Beautyon Profile picture
7 Apr, 15 tweets, 4 min read
The CCI is the DCG 2.0. it's a regrouped, re-branded anti-Bitcoin association from the 2017 Block Size War, with the same bad characters and actors trying to co-opt Bitcoin by virtue of their wealth. If Bitcoin succeeds, they will and must fail again. medium.com/@beautyon_/the…
It is clear that the bad actors have learned nothing over the last 4 years. What they're going to do this time is fork Bitcoin to prevent the coming improvements to it and kill the adoption of Lightning which will change everything. This is why they're not building on LND.
Coinbase and the other bad actors use ordinary database operations to move balances between users, leaving onchain for large consolidation. They use databases to replace onchain sends between users. In a CCI Blockchain Consortium, they could all use one database, and not LND.
To stop LND, they need to change “bitcoind”, the server and standard the network runs on. They believe they have enough users to fork Bitcoin into a new network that can absorb everyone, stop privacy improvements from being introduced and kill Elizabeth Stark's Lightning Network.
They also believe that the State can ban bitcoin 1.0, leaving them in full control of the protocol and all future development. The first thing they will do is increase the block size. This will do several things. It will make sending Bitcoin onchain cheap, killing Lightning...
...and it will prevent all small companies and players from running a full node without permission, strangling new competition at birth, and protecting CCI member's market dominance and positions of absolute power.
They will also cripple their version of Bitcoin so that it cannot be private, unlike Bitcoin Core (the real Bitcoin) which has privacy features coming that are also space saving, making it totally opaque and more powerful. The CCI must act now to kill Lightning and stop Bitcoin.
If I'm right, you will see CCI calling for:
1 Formal “democratic” community control of the protocol
2 An increase in the Block Size
3 Formal “Blockchain Industry Standards”
4 Membership of companies “in the space”
5 Overt rejection of privacy enhancements
6 100% Wallet compliance
These companies will claim they are for innovation, “Its in the name!” If that were true, they would all be adopting Lightning, and SegWit, which Blockchain.info has not even bothered to implement. The best they can hope to achieve is an American Gulag Altcoin, or “FAIL”
The world is a big place. Most people on earth can't qualify for a Coinbase account or an account at Jack's or any CCI member company. They don't care, and I'll leave it to you to name the sentiment behind their disregard for the vast majority of humanity. Bitcoin must win this.
Real Bitcoiners knew that attacks like this were coming. They've been planning for them, and have the means to defeat them. If they fail then Bitcoin wasn't good enough from the beginning. Now you'll see who is a real Bitcoiner, and who isn't, and you'll regret boosting traitors.
You know who the usual suspects are, and you'll know the feely de-cloaked traitors instantly. This is a binary issue. It is black and white. It is not nuanced, or a matter of perspective. You're either for Bitcoin or you're against it. It's as simple as that.
Watch the speech police, liars, and gallery of rogues dust off their 2017 playbooks to try and argue for the death of Bitcoin. If you're intelligent, or remember their names you'll be able to refute them easily. The next great test of Bitcoin has begun.
The first tweet in this thread is being blocked by Twitter. They don't want you to read it, because it tells the truth about the CCI, who is behind it, the history of the Block Size war, and why you should oppose top down control of Bitcoin. PLAIN FACT. threadreaderapp.com/thread/1379710…
It's up to you to spread this thread and the inevitable other threads and posts on this subject from others that will be similarly blocked far and wide, so people are not gulled into thinking Bitcoin needs to change at the behest of millionaires, or that it needs "Governance".

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Beautyon

Beautyon Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Beautyon_

6 Apr
No government will ever be able to challenge Bitcoin. They're so addicted to power, it is literally impossible for them to let go of it and allow the economy to run under Natural Law. China's government will never defeat Bitcoin, and will suffer an ignominious humiliation.
Always remember; the Chinese people are not the same entity as the Chinese government. Chinese software developers and engineers are brilliant at Bitcoin, and the only thing stopping them from total global domination is the Chinese government. That's a fact.
The Chinese government, in a properly functioning world would be a guide to all western governments of what not to do; they would at every turn, take the opposite route. China bans Bitcoin? Make it legal. China has Social Credit Score? Make it illegal. That way, the west wins.
Read 6 tweets
6 Apr
Stallman should stay or go?
"These sorts of beliefs have no place in the free software, digital rights, and tech communities." This is totalitarianism. If you don't look like, think like, and act like us, you are to be removed and destroyed. That's exactly what the racists did to blacks. Sorry, NO $SALE.
"We cannot continue to let one person ruin the meaning of our work. " The only meaning software has is the result of execution. It has no other meaning. Anyone can use it, no matter what they believe or think. That is what freedom is.
Read 9 tweets
6 Apr
This is amazingly stupid, and shows how economic illiteracy is widespread amongst software developers. The "Many Monies" theory (Brave's BAT and now MOB) is nonsense, and with Lightning, there is no excuse for multicoinism. Telegram is also guilty of this. signal.org/blog/help-us-t…
Facebook made the same mistake with its worthless LIBRA project, bungling the market opportunity Messenger and Whatsapp present. There is no instant messenger on a global scale that is thinking correctly. Signal's misstep is more perplexing, since they're ethics/privacy focussed.
I've posted several threads on this subject from as early as 2014, about LIBRA, ZCoin, WhatsApp and Twitter adopting Bitcoin. Here is one:
Read 4 tweets
6 Apr
No one who has a passport and the right to live in another country will put up with this. Many States in the USA are abandoning the CORONA mass hysteria. Britain will become a "Plague Nation" that everyone either avoids or wants to escape. Pitiful and Pathetic...and Pints!
And bear in mind also; now that everyone understands that it is possible to do all your work from home, no one will chose to move to Plague Nation Britain when they can either move HQ to Florida, Sweden or any other place that isn't run by madmen. Or use distributed teams.
All the stupid and worthless dreams of "Silicon Glen" and "Silicon Roundabout" are now dashed against the rocks of CORONA HYSTERIA, and the idiotic British government has brought it all upon its own head. Had they taken the route of Sweden , none of this would be happening. SAD!
Read 9 tweets
5 Apr
Larping Dingbats will never change the world, by definition. They will always be sideliners, destroying people's time with worthless chatter that is never turned into software. Unlike philosophers who educate you about how things really are LD idiots Virtue Signal. GARBAGE.
You can spot Privacy LARP by whether or not they promote businesses and services that are private by default. If they don't do this, they're Playing at Bitcoin and not actually interested in protecting anyone. All they want is to be SEEN as cutting edge.
Whatever the latest inaccessible software tool is, they want to be seen to be using it, and the more complicated, hard to use, obscure and far from production, the better for them That's the way they maintain their worthless positions as cognoscenti.
Read 5 tweets
5 Apr
The Lightning Network looks very much like other global infrastructure, because that's what it is; a global payment infrastructure built on the bedrock of Bitcoin. Image
This is a diagram of Undersea Internet Cables, providing network access to every continent. Image
World Sugar Trade. Image
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!