From everything I've read, I truly believe that #covidisairborne, #safeschools and #vocs are all indelibly linked. I'm still putting the pieces all together, but maybe you can help. A LONG thread, please bear with me.
#bcpoli #bced 🧵
Let's get this out of the way: any debate of whether C-19 is airborne is stupid, because it has all the properties of an airborne pathogen. It rides on infectious airborne particles.

This article is old & dated now, but easily understood:…
Here's a great illustration of how airborne spread of C-19 happens, and how both close exposure and duration of exposure combined with ventilation matter.…
So, we all know "R0", but you need to understand COVID's "k" number - its dispersion. Essentially, most (69%) people don't transmit COVID forward at all, but of those that do, some *REALLY* spread it. Especially when conditions are favourable.…
A big component of C-19's dispersion is that wild type (this is foreshadowing) is actually not that infectious. The spike protein repels human cell receptors. It evolved to be able to infect humans, but not well.

You have to receive a significant viral load to get sick
That significant viral load could be from short-term close contact, or prolonged exposure to a contaminated airspace. Or if you're really unlucky, surface-hand-mouth/nose contamination - theoretically (& actually unproven!)

Early on "experts" said we "don't produce aerosols." This is false. Most don't produce many, while some produce a LOT. 3 orders of magnitude difference!!! (Some produce 1000x more than others). Age, weight, and COVID infection are factors

Particularly, younger, lighter humans produce far fewer aerosols, especially if not singing/shouting, although again there's variance. This is a legitimate physiologically advantage for *most* children, especially when clustered together indoors.…
So with all this above, we start to understand why COVID acts as it does: clusters of infections; indoor is dangerous, outdoors is safer until busy / high positivity rates; why so many places can't trace ~25-30% of infections' sources; why some think schools are safe.
It also explains why VCH found only 10% of school cases transmitted forward (warning: severe data collection bias due to no asymptomatic testing). However, those 10% of transmitters *could* be responsible for 20%, 40%, or more of the school exposures…
It also explains why in some places, schools have actually been made safe - by focusing on everyone wearing masks, having great ventilation, and upgrading filtration: (image from @smjevnikar). 80% of schools required masks outdoors!…
With sufficient safety protocols combined with kids' physiological advantages and C-19's fairly poor infectiousness, viral exposure can be reduced & schools *can* be pretty safe.

But many places delude themselves into thinking they've done so, by not testing asymptomatics.
There are tons of high quality Wave 2 studies now, showing that we're missing lots of child cases due to test protocols, schools are amplifying cases in the community, living with children increases risk considerably, etc. E.g. here's one (of many!):

So - remember I foreshadowed that *wild type* C-19 isn't very good at infecting humans? VoCs change this. E.g. B.1.1.7 and P.1 both have far greater ability to infect cells. This means less viral exposure is required to get sick, and it spreads faster inside our bodies.
Schools had struck a point of balance, where transmissions were low enough that, combined with community interventions, cases didn't explode overall. But VoCs change all this.…
What we were seeing was that having a child infected with original C-19 in a classroom with decent ventilation and most wearing masks usually resulted in 0 or 1 or 2 others getting infected. Most often, 0.

But VoCs make us sicker faster, and require lower viral load to infect
With wild type, if we had adults crammed into buildings the way our schoolchildren are, there'd be crazy superspreader events. With VoCs, the advantage of child physiology is erased. Children catch & spread like adults used to. And take it home to parents who spread it even more
VoCs *can* be controlled. E.g. UK, Ireland, South Africa, to an extent Denmark - all have managed to control VoCs. But you know what they didn't do? Keep kids in schools.

NO region has controlled VoCs with schools open. NONE.
I used to be a huge proponent of keeping schools open safely. That is no longer possible - or rather, we have no examples of anywhere that's proved it's possible. This is a HUGE RED FLAG. This is not an experiment I want to conduct on BC's children, families, citizens.
So what do we need to do?
1) CRUCIAL! Schools go online except essential / safety students
2) Provincial lockdown, including restrictions on travel
3) Transparent data reporting and honesty from @bcndp
4) Proactive vaccination of high-risk, high-transmission areas

When? NOW.
Oh, and go for #zerocovid. With vaccines, yes, but not only via vaccines. It seems weird to say, but we should be avoiding avoidable deaths.
BTW - I didn't cover Long Covid at all, above. Covid can cause all sorts of chronic problems, including potentially-permanent organ damage. For many, surviving COVID isn't like surviving the flu.

Death isn't the only tragic outcome of COVID

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Rob DuMont

Rob DuMont Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @rdumont99

4 Apr
Here's something I don't get. @bcndp call an early election in the midst of the pandemic, achieve a mandate and a majority. Why not use that to safeguard health and pursue an elimination strategy? Politically, it made the most sense. 1/
We already knew it was better for the economy AND for health, but was a short-term, difficult process. But they would've had 4 years to live it down. At worst there'd be limited economic damage and a few noisy covidiot protests. But polls showed support for stricter measures. 2/
Economic woes are short term and only play into elections while in progress; people have short memories for economic pain after it's over.

But you know what people remember? Death and disease. 3/
Read 5 tweets
26 Mar
Watching the BC COVID-19 Update for Mar 25, 2021. Noticing a few head-scratching things worth mentioning, so let's do a thread, shall we? Let's dive in! (youtube links will take you directly to that part of the video)

Oh, and a warning - this is a critique thread! There were lots of things I found positive, especially around early vaccine success, but that's not the purpose here.

If you don't want criticisms of BC's response or DBH's decision-making, please save yourself the pain ;)
1) Re variant screening, "there's a day or so delay, which is why we report it a bit separately." This is misleading.

Screening takes a day. Reporting takes 9+. The data reported Mar 23 ~matches totals from the wk ending Mar 13. It's not a "day or so".

Read 19 tweets
25 Mar
People keep saying, "oh, be nice to Bonnie Henry, stop saying she doesn't know science" blah blah blah.

Exhibit A:…

My chart below didn't factor in P1, which I've heard a rumour has escaped, nor extra indoor religious gatherings for said P.1 to spread.
I'm trying to somehow come up with a way to see this as anything other than INSANE, and every path my brain takes just comes back to: "no, this is truly batshit"

Maybe if we deployed the 2M rapid tests gathering warehouse dust, but DBH for some reason thinks those don't work.
It's also amazingly coincidental that allowing outdoor gatherings started with Spring Break, and this is timed right with end of Spring Break.

It'll be really hard to tell if B.1.1.7 is spreading more easily in schools like it has anywhere that's bothered to test for it
Read 5 tweets
24 Mar
So uhh.... is this too alarmist?

#bcpoli #canpoli
BTW, I want to add - BC's data is a MESS. You all knew that already, but did you know every week they under-report new cases by ~10%?

You can see my "Actual Cases?" column is actually pretty close to their Week 5 and Week 9 numbers here.
From the screenshot above: "As data become more complete"

Let me translate: "We do these weekly Sit Reports for a time period ending 10 days ago, but we still don't have all the test data tabulated for that week, or even the week before that!"
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!