle, email campaigns, re-organize the Sales team, etc.
Changes are made.
Still no growth😟
By this time, original PM has left the team
A new PM joins. Starts with a “customer listening tour” in first 90 days
Identifies some additional issues
Presents new findings & recommendations to the executive team
Gets mandate to execute on revised plan
Now what?
Go back a few tweets
Repeat the steps a couple more times
More things shipped
Still no growth
And then...
Ultimately:
Executive team decides to sunset the product
Learnings are captured and shared widely in the org
"We haven't failed, we have learnt"
Of course, Edison is quoted at some point
So, what really happened here?
Many possible reasons for this saga, but the most common ones:
(A) The product should not have been built in the first place
(B) The original product was ill-conceived & the later pivots had to inherit this original error
Let's look at (A)👇🏾
The product solved *a* problem
But not *the* problem
Often, product teams want to be in the top right quadrant
But, there's more to the puzzle
We need to understand this
And remember it
Daniel Kahneman said:
“Nothing in life is as important as you think it is, while you are thinking about it”
This is the Focusing Illusion.
The Focusing Illusion, in business:
“Nothing in business is as important as it actually is, while you are talking about it.”
When you talk to a customer about a specific problem, they will naturally “focus” on that problem, at the exclusion of other problems they (or their business overall) is facing.
With this focus comes a disproportionate emphasis on solving THAT specific problem.
A good solution here:
Customer Problems Stack Rank (CPSR)
Ask the customer to stack rank the problem vs. the other problems they are trying to solve for their business & org.
Also get the CPSR from other personas involved: VP Support, VP Mktg...
You are now closer to truth.
The lesson
Huge thanks to @shaunemiller for collaboration on this thread.
Working on B2B products at a product-focused company is fun for product people who get energized by business impact *and* want to build superb products
Executing well on an important problem is a necessary but not sufficient condition for business impact. Should also have a rigorous strategy. You don't *have* to write it down, though it often does help align the team better.
Some ppl are surprised by the exuberance with which PG’s Founder Mode blog post has been received. There are many reasons for its strong resonance.
But the main one is that it introduces a catchy term for something that many founders & leaders have seen & experienced first-hand.
Here’s my prediction: a majority of founders & leaders who said to themselves this weekend “henceforth I am going to be in Founder Mode” are likely to mess it up.
That is not bad per se. They might still end up being in a better place than if they continued with Manager Mode.
Product life in midsized & large companies starts making a lot more sense when you understand that a large % of middle & upper management thinks their main job is to (i) try & decipher what the CEO wants done (ii) align their org with it (iii) propose a plan that the CEO approves
This is instead of *often* telling the CEO what actually needs to be done, in a way that is grounded in (a) deep insight into customers & market (b) creative product & GTM solutions
Many in middle & upper management will of course blame incentives set by the company for this.
And they are not wrong. But it is worth evaluating how much of one’s career (and life) one wants to spend in aligning perfectly with incentives set by another party.
Everything we create, everything we do, it all starts with our thinking
Clear thinking drastically improves odds of success in all departments of career & life
While clear thinking is quite rare, it can be developed with practice
Advanced principles for clear thinking:
(1/12)
1) Essence first. Not story. Not analogy
Most people get seduced by great analogies & exciting stories.
Clear thinkers don’t *form* their thinking via analogies. They identify the essence of the issue, in their specific context. Then, they use analogies as one of their inputs.
2) WAYRTTD
“What Are You _Really_ Trying To Do” is a simple but powerful tool to make you pause & identify your real goal
Most people move too quickly to How & When to do a given task. But the task isn’t the goal
Clear thinkers have built a habit of asking themselves WAYRTTD.
Apple Pie Position:
A statement that instantly elevates the person who is saying it and is simultaneously hard for anyone else to push back on, and so everyone avoids the personal risk and just nods “yes”, even though its actual value in this specific situation might be… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Okay, so now that you understand Apple Pie, here’s your crash course on dealing with Apple Pie:
1) The greatest thing about Apple Pie Positions is that you now have a name to assign to a complex behavior (and it is a cute name, which helps a lot). Once you share this idea with… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
One other important thing:
Note that Apple Pie Positions are, by definition, specific to the context. This means that the same sentence can be either the right thing to focus on, or it can be an Apple Pie Position. The way you determine which is which is through good judgment.