My opinion on IQ, start ups, creativity and conscientiousness;
High IQ basically means you’re creative.

You’re able to provide elaborate solutions to changing complex problems;
Creativity is measured by,

the amount of useful ideas generated by thinking over one idea.

And how improbable those ideas are compared to what others come up with.

AND how implementable

AND useful the idea is.

You can quantify creativity using a plot graph.
If you think of one idea and it coactivates other ideas, that’s a measure of your fluency in creativity.
If your co activated ideas are useful and unlikely for others to come up, that’s a measure of originality in your creativity.
“Can you be successful in your start up if you’re low in creativity (avg IQ)”

Yes and no.

A Startup = creativity + elements of conscientiousness.
Some of the elements of conscientiousness is procedural;

ie; you have to be orderly, resilient, persistent, organised.

Comparing it to chess; it’s like learning the opening lines 30 moves into the game via memory.
Those with average IQ can easily learn the “opening lines” of a start up;

- The core revenue generating service
- Market demographic
- Marketing
- Budgeting
- etc etc etc

These are procedures and can be outsourced to experts.
The challenge for avg IQ is that their “idea” will encounter infinite problems.

Compare this to chess;

Your opponent (problems) will set you up for defeat in infinite ways.

Your job is to solve these complex problems by strategising, fantasising, predicting, envisioning.
It’s possible for an avg IQ to solve problems if they are CONSTANTLY exposed to a narrow field in a start up.

But that does not guarantee the ability to solve outside that domain.

i.e; practising the sicilian defence will not make you an expert in kings indian defence.
Whereas for a high IQ individual,

they are able to see overlap, patterns and associations between problems across multiple domains,

multiplying their capacity to solve these problems.
If a start up is successful in its first year, it will probably fail in its second year.

If it’s successful in its second year, it will likely fail in 5 years.

The odds will always favour failure.

Because the complexity of problems outpaces the human capacity to solve them.
If you’re avg IQ, you need to capitalise on the “opening lines” of your startup if you want to increase your chances of success.

Then you should probably work with high IQ people to help solve complex problems (and protect yourself with intellectual property rights).

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with UnmodernM

UnmodernM Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @UnmodernM

5 Apr
In this day and age,

if you’re a poor performing employee,

your probability of getting fired entirely rests upon how risk tolerant your employer is.

Doesn’t matter how you appear to everyone else.

It all comes down to your employer and their experience with unfair dismissal.
The system strongly supports employees, even the incompetent ones.

We used to be able to fire incompetent employees merely on the basis of poor performance.

This is no longer the case.

Employees can now easily launch a case of unfair dismissal and discrimination.
There are bosses that are risk averse who rather waste the cost of wages on an incompetent employee,

rather than face their chances of winning a case of unfair dismissal/discrimination.
Read 9 tweets
3 Apr
Disagreeableness is the most attractive trait for men.

Disagreeableness as a term at face value makes little sense with regards to attractiveness.

But applying context to what you’re saying “no” to immediately makes you stand out.
No to availability.

You shouldn’t be available at the request of anyone.

You should be unavailable, because you’re busy pursuing something of great importance and meaning to you.

And everyone else should suffer in comparison.
Read 10 tweets
3 Apr
There’s a difference between a job and a career.

Most people have jobs they hate.

Very few engage in a career.

The former are wage slaves.

The latter are not.

A job has no responsibility outside its job description;

you turn up, do your hours and go home.

A career is a high accountability position where you are responsible for the operations of a business.

Everyone can do the former.

Not everyone can do the latter.
A job usually requires no credentials and provides ceiling opportunity for progression/ascension.

A career usually requires credentials and has no ceiling for opportunity for progression.

i.e; you can reach shareholder position.
Read 11 tweets
31 Mar
Working in corporate for 10 years, literally growing up around directors and executives,

I’ve been fortunate enough to know what you have to do, to be taken seriously;

Here’s what “we” think.

Take note, or don’t;

If you waste time, you’re like cancer.

We will avoid you like the plague.

Because our first instinct is that you will waste our time, once you’ve wasted yours.
Take your life seriously.

Otherwise we will never take you seriously.
Read 18 tweets
30 Mar
Common question I get in DMs,

"Advice for a guy dating older women".

My Advice;

Stop dating older women. You have at least 4 factors that go entirely against you when you date older women;

Whether you like it or not, women older than you will have more experience in life than you will.

It's extremely hard to amass valuable experience in a short period of time at a depth that makes someone who's lived more than you,

look relatively inexperienced.

If you're behind in experience, you will probably lack dominance. Especially if she's well positioned in life, which usually comes with age (earns good income, high responsibility etc).

A well established life comes with age and hard work.

You'll be behind in this.
Read 10 tweets
24 Mar

Men who begin to abuse steroids become more right leaning in their political ideologies but also become more stupid.

High levels of testosterone makes an individual more competitive, adaptive to harsher conditions but also reduces their risk assessment.
Young men with low test are more likely to be left leaning and risk averse.

Men who abuse steroids are unlikely to accurately assess risk and therefore become intellectually handicapped.

Note; Abusing test =/= Using test.
Optimal use of steroids, achieving upper normal range according to age appears to "modify" men into the best version of themselves.

The issue is that most don't stop at the healthy range.

This is largely due to the aesthetic image achieved by abusing steroids.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!