Esha K. Profile picture
6 Apr, 11 tweets, 6 min read
White ML's have such a hard time coping with MMT because it means having to come to grips with the fact that the white working-class benefits both imperialism and war.

Instead, they make up any excuse for that not to be true, including sounding like a sovereign citizen.
Anyways, Rosa Luxemburg in the accumulation of capital does a weird handwaving to promote the useful "settler" in the wilderness of the "new world" myth with a bit of handwaving.

She clearly speaks about British-Argentine relations and we know who did the work (not Brits).
See her handwaiving. The yellow is 100% correct.

But the purple is her "assumption" and then based on the purple, is the green conclusion.
Now,this explains the meltdown and the inability to be coherent.
See how long they were melting down!
These two spurious insults really got me going
And the moral of this story is that if they are racist towards you, they are covering up an even more racist belief such as "British labor built the railroads in India"

And all because they can't handle the idea that they "benefit" from imperialism.
In addition to reading Rosa Luxemburg, also read her critiques too!

This may help clear up the confusion.
And for those who accuse me of bad faith,I started in chapter 3, but I got all these red flag detectors go off and that's when I looked up Pannekoek. I took his critique and then identified the part most applicable.
Here is the federal reserve chair (man in charge of creating money) explaining how money is created.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Esha K.

Esha K. Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @eshaLegal

7 Apr
Let's just try creating a twitter thread. The only thing I ask is to only use this thread for this topic.

Karl Marx defines commodity.
(I think this is the best way to fix misunderstandings in good faith)
@SovietNecromanc @ProletariatRis1 Image
Basically, a commodity has both a use value and an exchange value.

As of now, Marx intends to only describe the following relationship
C ----> U & E

But, not
U & E ----> C.

Do you two agree? (like) ImageImageImage
This is how I visualize the next paragraph. Image
Read 4 tweets
7 Apr
What imperialism? Please do tell.

Here are the big 4 colonizers. ImageImageImageImage
Honorable mentions. ImageImageImageImage
So before asking dumb questions, ask yourself are there any communist governments doing imperialism (answer no).
Read 4 tweets
7 Apr
I usually read some moderately right-wing, financial journal for my news. Western propaganda itself tells you a lot if you know how to read.

The problem here is that you don't seem to understand imperialism.
But people like @anarchopac are in another world.

Because they believe that all states are inherently evil, they are willing to uncritically accept any nonsense against those states.

It's like they can't understand lesser evil and colonialism.
India is a bourgeois, capitalist state. Yet, our lives are 10000 times better without the British.

Even with a parliamentary bourgeois Democracy, not having people loot your resources, automatically improves things with all things being equal.
historicly.substack.com/p/the-ghosts-o…
Read 4 tweets
7 Apr
It is fixed in time!

------- commodity------- exchanged to money--------exchanged to commodity----- but each moment in time, it is one thing.

the definition of money is oppositional to commodity!

Commodities can be used as money. IE.. commodities take the form of money.
But, it is neither here nor there. Ultimately, Marx's C---M----C theory is to explain this... via a "network node" Image
Also... stop yourself before you get an instinct to troll me... just realize that there is a small chance I maybe right and go read it yourself slowly and carefully. Image
Read 10 tweets
6 Apr
That's a hilarious way to frame "wanting to win in swing districts"

1. We all know the @dccc selectively decides what is a swing district and what is "too far gone"
2. This is always based on their fealty to corporate interest.

Pretending it is neutral is dishonest at best. Image
Anyone who has read @ryangrim book "we've got people" should understand how arbitrary the selection of "swing districts" is: Image
They outright sabotaged Laura Moser.

theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Read 4 tweets
6 Apr
Historically speaking, whenever there is a viable third party, the democrats and republicans collude to make it illegal.

The system is flawed to make sure the will of the people is never realized.

[see thread for examples].
In 1912, Eugene Debs won millions of votes *from prison*

WW1 happened,sedition laws happened and socialist party was purged
After ww2, the communist party was very popular for the very obvious reasons:

So, they banned the communist party from running in elections.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!