Time seems to be appropriate to do a thread on Blasphemy laws so let's start with the Calcutta Quran petition as it is the most famous example of the laws being used by Hindus even though there are other cases also .
Sujato Bhadra vs. State of West Bengal from 2005 and S Veerabadran Chettiar vs EV Ramaswami Naicker and Ors from 1958 are among the others .
Relevant Sections include Section 95 which allows governments to search and forfeit anything which is liable to hurt sentiments of the people .
Section 96 which allows for government actions taken under Section 95 to be questioned in Court .
Section 295 ( The most infamous of them all)
Section 153 A
Chandmal Chopra, Hamangshu Kumar Chakraborthy Sital Singh filed a petition at the Calcutta High Court praying for a Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution on March 29, 1985, directing the State of West Bengal to declare each copy of the Quran, as forfeited
They contented that by refusing to make the declaration as sought by them In a letter dt. 16th March, 1985 addressed to the Secretary, Department of Home, The Government of West Bengal
had failed to discharge its statutory duty laid down in Section 95 of the Cr. P. C., 1973.
In support of their petition , portions of various parts of Koran included in surahs and ayats therein were quoted by them
The judgment was delivered by Justice Bimal Chandra Basak of the Calcutta High Court on 17 May 1985. He dismissed the petition .
He held that portions of the Koran had been quoted by the petitioners out of context and the same did not reflect any malicious or deliberate intention of outraging the religious feelings of non-muslims. he noted that there were various interpretations of the different verses
The full judgment can be read here
Not long after the Calcutta Quran Petition
the Hindu Raksha Dal In 1986 published a poster
titled ‘Why riots take place in the country?’ citing 24 ayāts, which figure in the petition as well,
The poster was in Hindi that reproduced the ayāts verbatim from an authentic edition of the Qur’ān, which provided the Arabic text along with its translation in Hindi and English,
The poster stated that these verses “command the believers (Musalmans) to fight against followers of other faiths,” and that “so long as these ayāts are not removed [from the Qur’ān], riots in the country cannot be prevented.”
The case against them also under the same sections was dismissed by the Metropolitan Magistrate of Delhi, Z S Lohat stating
Plz unroll @threadreaderapp

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Harbard Cow

Harbard Cow Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CodeNameProteus

6 Apr
Today we will have a thread on the Periyar ganesh Idol breaking case
On May 27, 1953, EV Ramaswami Naicker smashed an idol of Lord Ganesha in public at the Town Hall maidan in Tiruchirappalli .
he had made a speech announcing his intention to do this before breaking the idol.
Veerabadran Chettiar, filed a case against Naicker under two laws.
Section 295: Section 295-A: ImageImage
Read 13 tweets
5 Apr
Today we will have a thread on the Sujato Bhadra case
The Sujato Bhadra vs State Of West Bengal was related to the ban on Taslima Nasreen's novel
Dwikhandita which was was the third volume of
Amar Meyebela written by the author;
The book was first banned in Bangladesh and then it was banned in WestBengal in 2003
by the Left Front Government fearing that book could incite communal discord .
The Courts lifted the Ban in 2005 via the judgement mentioned above .
Read 8 tweets
2 Apr
Today's thread is about the Collegium system .
India’s Constitution originally stipulated that the judges of the Supreme Court and high courts would be appointed by the President based on a process of “consultation” with senior judges.
In the 1970s, there was a perception that the independence of the judiciary was under threat.
As a result the present collegium system emerged based on three key rulings.
Read 13 tweets
1 Apr
Today we will read a short thread on Article 14 which is concerned with the Right to Equality and is one of the fundamental rights included in Part III of the Indian constitution .
This is article 14 .
Equality before Law states that in a country all should be treated equally and the state should not discriminate against any religion ,race ,caste or sex .
Read 9 tweets
29 Mar
Today we will have a thread on the 24th Amendment which gave the Parliament power to amend all parts of the Constitution including Part III relating to fundamental rights .
The Bill sought to amend article 368 as article 368 provides for amendment of the Constitution as well as procedure therefore.
The Bill also sought to amend article 13 of the Constitution to make it inapplicable to any amendment of the Constitution under article 368.
Read 41 tweets
27 Mar
Thanks to @Biorahul and @LogicalHindu_ I am writing this thread from the book Memories of a Lacerated Heart (1971): A War Memoir (From East Pakistan to Bangladesh) . This book gives us an insight into the mind of Pakistani army officer who witnessed the events of 1971 firsthand
"We had some shovels in our jeep and with passion and vigor I began attacking the idols with the Subaydar Sahib. As we were breaking the idols I felt deeply satisfied"
"I was experiencing a spiritual calmness simply by demolishing the gods of those people who were the real instigators of the current situation in my country"
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!