Why do we fall prey of illusions such as the one below?
The answer lies in how our brain is wired
(thread, 1/N)
2/ Let's look at a fragment of the previous image.
It looks coherent and could plausibly exist.
3/ Also the other two fragments, when examined one by one, look plausible.
4/ The thing is, our brain does not examine the image as a whole (even though we have the impression it does so).
If it did, it would notice the logical impossibility.
5/ Instead, our brain considers the image as a patchwork.
Coherence is evaluated at this level, one piece of the patchwork at a time. If each looks coherent, our brain will *intuitively* think that the image is okay.
Hence the illusion.
6/ Of course, we have powerful analytical capabilities. If we focus, we can examine the image as a whole and notice the logical incoherences.
Analytically, it seems wrong.
Intuitively, it seems right.
Hence the awkward feeling from the illusion.
7/ Our brain does not evaluate large pieces of information as a whole. At least intuitively, it breaks them down in pieces and evaluates each separately, leading to some of the quirks in our functioning.
I call this the Distributed Brain Framework.
8/ It's an important topic, for it explain why we sometimes decide something but do something else. Or why we hallucinate. Or why we confabulate explanations for our behavior.
However, it's too complex to explain in a Twitter thread, so I decided to organize a free talk about it
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I recently got a small grant (courtesy of Kanro, Vitalik Buterin's foundation) to produce some educational materials regarding the pandemic response.
These 10 one-pagers are the first batch of educational materials.
Any feedback?
1/10
Some more background about the one-pagers. They are meant for people who are already onboard with the need to properly react to an eventual future pandemic but don't have the vocabulary or examples to explain to others what they can do and why.
2/10
A simple model to understand indoor infection risk
Nothing about graduation rates (literacy rates, yes).
Instead:
– Knowing what matters for society to work well
– Being able to find a value-adding role in society
– Having learned that personal improvement is achievable
Things such as:
– What brings prosperity?
– What did countries that were wealthy and democratic do (or didn't do) that caused them to become poor or totalitarian
Seems banal, but…
2/6
…we only discuss how good it's to be prosperous or democratic without discussing how to get there or how not to fall back to the default state (poverty / absence of rights)
3/6
A problem of many organizations is that they are aware of the needs of employees (impact, recognition, growth, fair salary, etc) but fulfill them as they would with a checklist: let's do this superficially, checked, done.
Some examples (& solutions) ↓
1/8
Example #1: recognition.
Many companies and managers know that employees want recognition.
But they fulfill this need in a very superficial way. With a small internal award, a certificate, etc. Top red flag: it's HR-driven and/or feels cringe.
2/8
The alternative:
– make it personal: it should come from the boss or the boss' boss.
– make it congruent: a moment of recognition followed by a year of no recognition feels (and likely is) fake.
3/8
Whenever we desire an outcome but not the actions that would make us achieve it, we end up with inaction, busywork, shortcuts, excuses, and, ultimately, frustration.
(a thread of highlights from the first chapter of my book "The Control Heuristic")
1/14
You probably do not have a decision-making problem, but an action-taking one
2/14
Decision-making is not the same as action-taking.
The cortex is mostly responsible for taking decisions, and the ~basal ganglia determines whether we act on our decisions.