Wobble Profile picture
6 Apr, 7 tweets, 2 min read
One of the best investing talks I've seen in a while: math genius and former managing director of Renaissance @financequant talking about analyzing 180 years of drawdowns in financial markets. h/t @PeterLBrandt

Favorite points & personal takeaways below

1⃣ Investors in financial markets are in a state of draw down (below high watermark) ~80% of the time, and are in a state of severe drawdown (20%+ below high watermark) almost half the time. This is true even for wildly successful, consistently uptrending investments like S&P500
As Dr. Frey notes, this is a significant stressor for investors: you must prepare to be in a perpetual "state of regret." I also think it's a helpful reminder that you shouldn't get attached to high watermarks or think you're doing something wrong just because (well) below yours.
2⃣ Drawdown characteristics are consistent across time and markets. Interestingly, there is no noticeable difference in the characteristics of drawdowns between different time periods or markets, despite changes in the markets like the advent of central banks and HFT.
This suggests that the history of drawdowns is an expression of human nature & not peculiar to markets or market structures. I think a corollary of this is that it's unwise to assume that some structural change in markets (fed policy, WSB, etc) will change drawdown nature going⏩
3⃣Dr. Frey shares that the Great Depression was not an outlier drawdown, and that would be the case even if he removed it from his observations. Drawdowns like the Great Depression may be rare and happen only once every 1-2 lifetimes, but as Dr. Frey commented, if he hears
someone remark again that we'll never have another Great-Depression-level drawdown, he'll have to shoot them. Just reinforces my takeaway from point (2), and a reminder to heed history and stay vigilant.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Wobble

Wobble Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @wob_ble

5 Mar
With everyone contemplating risk right now, I thought I’d share a risk management point from Aaron Brown, risk management authority and former risk manager of AQR (a quant firm with 200B AUM), that I find helpful for cutting through a lot of noise: while there are infinitely many
risks out there (interest rate changes, economic reports, political turmoil, warfare, etc.), there is a finite number of impacts those risks can have on your portfolio. Namely, they can cause the prices of your securities to go down a little or a lot, and slowly or quickly.
Thinking through those possible outcomes and how prepared you are for each of them can go a long way in tightening up your risk management IMO. For example, what if the market drops 1% a day for the next 30 days? Would you buy the dip too soon and be unprepared to emotionally
Read 6 tweets
1 Feb
For long positions, I think we're in a golden era for deep ITM LEAP calls. Some advantages:

1. Leaps are interest-rate sensitive. For calls, lower interest rate = cheaper, higher interest rate = more expensive. Going long LEAPs is a way to help hedge against risk of ⬆️rates at
these bottom levels, and there's (presumably) little risk of rates going lower.

2. LEAPs have relatively high vegas, meaning that they benefit from increases in implied volatility. There is reason to believe markets will be increasingly volatile going forward. LEAPs are a way
to get long volatility exposure. It even helps on downward shocks: when a vol event occurs that shocks to the downside, the increase in volatility will offset some (sometimes all) of the loss in the underlying. This is especially true since the less ITM that the option is, the
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!